participating study centers with suspected COVID-19 within 7 days of symptom onset. Each Subject was
provided a BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test. Under the observation and coaching of a clinical
site sta member trained as a proctor, the Subject self-collected one (1) nasal swab and performed the
BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test. Test results were interpreted and recorded by the Subject or
other home user and independently by the proctor. Parents of pediatric Subjects under the age of 14 or
Legally Authorized Representatives of adult Subjects unable to perform self-collection collected one (1)
nasal swab from the Subject, performed the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test, then interpreted
and recorded the result for the patient.
An FDA Emergency Use Authorized real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) assay for the
detection of SARS-CoV-2 was utilized as the comparator method for this study.
The performance of BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test was established with 53 nasal swabs
collected from individual symptomatic patients (within 7 days of onset) who were suspected of COVID-19.
BinaxNOW
™
COVID-19 Antigen Self Test Performance within 7 days of symptom onset against the
Comparator Method
BinaxNOW
™
COVID-19 Ag 2 Card
Home Test
Comparator Method
Positive Negative Total
Positive 22 0 22
Negative 2 28 30
Total 24 28 52*
Positive Agreement: 22/24 91.7% (95% CI: 73.0% - 98.9%)
Negative Agreement: 28/28 100.0% (95% CI: 87.7% - 100.0%)
*1 sample generated an invalid BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag 2 Card result (0.1% invalid rate)
The performance of this test has not yet been clinically validated for use in patients without signs and
symptoms of respiratory infection or for serial screening applications, and performance may dier in these
populations.
Performance of BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test, with the test performed and results
interpreted by the home user is similar to performance obtained by test operators with no laboratory
experience. Due to the relatively small sample size for the home use clinical study, at the time of the
interim analysis, the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test positive agreement established in this
ongoing clinical study is estimated to be between 73.0% and 98.9% as reflected in the 95% Confidence
Interval. This is consistent with the performance established in a separate multi-site study in the US,
where the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card test was performed and results interpreted by test operators
with no laboratory experience. In that study, BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card test positive agreement
was 84.6% (95% CI: 76.8% - 90.6%), refer below:
The performance of BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card was established with 460 nasal swabs collected
from individual symptomatic patients (within 7 days of onset) who were suspected of COVID-19.
BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card Performance within 7 days of symptom onset against the Comparator
Method
BinaxNOW COVID-19 AgCard
Comparator Method
Positive Negative Total
Positive 99 5 104
Negative 18 338 356
Total 117 343 460
Positive Agreement: 99/117 84.6% (95% CI: 76.8% - 90.6%)
Negative Agreement: 338/343 98.5% (95% CI: 96.6% - 99.5%)
Patient demographics, time elapsed since onset of symptoms for all patients enrolled in the above study,
are presented in the table below. Positive results broken down by days since symptom onset:
Days Since
Symptom
Onset
Cumulative RT-
PCR Positive
(+)
Cumulative
BinaxNOW
COVID-19
Antigen Self Test
Positive (+)
PPA
95 % Confidence
Interval
1 12 10 83.3% 51.6% 97.9%
2 34 28 82.4% 65.5% 93.2%
3 50 41 82.0% 68.6% 91.4%
4 63 50 79.4% 67.3% 88.5%
5 78 63 80.8% 70.3% 88.8%
6 90 75 83.3% 74.0% 90.4%
7 117 99 84.6% 76.8% 90.6%
8 to 10 144 118 81.9% 74.7% 87.9%
11 to 14 161 126 78.3% 71.1% 84.4%
All specimens 167 129 77.2% 70.1% 83.4%
A cohort of patients who presented with symptom onset greater than seven days were enrolled in the clinical
study (n = 161). The positive agreement in patients with symptoms greater than seven days was 60% (30/50)
and negative agreement was 98% (109/111). Therefore, negative results in patients with symptom onset greater
than seven days should be interpreted with caution, as the sensitivity of the assay decreases over time.
ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE
Limit of Detection (Analytical Sensitivity)
BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test limit of detection (LOD) was determined by evaluating
dierent concentrations of heat inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus. Presumed negative natural nasal swab
specimens were eluted in PBS. Swab eluates were combined and mixed thoroughly to create a clinical
matrix pool to be used as the diluent. Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus was diluted in this natural nasal swab
matrix pool to generate virus dilutions for testing.
Contrived nasal swab samples were prepared by absorbing 20 microliters of each virus dilution
(1,125TCID
50
/mL) onto the swab. The contrived swab samples were tested according to the test
procedure.
The LOD was determined as the lowest virus concentration that was detected ≥ 95% of the time (i.e.,
concentration at which at least 19 out of 20 replicates tested positive).
The BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test LOD in natural nasal swab matrix was confirmed
140.6TCID
50
/mL in the test. Based upon the testing procedure for this study the LOD of
140.6TCID
50
/mL in the test equates to 22.5 TCID
50
/swab.
Limit of Detection (LoD) Study Results
Concentration
TCID
50
/mL
Number
Positive/Total
% Detected
140.6 20/20 100%
Omicron Testing
The performance of this test device in the detection of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated in
a dilution series of clinical specimens which were positive for the Omicron variant. This testing was conducted
by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a component of the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics
(RADx
®
) initiative. Specimen pools were prepared by the RADx team using pooled clinical samples from
currently circulating Omicron strains and tested by RADx
®
to assess performance with the Omicron variant.
Results from this dilution series cannot be compared to any devices tested with a dierent specimen pool
and do not indicate that a test will have dierent clinical performance compared to other EUA authorized
tests. Compared to an EUA authorized RT-PCR method, the Binax NOW COVID-19 Ag Card detected
100% of live virus Omicron samples at a Ct-value of 28.7 (n=5). Testing was also compared to additional EUA
authorized OTC antigen tests (Assay #1 and Assay #2). Omicron dilutions at lower viral concentrations (Ct-
values greater than 28.7) were not detected by the Binax NOW COVID-19 Ag Card in this study.
Omicron Pool 1 – Live
Omicron Clinical
Samples
Average N2
Ct (n=9)
Assay #1
Percent
Positive
(n=5)
Assay #2
Percent
Positive
(n=5)
Binax NOW
COVID-19 Ag Card
Percent Positive
(n=5)
Dilution 1 19.9 100 100 100
Dilution 2 21.0 100 100 100
Dilution 3 22.3 100 100 100
Dilution 4 23.4 100 100 100
Dilution 5 25.0 100 100 100
Dilution 6 26.6 100 100 100
Dilution 7 27.3 0 100 100
Dilution 8 28.7 0 0 100
Dilution 9 30.1 0 0 0
Dilution 10 31.0 0 0 0
Dilution 11 32.1 0 0 0
Cross Reactivity (Analytical Specificity) and Microbial Interference
Cross reactivity and potential interference of BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test was evaluated
by testing 37 commensal and pathogenic microorganisms (8 bacteria, 14 viruses, 1 yeast and pooled
human nasal wash) that may be present in the nasal cavity. Each of the organism, viruses, and yeast were
tested in triplicate in the absence or presence of heat inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus (45 TCID
50
/swab). No
cross-reactivity or interference was seen with the following microorganisms when tested at the concentration
presented in the table below.
Potential Cross-Reactant Test Concentration
Virus
Adenovirus 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Rhinovirus 1.0 x 10
5
PFU/mL
Enterovirus/Coxsackievirus B4 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Human coronavirus OC43 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Human coronavirus 229E 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Human coronavirus NL63 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Human parainfluenza virus 1 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Human parainfluenza virus 2 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Human parainfluenza virus 3 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Human parainfluenza virus 4 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Influenza A 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Influenza B 1.0 x 10
5
TCID
50
/mL
Respiratory Syncytial Virus A 1.0 x 10
5
PFU/mL
Potential Cross-Reactant Test Concentration
Bacteria
Bordetella pertussis 1.0 x 10
6
cells/mL
Chlamydia pneumoniae 1.0 x 10
6
IFU/mL
Haemophilus influenzae 1.0 x 10
6
cells/mL
Legionella pnuemophila 1.0 x 10
6
cells/mL
Mycoplasma pneumoniae 1.0 x 10
6
U/mL
Streptococcus pneumoniae 1.0 x 10
6
cells/mL
Streptococcus pyogenes (groupA) 1.0 x 10
6
cells/mL
Mycobacterium tuberculosis 1.0 x 10
6
cells/mL
Staphylococcus aureus 1.0 x 10
6
org/mL
Staphylococcus epidermidis 1.0 x 10
6
org/mL
Pooled human nasal wash N/A
Yeast Candida albicans 1.0 x 10
6
cells/mL
To estimate the likelihood of cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV-2 virus in the presence of organisms that
were not available for wet testing, In silico analysis using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST)
managed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) was used to assess the degree of
protein sequence homology.
• For P. jirovecii one area of sequence similarity shows 45% homology across 18% of the sequence,
making cross-reactivity in the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test highly unlikely.
• No protein sequence homology was found between M. tuberculosis, and thus homology-based cross-
reactivity can be ruled out.
• The comparison between SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein, MERS-CoV and human coronavirus HKU1
revealed that cross-reactivity cannot be ruled out. Homology for KHU1 and MERS-CoV is relatively low,
at 37.8% across 95% of the sequence and 57.14% across 87% of the sequence, respectively.
High Dose Hook Eect
No high dose hook eect was observed when tested with up to a concentration of 1.6x10
5
TCID
50
/mL of
heat inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus with the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test.
Endogenous Interfering Substances
The following substances, naturally present in respiratory specimens or that may be artificially
introduced into the nasal cavity or nasopharynx, were evaluated with the BinaxNOW
COVID-19 Antigen Self Test at the concentrations listed below and were found not to affect
test performance.
Substance Active Ingredient Concentration
Endogenous
Mucin 2% w/v
Whole Blood 1% v/v
OTC Nasal Drops Phenylephrine 15% v/v
OTC Nasal Gel
Sodium Chloride
(i.e. NeilMed)
5% v/v
OTC Nasal Spray 1 Cromolyn 15% v/v
OTC Nasal Spray 2 Oxymetazoline 15% v/v
OTC Nasal Spray 3 Fluconazole 5% w/v
Throat Lozenge Benzocaine, Menthol 0.15% w/v
OTC Homeopathic Nasal Spray 1
Galphimia glauca, Sabadilla,
Lua opperculata
20% v/v
OTC Homeopathic Nasal Spray 2
Zincum gluconium
(i.e., Zicam)
5% w/v
OTC Homeopathic Nasal Spray 3 Alkalol 10% v/v
OTC Homeopathic Nasal Spray 4 Fluticasone Propionate 5% v/v
Sore Throat Phenol Spray Phenol 15% v/v
Anti-viral Drug
Tamiflu
(Oseltamivir Phosphate)
0.5% w/v
Antibiotic, Nasal Ointment Mupirocin
1
0.25% w/v
Antibacterial, Systemic Tobramycin 0.0004% w/v
1
Testing demonstrated false negative results at concentrations of 5 mg/mL (0.5% w/v). Standard dose of
nasal ointment: 20 mg (2% w/w) of mupirocin in single-use 1-gram tubes.
Usability Study
Abbott conducted a study to evaluate whether a home user can follow instructions and
successfully perform the test steps for the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test,
including nasal swab collection at home, and correctly interpreting the results.
100 home users, including individuals (n=50) and caregivers (n=50), participated in the study. Each
individual or caregiver pair participated in a 60-minute session with a single proctor. The usability
evaluation session included one simulated use of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test and
opportunities to provide feedback.
92% (92 out of 100) home users produced a valid result (all negative) and 8 participants produced an
invalid result.
Abbott Diagnostics Scarborough, Inc.
10 Southgate Road
Scarborough, Maine 04074 USA
www.binaxnow-selftest.abbott
© 2023 Abbott. All rights reserved.
All trademarks referenced are trademarks of either the Abbott group of companies
ortheirrespective owners.
IN195151 Rev. 6 2023/11
SAP: 40004151
100% (99 out of 99) of the home (individual and caregiver) participants correctly understood that failure
to follow the test steps correctly would potentially lead to an invalid or inaccurate result or would require
another test or consultation with a healthcare provider. (One participant was inadvertently not asked this
question by the moderator during the session).
eInstruction Usability Study
The sponsor also submitted an usability study for the eInstruction. The goal of the usability
study was to demonstrate that lay users can use paper instructions or digital (mobile app or
website) instructions (i.e., paper Quick Reference Guide (QRG), digital app Quick Reference
Instructions (QRI), or website electronic Instructions for Use (eIFU)) to perform the test
steps for the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test successfully.
The study was conducted at usability labs in Chicago, IL, USA on June 15 - June 23, 2021.
A total of 60 lay users, including individuals (n=30) and caregivers (n=30), participated in
the study. Each individual or caregiver pair participated in a 6-minute session with a study
moderator. The usability evaluation session included one simulated use of the BinaxNOW
COVID-19 Antigen Self Test, knowledge tasks, and opportunities to provide feedback.
SYMBOLS
This symbol indicates that the product is for single use only. It is not to be
re-used.
www.globalpointofcare.eifu.abbott
This symbol indicates that you should consult the instructions for use.
This symbol indicates that the product has a temperature limitation.
This symbol indicates the name and location of the product manufacturer.
This symbol indicates the product’s catalog number.
IVD
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use.
This symbol indicates the total number of tests provided in the kit box.
TECHNICAL SUPPORT ADVICE LINE
US