Md Helal Uddin, Md Maruf Hasan
68
(JCSR) Journal of Comparative Study of Religions
argues that such a statement cannot be believable for religious text
regarding the author of the Gospel. Still, it is for sure that Christians
have corrupted the original Gospel.
162
When Abdullah Jahangir studied the treatise Pobitra Bible, it is
viewed that he presented three observations as an unspoken reason
for the corruption of the original Gospel. Writing books by religious
persons inspired by the “Holy Spirits” and preaching in the name of
Jesus, false propaganda against a religious person or a Prophet should
not be considered a forgery and false publicity in the name of Jesus
apostle Paul. Abdullah Jahangir states that Apostle Paul misled the
Christian mind, corrupted the original Gospel, wrote fake Gospel, and
preached in Jesus’s name. Hence, Paul is responsible for the Gospel
forgery and should be condemned.
163
It is documented that since
then, many rulers have aacked, persecuted, tortured the follower
of Jesus, and occupied the area where they lived. Simultaneously,
religious places of worship were destroyed, Scriptures were burned,
religious gures were murdered, and even the city of Jerusalem was
burned down several times by the then superpower country recorded
in history. It is nowhere recorded that anyone after Jesus saved the
Gospel, memorized it, or narrated it frequently. Christians claim
somebody has wrien after Jesus, which is baseless and cannot prove
the authenticity of the Gospel of Jesus. Although it is claimed that
Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John wrote the Gospel as a proponent of
Jesus, there is no credible or authentic evidence or logical record of
the scriptures they wrote, except for the controversy, contradictions,
and falsehood.
164
After the revelation of the Qur᾿ān, thousands of Muslims
memorized it, preserved it in writing, and when the Qur᾿ān ’ was
wrien in a text, it was rigorously scrutinized. Similarly, before
compiling the Ḥadīth, a thorough examination was strictly performed,
such as the reliability of the narrator of the Ḥadīth, the number
of narrators, the chain of narrators, and the quality of the Ḥadīth.
Nevertheless, no method has been found to preserve and compile
the book of the Bible like the Qur᾿ān and Ḥadīth. Hence, to what
extent the Christians and Jews claim regarding the authenticity of
162
Rahmatullah Kairanawi, Izharul Haqq, 41
163
Abdullah Jahangir, Pobitra Bible, 148-151
164
Ibid., 153