Sales practices
A GUIDE FOR BUSINESSES AND LEGAL PRACTITIONERS
2 Sales practices
This guide was developed by:
Access Canberra, Australian Capital Territory
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Consumer Affairs Victoria
Consumer and Business Services South Australia
Consumer, Building and Occupational Services, Tasmania
New South Wales Fair Trading
Northern Territory Consumer Affairs
Queensland Office of Fair Trading
Western Australia Department of Commerce, Consumer Protection
Copyright
© Commonwealth of Australia 
March 
Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication
Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the
Commonwealth of Australia (referred to below as the Commonwealth).
Creative Commons licence
With the exception of the Australian Consumer Law logo, photographs and images, this publication is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form license agreement that allows you to copy,
distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is
available from www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/./au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from
www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/./au/legalcode
The Commonwealth’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following
wording: Source: Licensed from the Commonwealth of Australia under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence.
The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the content of this publication.
Inquiries regarding this licence and any other use of this document are welcome at:
Manager
Communications
The Treasury
Langton Crescent Parkes ACT 2600
Email: medialiaison@treasury.gov.au
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 3
Contents
Introduction 5
About this guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
About the other guides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
About the Australian Consumer Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Unsolicited supplies 7
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
What are unsolicited supplies?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Requesting payment for unsolicited goods or services . . . . . . 8
Must someone who receives unsolicited goods or services pay? . . 8
Requesting payment for unauthorised entries or advertisements . . 9
Unsolicited credit or debit cards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Penalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Unsolicited consumer agreements 11
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
What is an unsolicited consumer agreement? . . . . . . . . . . 11
Kiosks and stalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Fundraising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Permitted hours for contacting consumers . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Suppliers’ obligations when calling on consumers . . . . . . . . 13
Requirements for face-to-face and telemarketing approaches . . . 14
When unsolicited consumer agreement laws do not apply . . . . . 19
Supplier responsibility for failing to comply . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Penalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Pyramid schemes 20
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
What is a pyramid scheme? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Marketing scheme or pyramid scheme? . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Penalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Pricing 22
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Multiple pricing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Penalties—displayed price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Component pricing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Penalties—component pricing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Lay-by agreements 25
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
What is a lay-by agreement? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Requirements for lay-by agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
When a consumer cancels a lay-by agreement . . . . . . . . . . 25
Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers . . . . . . . . . . 26
Penalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4 Sales practices
Contents continued
Referral selling 27
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
What is referral selling? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Penalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Harassment and coercion 28
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
What is harassment and coercion? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Penalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
‘Proof of transaction’ and itemised bills 30
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
What is proof of transaction? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Supplier must provide proof of transaction . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Itemised bills for services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Penalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Warranties, refunds, repairs– ‘consumer guarantees’ 31
Glossary and abbreviations 32
Contacts 34
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 5
Introduction
About this guide
This is one of six guides to the Australian
Consumer Law (ACL), developed by Australia’s
consumer protection agencies to help businesses
understand their responsibilities under the law.
This guide will help businesses and legal
practitioners understand the sales practices
requirements of the ACL.
It covers unsolicited supplies, unsolicited
consumer agreements (door-to-door and
telemarketing), lay-by agreements, pricing, proof
of transaction and itemised bills, referral selling,
pyramid schemes, harassment and coercion.
These guides:
explain the law in simple language but are no
substitute for the legislation
give general information and examples—not
legal advice or a definitive list of situations
where the law applies
include examples of the ACL’s application by
Australian Consumer Protection regulators
and by Australian courts.
About the other guides
Other guides in this series cover:
Consumer guarantees
Covers supplier, manufacturer and importer
responsibilities when there is a problem with
goods and services; refunds, replacements,
repairs and other remedies.
Avoiding unfair business practices
Covers misleading or deceptive conduct,
unconscionable conduct, country of origin,
false and misleading representations.
Unfair contract terms
Covers what an unfair term is and which
contracts are affected by the law.
Compliance and enforcement
Covers how regulators enforce the ACL.
Consumer product safety
Covers safety standards, recalls, bans, safety
warning notices and mandatory reporting
requirements.
Further information and copies of these and other
publications are available from the Australian
Consumer Law website www.consumerlaw.gov.au
6 Sales practices
Introduction continued
About the Australian Consumer Law
The ACL aims to protect consumers and ensure
fair trading in Australia.
The ACL came into force on 1 January 2011 and
replaced the Trade Practices Act 1974 and
previous Commonwealth, state and territory
consumer protection legislation. It is contained in
Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act
2010 (Cth) (CCA) and is applied as a law of each
state and territory by state or territory legislation.
Under the ACL, consumers have the same
protections, and businesses have the same
obligations and responsibilities, across
Australia.
Australian courts and tribunals (including those
of the states and territories) can enforce the ACL.
The regulators of the ACL are:
the Australian Competition and Consumer
Commission (ACCC), in respect of conduct
engaged in by corporations, and conduct
involving the use of postal, telephonic and
internet services; and
state and territory consumer protection
agencies, in respect of conduct engaged
in by persons carrying on a business in,
or connected with, the respective state or
territory.
Some of the consumer protection provisions in
the ACL are mirrored in the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth)
(ASIC Act) in relation to financial products
and services. The Australian Securities and
Investments Commission (ASIC) is responsible
for administering and enforcing the ASIC Act.
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 7
Unsolicited supplies
Summary
It is unlawful to:
request payment for unsolicited goods or
services
request payment for unauthorised entries or
advertisements
send unsolicited credit cards or debit cards.
A business or person must not issue an invoice
that states an amount to be paid for unsolicited
goods or services, unless:
they reasonably believe they have a right to
be paid; or
the invoice contains the warning required by
law, which must be the most prominent text in
the document: ‘This is not a bill. You are not
required to pay any money’.
The maximum civil and criminal penalties for
requesting such payment or failing to include the
warning notice on an invoice are:
$1.1 million for a body corporate; and
$220,000 for an individual.
ACL reference: sections , –
What are unsolicited supplies?
‘Unsolicited supplies’ are goods or services
supplied to someone who has not requested to
buy or receive them.
Unless a business or person reasonably believes
that they have the right to do so, it is unlawful to:
request payment for unsolicited goods or
services, such as books, magazines or DVDs
posted to someone who did not request the
items
request payment for unauthorised entries
or advertisements, such as sending a bill to
a business for an advertisement about its
services, if that business did not authorise its
publication.
It is also unlawful to send unsolicited credit
cards or debit cards.
However, if there is no expectation of payment it
is lawful to supply unsolicited goods or services,
such as sending a free product sample.
It is unlawful to request payment for
unsolicited goods or services.
8 Sales practices
Unsolicited supplies continued
Requesting payment for unsolicited
goods or services
A business or person does not have a right to
be paid just because they have sent goods or
provided services to someone.
A business or person must not issue an invoice
that states an amount to be paid for unsolicited
goods or services, unless:
they reasonably believe they have a right to
be paid; or
the invoice contains the warning required
by the ACL Regulations: ‘This is not a bill.
You are not required to pay any money. This
warning must be the most prominent text in
the document.
In a dispute, the business or person demanding
payment must prove they have a legitimate right
to it.
CASE STUDY
A business and its sole director were
ordered to pay penalties of $50,000 each
for a number of contraventions, including
asserting a right to payment for unsolicited
goods. The business sent demands for
payments for ink cartridges, for which the
recipients had never agreed to purchase,
including by misrepresenting to the
recipients’ employees that there was an
existing supply relationship.
Legal reference: Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission v Artorios Ink Co Pty Ltd
(No ) [] FCA 
Must someone who receives
unsolicited goods or services pay?
Someone who receives unsolicited goods or
services does not have to pay for those goods
or services. They also do not have to pay for any
loss or damage to the goods, or due to supply of
the service.
However, they may have to pay compensation if
they wilfully and unlawfully damage unsolicited
goods within three months of receiving them,
called the recovery period. The supplier can
recover the goods within this time.
The recovery period reduces to one month when
the recipient gives written notice to the supplier,
which must state:
the recipient’s name and address
that the goods are unsolicited and the
recipient does not want them; and
where the supplier should collect the items.
The recipient can keep unsolicited goods not
collected within the recovery period without any
obligation to pay. The supplier cannot take action
to recover the uncollected goods.
EXAMPLE
A tradesperson is hired to replace rotting
timber beams supporting a pergola. The
tradesperson notices the shed door is also
rotting, so replaces it and adds $250 to the
bill. Replacing the shed door was outside the
scope of their agreement and unsolicited. The
consumer does not have to pay the extra $250.
A packet of Christmas cards arrives in the
mailbox of a consumer, who has not asked
for them. The envelope is addressed to her
and includes a letter that says she can either
pay for them or return the packet by post.
She does not have to pay for the cards. She
also does not have to return them. She needs
to keep the cards safe and can give written
notice to the sender explaining that the goods
were unsolicited and the address where they
can be collected. If they are not collected
after one month, the cards become hers. If
the consumer does not send a notice, the
goods become hers after three months if they
are not collected by the sender in that time.
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 9
However, the recipient cannot:
keep goods they knew were not intended for
them—for instance, if the package was clearly
addressed to another person
unreasonably refuse to allow the supplier to
collect the goods during the recovery period.
Requesting payment for
unauthorised entries or
advertisements
It is unlawful to ask for payment for an entry
or advertisement relating to a person or their
profession, business, trade or occupation,
that was not first authorised by the person or
business concerned.
An advertisement or entry is authorised when the
person, business or their nominee has signed a
document that:
authorises the entry or advertisement
specifies the details of the entry or
advertisement, the name and address of the
person publishing the entry, and the charges
that will apply; and
was provided before payment was requested.
It is possible to send an invoice for an
unauthorised entry or advertisement if it
contains the warning statement required by
the ACL regulations, which must be the most
prominent text in the document: ‘This is not a
bill. You are not required to pay any money’.
In a dispute, the business or person demanding
payment must prove it was reasonable to believe
the entry or advertisement was authorised.
CASE STUDIES
Three men phoned businesses and
pressured them to pay for advertising they
had not ordered. The men led businesses
to believe the advertisements would run
in publications supporting worthy causes
in the community, but no proceeds went to
assist the community or to community-based
activities. Businesses were threatened
with legal action if they did not pay, and
consequently many businesses did pay.
In March 2007, the Federal Court of Australia
sentenced the men, who had ignored a court
order to stop running an invoice scam, to
six months’ imprisonment suspended for
two years, permanently restrained them
from selling advertising in any publication
or online, and ordered that they pay costs of
$180,000. The Federal Court order prevents
the men involved from engaging in similar
operations anywhere in Australia.
Legal reference: Bauer v Power Pacific
International Media Pty Ltd [] FCA 
A company which purported to sell
advertising operated a business where
its sales staff made unsolicited phone
calls to Australian small businesses about
advertising in its publications. The sales
staff led the businesses to believe that the
publications were widely distributed and had
an affiliation with charities and community
groups, which was false. After the phone
call, even if the business did not agree to
take out an advertisement, the company
posted a copy of the advertisement as
published in their publication with an invoice
seeking payment. If the business did not
pay the amount outlined in the invoice, the
company made follow-up calls demanding
payment for the unwanted and unordered
advertising.
In March 2013, the Federal Court of Australia
ordered the operators behind the scam (the
company and two individuals) to pay a total
of $750,000 in penalties.
Legal reference: Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission v Adepto Publications
Pty Ltd [] FCA 
10 Sales practices
Unsolicited supplies continued
Unsolicited credit or debit cards
Generally, an issuer must not send a credit or
debit card without written authority from the
recipient.
An item is a credit card if intended to be used to
obtain cash, goods or services on credit.
An item is a debit card if intended to be used to
access an account held by the consumer for the
purpose of withdrawing or depositing cash or
obtaining goods or services.
Issuers must not send anything that could be
used as a credit or debit card to someone unless:
the recipient requested, in writing, the card
from the issuer; or
it is a replacement, renewal or substitution
for a card previously sent to the person and
used for the same purpose.
An issuer must not enable a credit card to also
be used as debit card, or vice versa, unless the
recipient has requested this in writing.
More information about unsolicited credit and
debit cards is available in Regulatory Guide 201
by ASIC at www.asic.gov.au
Penalties
The maximum civil and criminal penalties for
requesting payment for unsolicited goods
or unauthorised advertisements, for failing
to include the required warning notice on an
invoice, and for sending an unsolicited debit or
credit card are:
$1.1 million for a body corporate
$220,000 for an individual.
…an issuer must not send a credit or
debit card without written authority
from the recipient.
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 11
Unsolicited consumer agreements
Summary
Salespeople who make unsolicited contact
with consumers in order to sell them goods or
services must comply with:
limited hours for contact with consumers
disclosure requirements when making an
agreement
criteria for the sales agreement, including
that it must be in writing
restrictions on supplying services, supplying
goods above a certain value, and on
requesting payment during the cooling-off
period.
Consumers have 10 business days to change
their mind and cancel the contract (cooling-off
period). They can also cancel the contract within
three or six months if the supplier has not met
certain obligations.
The Corporations Act 2001 also prohibits
unsolicited hawking of securities, certain
financial products and managed investment
products. More information is available from
ASIC at www.asic.gov.au
Failing to comply with requirements for
unsolicited consumer agreements can lead
to maximum civil and criminal penalties of
$50,000 for a body corporate and $10,000 for
an individual.
ACL reference: sections –, –
What is an unsolicited consumer
agreement?
An agreement for the supply of goods or services
is unsolicited when:
a supplier, their salesperson or dealer
telephones or approaches a consumer at a
location other than the suppliers premises,
without invitation from that consumer
the agreement results from those
negotiations (even if those were not the only
negotiations that led to the agreement); and
the total value of the goods or services
is more than $100, or the value was not
established when the agreement was made.
For example, unsolicited consumer agreements
may result from:
door-knocking households to sell goods or
services, or to ask consumers to switch to a
different service provider
telephoning consumers to sell goods or
services
approaching consumers in the common area
of a shopping centre to sell goods or services.
A consumer agreement is also considered
unsolicited if it is negotiated under the following
circumstances:
the consumer gave his or her contact details
to a supplier for one purpose (for example, a
competition entry), and the supplier contacts
the consumer for another purpose (the
negotiation of the sale of goods or services); or
the consumer returns a missed call from a
supplier or responds to any unsuccessful
attempt by the supplier to contact the
consumer.
A consumer who has invited a supplier to provide
a quote for certain goods or services—for
example, measuring for blinds—is not soliciting
the supplier to actually sell them those goods or
services. If the supplier does negotiate a sale at
the time the quote is provided, this would be an
unsolicited consumer agreement.
12 Sales practices
Unsolicited consumer agreements continued
EXAMPLE
A consumer enters a competition sponsored
by a supplier. It is a condition of entry that
the consumer agrees to be contacted by the
supplier with information about the product.
If the supplier contacts the consumer about
anything other than the competition or the
product, and negotiates a sale, that sale
agreement is considered ‘unsolicited’.
A supplier leaves a quote for the consumer
to consider. The supplier does not initiate or
negotiate an agreement with the consumer
to purchase the goods or services at the
time the quote is provided. The consumer
approaches the supplier to accept the quote
or negotiate different terms, which leads
to an agreement. This is not an unsolicited
consumer agreement, because the consumer
initiated the contact.
The above agreement would be unsolicited
if the supplier had negotiated it with the
consumer when they provided the quote.
In a dispute, it is up to the supplier to prove that
the consumer solicited the agreement.
Kiosks and stalls
A sale made at a kiosk or stall in a public area
such as a shopping centre is unlikely to be an
‘unsolicited consumer agreement when:
the kiosk or stall is the operators business or
trade premises; and
the salesperson remains within the kiosk or
stall.
If the salesperson were to approach or intercept a
consumer and negotiate a sale outside the kiosk
or stall, this would be an unsolicited consumer
agreement.
A kiosk or stall that is partly or fully enclosed,
and subject to an ongoing lease that marks out
the area allocated to the kiosk or stall operator,
is more likely to be seen as business or trade
premises.
A sale made at an unenclosed trestle table or
temporary stand may be more likely to be an
unsolicited consumer agreement.
Fundraising
An unsolicited consumer agreement must
involve a supply in trade or commerce of goods
or services to a consumer. This means donations
to charity are not unsolicited consumer
agreements—including donations received by a
third party or contractor on the charitys behalf.
However, if a contractor or someone else
supplies goods or services worth $100 or more
on behalf of a charity to a donor in return for the
donation, and this supply was an express part
of the agreement, this will be an unsolicited
consumer agreement.
EXAMPLE
A consumer is approached on the street
by a person collecting donations on behalf
of a charity. The consumer provides a
donation which includes signing up to an
agreement that includes direct debiting
monthly payments from the consumer’s bank
account. This is not an unsolicited consumer
agreement as the money is provided to
charity and no goods or services were
received in return for the donation.
Fundraising is covered by state and territory
legislation in addition to the ACL.
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 13
Permitted hours for contacting
consumers
Permitted hours for telemarketing are regulated
under the Telecommunications Act 1997 and
associated telemarketing standards. The
standards do not allow telephone and fax
marketing to consumers:
on a Sunday or a public holiday
before 9am or after 8pm on a weekday
before 9am or after 5pm on a Saturday.
Other forms of contact, such as door-knocking,
are regulated by the ACL. Under this law, a
salesperson must not call on a consumer to
negotiate a sale:
on Sunday or a public holiday
before 9am or after 6pm on a weekday
before 9am or after 5pm on a Saturday.
Some states and territories have different hours,
contact the relevant consumer protection agency
for more information—see Contacts on page .
A salesperson can visit at any time if an
appointment was made beforehand with the
consumer’s consent. This appointment must be
arranged by telephone or in writing—it cannot be
made in person.
Suppliers’ obligations when calling
on consumers
Salespeople or dealers who call on a consumer,
other than by telephone, must:
explain up-front the purpose of the visit and
produce identification
inform the consumer that they can ask them
to leave
leave the premises immediately if the
consumer asks them to do so
explain to consumers before the agreement is
made, and in writing, their right to terminate
the agreement within 10 business days
(cooling-off)
provide their contact details in the
agreement.
Similar obligations apply when contacting
consumers by telephone—see Requirements for
face-to-face and telemarketing approaches on
page .
It is unlawful to coerce or unduly harass someone
about the supply of, or payment for, goods or
services—see Harassment and coercion on
page .
Disclose purpose and show identification
Before giving a sales pitch, a salesperson or
dealer must clearly inform the consumer of the
purpose of the visit and provide identification
including their name and the supplier they
represent, as prescribed in the ACL regulations.
Cease to negotiate
A salesperson must explain that they are
required to leave the consumer’s premises upon
the consumers request.
When a salesperson is told to leave, they must
not contact the consumer on behalf of the same
supplier again for at least 30 days. However, a
salesperson can visit the same consumer about
the sale of goods or services on behalf of a
different supplier.
If a consumer visibly displays a sign on their front
door or front gate that states that unsolicited sales
calls are unwelcome (a ‘Do not knock’ sign), this
represents a request to leave. If a salesperson
ignores such a sign, they are in breach of the ACL
and committing trespass. ‘Do not knock’ signs and
‘No door-to-door traders’ stickers are available to
order for free from consumer protection agencies.
14 Sales practices
Unsolicited consumer agreements continued
CASE STUDY
A salesperson acting on behalf of energy
company AGL approached a consumers
house that had a ‘Do not knock’ sign clearly
displayed on the front door. The sign had an
image of a fist knocking with a line through
it and the words ‘DO NOT KNOCK Unsolicited
door-to-door selling not welcome here’. The
salesperson continued to knock on the door
and began to negotiate an agreement to
supply energy with the consumer. The ACL
requires salespeople to leave immediately on
the request of the occupier or consumer with
whom they are negotiating.
In December 2013 the Federal Court
determined that the presence of a ‘Do not
knock’ sign is a clear and unambiguous
request to leave the premises without
knocking on the consumer’s door. The
Court also ordered by consent that AGL
and its marketing company pay a total of
$60,000 in penalties for illegal door-to-door
sales practices and for failing to leave a
consumer’s premises despite the presence of
a ‘Do not knock’ sign.
Legal reference: Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission v AGL Sales Pty Ltd
[] FCA ; Australian Competition &
Consumer Commission v AGL Sales Pty Ltd (No )
[] FCA 
Contact details
An agreement signed by a salesperson on the
supplier’s behalf must state:
that the salesperson is acting on the
supplier’s behalf
the salesperson’s full name, business or
residential address (not a post box); and
email address (if they have one).
Requirements for face-to-face and
telemarketing approaches
When a salesperson negotiates an unsolicited
consumer agreement:
the salesperson must inform the consumer of
their termination rights before the agreement
is made
the consumer must be given a written copy of
the agreement
the written agreement must meet specific
requirements—see The sales contract on
page 
both parties must sign the agreement and any
amendments.
Information about the consumers termination
rights must be given to them in writing and
must be:
attached to the agreement
transparent—expressed in plain language,
legible and clear
the most prominent text in the document,
other than the text setting out the dealers or
supplier’s name or logo.
During the cooling-off period for an unsolicited
consumer agreement, a supplier must not:
provide any services
supply any goods with a total value of over
$500
accept any payment.
This does not apply to sales for the supply
of electricity or gas to premises not already
connected to such services.
If goods are supplied, and the consumer
exercises their cooling-off rights, the goods
become unsolicited supplies—see Unsolicited
supplies on page .
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 15
CASE STUDIES
Energy Australia was ordered to pay
penalties of $1.2 million and three marketing
businesses engaged by it to conduct its door-
to-door sales activities were penalised an
aggregate of $290,000 for multiple breaches
of the ACL, including the unsolicited
consumer agreement provisions. The Federal
Court found that some door-to-door sales
representatives had failed to:
>> advise the consumer, clearly or at all, that
their purpose was to seek the consumer’s
agreement to a supply of retail electricity
by the energy company
>> advise the consumer, clearly or at all, that
they were obliged to leave the premises
immediately if the consumer requested
they do so
>> in one instance, leave a premises
immediately on the request of the
consumer, in circumstances where the
consumer had a ‘do not knock’ sign
displayed
>> provide information relating to their
identity.
Legal reference: Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission v Energy Australia Pty Ltd
[] FCA 
In 2013, the Magistrates Court in Queensland
fined a supplier $20,000 and ordered it to
pay compensation of $18,724.74 for failing
to provide the prescribed notice required for
unsolicited agreements and for non-supply
of the systems.
The supplier, Cleaner Energy, contacted
consumers via unsolicited phone calls to sell
solar power systems, panels and inverters.
Cleaner Energy encouraged the consumers to
sign agreements immediately and requested
deposits ranging from $1500 to $5000, which
were taken at the time of the call or shortly
after.
The agreements did not provide the
consumers with information about their
rights to cancel during the cooling-off period
or include the specified text on the front
page. On some occasions, Cleaner Energy
gave the consumers a timeframe as to when
their systems would be installed, however
they were never installed.
Legal reference: Queensland Office of Fair Trading
v Aaron Murray as Chief Executive Officer of
Cleaner Energy Pty Ltd [] MAG–/()
The sales contract
Consumers must be given a copy of an
unsolicited consumer agreement.
If negotiated in person, the copy must be given to
the consumer immediately after it is signed.
If negotiated by telephone, the copy must be
given to the consumer:
in person, by post, or electronically (if the
consumer agrees)
within five business days of the agreement (or
longer if the consumer agrees).
The document must be:
transparent—expressed in plain language,
legible and clear
printed—although any changes to the
agreement may be handwritten (and signed
by both parties).
The document must clearly state:
the consumers cooling-off and termination
rights
the full terms of the agreement
the total price payable, or how this will be
calculated
any postal or delivery charges
the suppliers:
– name
business address (not a post box number)
Australian Business Number (ABN) or
Australian Company Number (ACN)
fax number and email address, if they
have these.
The front page of the document must include the
following text:
‘Important Notice to the Consumer
You have a right to cancel this agreement
within 10 business days from and including
the day after you signed or received this
agreement
‘Details about your additional rights to cancel
this agreement are set out in the information
attached to this agreement.
The front page must also be signed by the
consumer and include the date it was signed.
The document must also be accompanied by a
notice that the consumer can use to terminate the
contract.
16 Sales practices
Unsolicited consumer agreements continued
CASE STUDY
In 2014, communications company Startel
Communication was ordered to pay penalties
totalling $320,000 for failing to inform
consumers that they could terminate the
contract within 10 business days, failing
to supply documents which would help
consumers decide whether they wanted to
proceed with the contract, and taking money
out of bank accounts during the cooling-off
period.
Legal reference: Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission v Startel Communication Co
Pty Ltd [] FCA 
Attempts to limit termination rights are unlawful
It is unlawful to exclude, limit, modify or restrict:
the right of the consumer to terminate the
agreement
the effect or operation of the ACL as it relates
to unsolicited consumer agreements.
Any attempts to do so in an agreement have no
effect.
ACL reference: section 
CASE STUDY
In March 2013, the Magistrates Court
in Queensland fined a supplier $3000
and ordered it to pay a further $3000
compensation for breaching door-to-door
trading laws.
The supplier visited a consumer’s house
without invitation, commenced negotiations
and provided a quote to spray seal bitumen
on a driveway for $3000. A single page
written document outlining the date and the
supplier’s business details was provided to
the consumer. The supplier wrote ‘paid’ on
the document however the consumer had not
paid. One part of the document was titled
Terms of Contract, however no information
was completed under this section. Both
the supplier and the consumer signed the
bottom of the document.
The supplier did not provide the consumer
with information on their right to terminate
the agreement during the termination period
(10 business days) and the supplier did not
advise the consumer that payment could
not be provided during this period. The
prohibited 10 business day period would
have commenced on the first business day
after the agreement was made. The next day
the supplier spray sealed the driveway and
requested a $3000 bank cheque from the
consumer as payment. The supplier cashed
the cheque on the same day.
Legal reference: Queensland Office of Fair
Trading v Graham Edward Devine []
MAG/()
Waivers not permitted
A consumer cannot waive any rights under
the ACL that relate to unsolicited consumer
agreements.
ACL reference: section 
It is unlawful for any supplier to persuade, or
attempt to persuade, a consumer to do so.
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 17
Cooling-off and termination requirements
Consumers who agree to unsolicited agreements
have 10 business days to reconsider, during
which they can cancel the agreement without
penalty. This is called the ‘cooling-off’ period.
ACL reference: sections , 
For agreements negotiated by telephone, the
cooling-off period begins on the first business
day after the consumer receives the agreement
document.
For other agreements, the cooling-off period
begins on the first business day after the
agreement was made.
A business day is classified as a Monday,
Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday or Friday and
does not include public holidays.
A consumer may also terminate an agreement up
to three months after it was made (or received,
for agreements negotiated by telephone) if the
salesperson:
visited outside permitted selling hours
did not disclose the purpose of the visit
did not produce identification; or
did not leave the premises upon request.
The termination period is extended to six months
if the salesperson:
did not provide information about cooling-off
rights
breached requirements for unsolicited
consumer agreements (such as failing to
provide a written copy or not including
required information)
supplied goods with a total value of over $500
during the 10 business days of the cooling-off
period
supplied services during the 10 business days
of the cooling-off period; or
accepted or requested any payment during
the 10 business days of the cooling-off period.
A consumer may terminate an agreement verbally
or in writing. The termination date is when the
consumer gives or sends the notice.
When a consumer ‘cools off’ or terminates
An agreement terminated by a consumer during
the cooling-off period is void—effectively
cancelled, or treated as if it never existed.
ACL reference: sections , , ,  and 
If the consumer terminates an unsolicited
consumer agreement, the agreement is void:
whether or not the supplier receives written
notice of termination
even if the goods or services supplied have
been wholly or partly consumed or used.
When a consumer terminates an unsolicited
consumer agreement, any related contract or
agreement is void. This includes associated
credit or finance agreements.
Where goods or services are bought under
a credit contract that is tied to the purchase
of the goods or services, it is the suppliers
responsibility to contact the credit provider and
arrange for cancellation. For more information,
contact ASIC at www.asic.gov.au
EXAMPLE
A consumer approached by a door-to-door
trader agrees to buy a washing machine for
$900. The consumer has 10 business days to
change their mind. As part of this sale, there
is an associated agreement to service the
washing machine. If the consumer cools-off
on the $900 contract to buy the washing
machine, the related service contract is also
cancelled.
A supplier must promptly return or refund any
money paid under an agreement or related
contract when a consumer cools-off.
If the consumer has terminated the unsolicited
consumer agreement, the supplier cannot:
take action against the consumer to recover
any money allegedly payable under the
agreement or any related contract
place or threaten to place the consumers
name on a list of defaulters or debtors.
18 Sales practices
Unsolicited consumer agreements continued
A consumer who terminates an unsolicited
agreement must, within a reasonable time, return
any goods that have not been consumed or tell
the supplier where to collect them.
If a consumer has not taken reasonable care of
the goods, the supplier can seek compensation
for the damage to the goods or the drop in
value. The consumer does not have to pay
compensation for normal use of the goods or
circumstances beyond their control.
EXAMPLE
A consumer buys an electric mixer from a
door-to-door trader who does not tell her
about the cooling-off period. Four months
later, the consumer realises she had the right
to cool-off. She decides that she would not
have followed through with the purchase had
she known she could cool-off. She writes to
the supplier, requests a full refund and asks
the supplier to collect the appliance. She has
prepared several desserts during the four
months, so the mixer blades are not in their
original condition. The supplier is not entitled
to compensation for the blades, as this was
normal use of the mixer.
If a supplier does not collect the goods within
30 days after a contract was terminated, and
the consumer told the supplier where to collect
the goods, the goods become the consumers
property.
If an agreement is terminated after the cooling-
off period, and a service has been provided to
the consumer in that time, the consumer may
have to pay for the service.
EXAMPLE
A telemarketer sells a carpet cleaning
package to a consumer. The package includes
a clean every three months for a special price.
The salesperson fails to tell the consumer
about his cooling-off rights. After the first
clean, which occurred three weeks after
agreement was entered into, the consumer
realises the salesperson did not provide
information about his rights and decides to
end the agreement. The consumer must pay
for the carpet cleaning already carried out,
but is released from the contract and any
obligation for the remaining two cleans.
Supplying goods or services during the cooling-
off period
During the cooling-off period, a supplier must not:
supply any goods priced over $500 relating to
the agreement
supply services relating to the agreement
accept or require any form of payment.
ACL reference: section 
However, during the cooling-off period, goods
priced up to $500 may be supplied. An energy
supplier can also provide electricity or gas to
premises not already connected to such services,
or where there is already a connection but no
supply.
CASE STUDY
In 2014, the Federal Court ordered a
telecommunications company, which entered
into agreements with consumers following
negotiations by telephone, to pay a penalty
of $225,000 after it found that the company
had breached the unsolicited consumer
agreement provisions of the ACL by:
>> failing to provide consumers with a copy of
their contract within five business days
>> failing to provide consumers with
an agreement that clearly stated the
companys address and informed
consumers of their cooling-off rights
>> failing to provide consumers with a notice
to cancel the contract and
>> supplying services to consumers during
the 10 day cooling-off period.
Legal reference: Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission v Zen Telecom Pty Ltd
[] FCA 
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 19
When unsolicited consumer
agreement laws do not apply
Unsolicited consumer agreement laws do not
apply in some instances, including:
where a person does not meet the definition
of a consumer under the ACL, that is, in cases
where the good or service exceeds $40,000
and is not of a kind ordinarily acquired for
personal, domestic or household use
discontinued negotiations, where a consumer
asks a dealer or supplier to leave but later
contacts the supplier
party plan events, when the host makes it
clear that a consumer is invited to the party to
be sold something, and at least three people
are invited to the event
renewal of contracts, when a business
contacts a consumer and asks if they want
to renew an existing contract (for example, a
home telephone contract)
when the agreement is not with a consumer—
for example, the agreement is with someone
who is buying goods to on-sell or to use to
manufacture something else
subsequent contracts with the same
consumer for the same kind of goods or
services.
When a consumer enters into an unsolicited
consumer agreement with a particular supplier or
dealer, and those goods or services are actually
supplied, the supplier or dealer does not need to
comply with the unsolicited consumer agreement
provisions for any other sales of the same kind to
that consumer during the next three months.
However, these extra sales must not add up to
more than $500.
Any unsolicited approach for sale of goods or
services over the $500 limit must comply with the
laws on unsolicited consumer agreements—as
must any unsolicited approach made after three
months from the date the goods or services were
supplied under the initial agreement.
For other exemptions, see Regulation  of the
ACL regulations.
Supplier responsibility for failing to
comply
A supplier cannot enforce an unsolicited
consumer agreement if the supplier or the
supplier’s dealer—for instance, a telemarketer or
door-to-door salesperson—has breached the law
on unsolicited consumer agreements.
Both the supplier and their salesperson or dealer
may be liable for the breaches.
Suppliers are responsible for ensuring their
salespeople and other representatives are fully
aware of their legal obligations when using
unsolicited marketing approaches.
ACL reference: sections , 
Penalties
Failing to comply with unsolicited consumer
agreement requirements can lead to maximum
civil and criminal penalties of $50,000 per
contravention for a body corporate and $10,000
per contravention for an individual.
20 Sales practices
Pyramid schemes
Summary
Pyramid schemes make money by recruiting
people rather than by selling a legitimate product
or providing a service.
Pyramid schemes are illegal. A business or
person must not participate in, or persuade
others to participate in, a pyramid scheme.
A court can consider several factors to identify a
pyramid scheme.
Criminal and civil penalties apply.
ACL reference: sections , 
What is a pyramid scheme?
Pyramid schemes make money by recruiting
businesses or people rather than by selling a
legitimate product or providing a service—even if
they are also selling a product.
New participants make a payment, known as
a ‘participation payment’, to join. They are
promised payments for recruiting other investors
or new participants. Pyramid schemes inevitably
collapse when they fail to attract new members
to join. New members rarely make money;
they usually lose the money they have paid to
participate.
It is unlawful to participate in, or to persuade
someone to participate in, a pyramid scheme.
There are two payments associated with a
pyramid scheme:
a participation payment (to one or more
existing participants in the scheme) to join
a recruitment payment, promised when a
member recruits others.
These payments may be a financial or non-
financial benefit, paid either to the new
participant or to someone else.
The recruitment payment helps define a pyramid
scheme—it must be the only, or main reason, a
member joins.
A pyramid scheme may also have any or all of the
following characteristics:
participation payments may (or must) be
made when joining the scheme
a participation payment may not be the only
requirement for taking part
a new investor may not have a legally
enforceable right to the promised recruitment
payments
arrangements are not usually in writing
the scheme may involve promoting and
selling goods or services (or both).
Marketing scheme or pyramid
scheme?
To distinguish between a pyramid scheme and
other promotions that may be legitimate, a court
considers:
the value of the participation payments
compared with any goods or services that
participants are entitled to receive under the
scheme
the emphasis placed on participants
entitlement to receive goods or services
under the scheme, compared with the
emphasis on their entitlement to receive
future recruitment payments
whether recruitment payments are the only
or main reason a new participant becomes
involved.
The ACL does not limit the matters a court can
consider when working this out.
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 21
EXAMPLE
A consumer must pay $1000 upfront to
participate in a new internet business. This
payment entitles him to 1000 shares, which
can only be sold back to the company or to
other participants after 12 months.
The consumer is promised $100 in cash
immediately for recruiting new people to the
scheme. He attends a 90-minute promotional
seminar about the scheme. The presenter
spends 70 minutes on how to recruit new
investors and 20 minutes on the internet
business.
The following characteristics help to define
this as a pyramid scheme:
the shares are frozen for 12 months
it pushes recruitment very hard
recruitment payments are a substantial
reason to join.
Penalties
A business or person must not participate in, or
attempt to persuade others to participate in, a
pyramid scheme.
The maximum civil and criminal penalties are
$1.1 million for a body corporate and $220,000
for an individual.
ACL reference: sections , 
CASE STUDIES
Three individuals participated in a
company in the direct-selling industry
which claimed to bring consumers superior
travel and hospitality products and
services. These individuals were actively
and heavily promoting the company to
consumers through websites and Facebook,
encouraging people to participate in the
scheme. People who wished to participate
were required to pay a membership fee of
$330. Once an individual had paid the $330,
they received a ‘travel certificate’ and the
opportunity to receive commission payments
for recruiting other people into the scheme.
It was found that the vouchers were of little
to no value and that the only way a person
could earn income from their participation
in the scheme was from recruiting new
members. The three individuals were fined
penalties totalling $200,000.
Legal reference: Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No )
[] FCA 
A business operated in Australia as the
owner of an exclusive distribution licence
for etching products which it claimed would
safeguard vehicles and home contents from
theft. The business was active in several
states, under a model whereby investors
were given the title of state director,
who would then incorporate a company
within that state with rights to distribute
the products. Further employees were
then recruited and were required to make
recruitment payments to the director, even
if no products had been sold. The director of
the business was banned from managing a
company or promoting business activities or
opportunities for five years.
Legal reference: Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission v Stott [] FCA 
22 Sales practices
Pricing
Summary
Multiple pricing
A supplier who displays multiple prices for the
same goods must either:
sell the goods for the lowest ‘displayed price’
withdraw the goods from sale until the price
is corrected.
A price published in a catalogue or
advertisement is a ‘displayed price’.
Mistakes in catalogues and advertisements
can be fixed by publishing a retraction in a
publication with a similar circulation to the
original advertisement.
Component pricing
A supplier must not promote or state a price that
is only part of the cost, unless also prominently
advertising the single price.
ACL reference: sections –, –
Multiple pricing
A supplier who displays the same item with more
than one price—‘multiple pricing’—must sell it for
the lowest displayed price or withdraw the goods
from sale until the price is corrected. This applies
regardless of where the price is displayed—for
example, in a catalogue, online or in a television
advertisement. The supplier is not obliged to sell
the goods at the lowest price as they have the
option of withdrawing them from sale until the
price is corrected.
The ‘displayed price’ is a price:
attached to or on:
the goods
anything connected or used with the
goods
anything used to display the goods
published in a catalogue available to the
public, when:
the deadline to buy at that price has not
passed
the catalogue is current
that reasonably appears to apply to the
goods, including a partly-obscured price; or
displayed on a register or scanner.
A price is not a ‘displayed price’ when it is:
entirely obscured by another price
a price per unit of measure and shown as an
alternative means of expressing the price
not in Australian currency, or unlikely to be
interpreted as Australian currency.
A price published in a catalogue or
advertisement ceases to be a displayed price
when a retraction is published to a similar
circulation or audience.
If a supplier specifies that a catalogue price
applies only in a particular region, they can
display a different price in a catalogue for
another region.
Penalties—displayed price
Failing to sell goods for the lowest displayed
price can lead to maximum civil and criminal
penalties of $5000 for a body corporate and
$1000 for an individual.
Component pricing
A supplier must not promote or state a price that
is only part of the cost, unless also prominently
advertising the single (total) price.
This applies to the supply and promotion of
goods or services usually used for personal,
domestic or household use or consumption.
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 23
EXAMPLE
An electrical goods retailer advertises a
60cm LCD television for $1990**. In fine print
at the bottom, it states this price excludes
commission and warehouse retrieval fees.
The commission is $100 and warehouse
retrieval fee is $50. These are known costs
and part of the single price.
The television should have been advertised
for either a single price of $2140, or with each
extra cost listed along with the total. The
single price should be as prominent as the
component prices.
A component price is one that is represented to
be only part of the cost. If a business represents
that part of the cost is the total cost, then this
may contravene other provisions such false or
misleading representations in relation to the
price of goods or services.
The single price must be:
clear at the time of the sale
as prominent as the most prominent
component of the price.
The single price is the total of all measurable
costs and includes:
any charge payable; and
the amount of any tax, duty, fee, levy or
charges (for example, GST).
CASE STUDY
The Federal Court imposed a penalty of
$200,000 against AirAsia for contravening
the single pricing provisions. For 10 months,
AirAsia did not display on its website some
airfare prices inclusive of all taxes, duties,
fees and other mandatory charges in a
prominent way and as a single figure.
Legal reference: Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission v AirAsia Berhad Co
[] FCA 
A single price is not required when advertising
exclusively to a body corporate—see Glossary
and abbreviations on page .
A single price for services supplied under a
contract that allows periodic payments does
not have to be displayed as prominently as the
component prices.
Components that do not need to be included in a
single price are:
optional extras—additional charges that
a consumer may choose to pay. However,
if an optional extra is depicted in the
advertisement, you must include the price for
that optional extra
EXAMPLE
A supplier advertises lounge suites for sale.
At the point of sale consumers can pay extra
for fabric protection, which does not form
part of the single price because the consumer
can choose whether to pay the extra charge.
sending/delivery charges—while mandatory
charges for sending or delivering products
need to be specified in the advertisement,
they do not have to be included in the
total price (unless the supplier is aware
of a minimum charge that must be paid).
You could, however, choose to do so. It is
important to note that in the regulators’
view, ‘dealer delivery’ as currently imposed
within the motor vehicle industry would be
considered as a component of the single price
any components which are not quantifiable at
the time the representation is made
amounts your business pays to a third party
that are not passed on to the consumer
amounts a consumer is required to pay
directly to a relevant authority (such as in
used vehicle sales).
Determining whether a component is quantifiable
An amount is quantifiable if, at the time the
representation is made, it is able to be readily
converted into a dollar amount. If a total price
is comprised of a number of components, each
component must be quantified and added up to
the extent that it is possible.
Where a total price involves:
a combination of quantifiable and non-
quantifiable components; or
a component amount that fluctuates or varies
(e.g. changes in foreign currency)
the total price is calculated using those
components that are quantifiable at the time.
Consumers must also be clearly advised of the
basis on which the amounts were calculated, and
that they may change as not all components were
able to be included in the single price.
24 Sales practices
Pricing continued
Penalties—component pricing
The maximum civil and criminal penalties for
failing to comply with single price requirements
are:
$1.1 million for a body corporate
$220,000 for an individual.
CASE STUDY
A motor dealer in Queensland placed
advertisements in a local newspaper as
part of a four week campaign promoting
new vehicles for sale. The advertisements
had a picture of the vehicle with the price
above the picture in large colourful font.
Next to the vehicle price was a caret (^), with
further details provided at the bottom of
the advertisement in small, white font. E.g.
Holden VE Series 11 SV6 Sedans $24,990^.
The statement at the bottom of the
advertisement next to the caret (^) advised
that the prices excluded on-road costs,
government statutory charges and transfer
fees. The motor dealer was advertising
vehicle prices that were only part of the total
vehicle price, with no prominent reference
to the single price. As on-road costs,
government statutory charges and transfer
fees constitute additional costs, they must
be included in the single price.
In May 2013, the Queensland Office of Fair
Trading issued a civil penalty notice of $2040
to the motor dealer.
Exemption for restaurants and café menus
The ACL provides a conditional exemption from
the component pricing requirements to cafés
and restaurants.Café and restaurant menu
surcharges are not required to adhere to the
component pricing requirements, so long as
these conditions are met:
the menu displays a surcharge for the supply
of food or beverage on specified days by the
restaurant or café; and
the menu displays the following words ‘a
surcharge of [percentage] applies on [the
specified day or days]’; and
the prescribed words are displayed in a
transparent and prominent manner on the
menu.
The term ‘transparent’ is defined under the ACL
and requires information about pricing to be
expressed in reasonably plain language, legible,
presented clearly and readily available to the
target audience. The term ‘prominent’ is not
defined but has been interpreted as requiring
information to be conspicuously or noticeably
displayed.
Restaurants and cafés that rely on the exemption
must ensure that a consumer who looks at a price
on a menu can immediately determine that the
price displayed is not actually the final price that
they will be charged on specified days.
The exemption also applies to room service
menus and menus for banquets and other
events if the food and/or beverages delivered or
provided are not expected to be consumed at a
later time.
Restaurants and cafés should note that the
exemption applies only to menus. It does not:
apply to any other form of advertising, which
must continue to display the single price
of the goods and services including any
surcharge or other compulsory fee
cover goods other than food or beverages.
If any service charges are applied, such as
corkage or cover charges that are included
on a menu, they must have a single price
displayed for them at all times.
ACL reference: Regulation A
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 25
Lay-by agreements
Summary
Lay-by agreements must be in writing, expressed
in plain language, legible and clearly presented.
A consumer can cancel a lay-by agreement but
may have to pay a termination charge.
A supplier may only cancel a lay-by agreement
under certain circumstances.
ACL reference: section –
What is a lay-by agreement?
An agreement is a ‘lay-by’ if the consumer:
pays for the goods in at least three
instalments (when the agreement is
not stated as ‘lay-by) or in two or more
instalments (when the agreement states it is
‘lay-by); and
does not receive the goods until the full price
has been paid.
Any deposit paid by the consumer is an
instalment.
EXAMPLE
A consumer orders a Christmas hamper in
advance and agrees to pay for it by weekly
instalments over 11 months. This is a lay-by
agreement.
Lay-by agreements that are standard form
contracts may be covered by unfair contract
terms provisions.
ACL reference: Part –
Requirements for lay-by agreements
Suppliers must ensure a lay-by agreement
offered to a consumer:
is in writing
specifies all terms and conditions, including
any termination charge
is transparent, which means that it must be
expressed in plain language, legible and
clearly presented.
A lay-by agreement may not be transparent if, for
example, terms and conditions are hidden in fine
print or schedules, phrased in legal jargon, or
given in complex or technical language.
A supplier must give a copy of the agreement to
the consumer.
When a consumer cancels a lay-by
agreement
The consumer can cancel the lay-by agreement
any time before delivery of the goods. If the
consumer cancels, the supplier must refund
all amounts paid by the consumer, less any
termination fee that was clearly specified in the
lay-by agreement.
There is no set amount or percentage for a
termination fee, but it must not be more than
the suppliers ‘reasonable costs’ relating to
the agreement—for example, storage and
administrative costs, and the loss in value of
the goods between the time when the lay-by
agreement was entered into and when it was
terminated. What is ‘reasonable’ will depend
on the circumstances, and suppliers should be
prepared to justify claims for reasonable costs.
If the consumers lay-by payments do not cover
the termination charge, the supplier can recover
the outstanding amount as a debt. This should be
stated clearly and legibly in the lay-by agreement,
along with any other details of termination fees.
Failing to do so may breach the requirement that
lay-by agreements be transparent.
26 Sales practices
Lay-by agreements continued
EXAMPLE
In June, a consumer enters into a lay-by
agreement to buy a $600 winter coat and
pays instalments totalling $150. In August,
she decides to cancel the agreement and
asks for a refund of all payments. As retailers
discount winter coats to half-price in July, the
supplier can now only sell the coat for $300.
The termination charge could include an
amount to make up for the need to discount
the coat to $300. However, the details of the
termination charge would have to be set out
clearly and legibly in the lay-by agreement
so that the consumer is aware that they may
have to pay for such an amount.
The supplier cannot charge a termination fee if
the consumer cancelled because the supplier
breached the agreement. For example, after
the consumer has paid all instalments, the
supplier advises that the consumers goods were
damaged while in storage.
A supplier who cancels the lay-by agreement
cannot charge a termination fee.
Apart from the termination charge, a supplier is
not entitled to damages or any other remedy for
the termination of the lay-by.
Termination of lay-by agreements by
suppliers
Suppliers must not terminate a lay-by agreement,
except when:
the consumer has breached a term of the
agreement. For example, they failed to make a
scheduled payment on time
the supplier is no longer engaged in trade or
commerce; or
the goods are no longer available due
to circumstances outside the supplier’s
control (not because the supplier decided to
withdraw the goods from sale).
Penalties
A supplier will contravene the lay-by provisions
if they:
enter into a lay-by agreement without putting
it in writing
do not give the consumer a copy of the written
agreement
refuse to refund all of the consumer’s money
(except for the termination charge)
charge a termination fee that is higher
than the reasonable costs associated with
the agreement, or when the supplier has
breached the lay-by agreement.
Each contravention has maximum civil and
criminal penalties of $30,000 for a body
corporate and $6000 for an individual.
CASE STUDY
In October 2012, a consumer entered into
a written agreement with a supplier to
buy three horse floats and accessories
for $25,100. The consumer paid a deposit
of $6800 with periodic instalments to be
made weekly with final payment due and
payable on 19 November 2012. There was no
termination charge stated in the agreement.
On 6 November 2012 the consumer decided
to cancel the agreement and asked for a
refund of the deposit. The supplier refused to
refund the deposit and the consumer lodged
a complaint with the Queensland Office of
Fair Trading.
The court found the written agreement
entered into was a lay-by agreement and if
the supplier wished to retain the deposit, the
termination charge would have to be set out
clearly and legibly in the agreement so that
the consumer was aware of the amount to
pay if the agreement was cancelled.
In 2013, the Magistrates Court in Queensland
fined the supplier $1500 and he was ordered
to pay $6800 compensation for failing to
refund the consumer the deposit.
Legal reference: Queensland Office of Fair Trading
v Bruce Kalf trading as North Queensland Horse
Float Sales [] MAG-/()
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 27
Referral selling
Summary
It is unlawful to induce a consumer to buy
goods or services by promising benefits for
assisting the supply of goods or services to
other customers if the benefit depends on other
events, such as subsequent sales.
ACL reference: section 
What is referral selling?
Referral selling is when:
a consumer is induced to buy goods or
services by promises of a rebate, commission
or other benefit for supplying information that
helps the trader sell to other consumers; and
the consumer does not get the promised
benefit unless some other event happens
after the agreement is made—for example,
other consumers also buying goods or
services from the same supplier.
It is not ‘referral selling’ for a supplier to promise
a benefit for simply providing the names of
consumers or helping the trader supply goods,
where the benefit is not conditional upon any
other event occurring. For example, a supplier
may offer a gift voucher to consumers who
provide the names of their friends that may be
interested in the supplier’s product. The gift
voucher must not be offered on the condition
that it will only be given to the consumer if one of
their friends makes a purchase.
CASE STUDY
The promoters of a worm farm investment
scheme breached the prohibition on referral
selling because the scheme involved
membership of a profit sharing scheme,
under which monthly payments were made.
The level of profit shared amongst members
depended upon the growth of the scheme
membership and on the number of new
members which existing scheme members
could introduce to the scheme.
Legal reference: Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission v Bio Enviro Plan Pty Ltd
[] FCA 
Penalties
The maximum civil and criminal penalties
for referral selling are $1.1 million for a body
corporate and $220,000 for an individual.
28 Sales practices
Harassment and coercion
Summary
It is unlawful to use physical force, coerce or
unduly harass someone about the supply of, or
payment for goods or services.
ACL reference: section 
What is harassment and coercion?
It is unlawful to use physical force, coercion or
undue harassment in connection with the:
supply or possible supply of goods or services
payment for goods or services
sale or grant, or the possible sale or grant, of
an interest in land; or
payment for an interest in land.
Undue harassment means unnecessary or
excessive contact or communication with a
person, to the point where that person feels
intimidated, tired or demoralised.
Coercion involves force (actual or threatened)
that restricts another person’s choice or
freedom to act. Unlike harassment, there is no
requirement for behaviour to be repetitive in
order to amount to coercion.
Financial institutions are entitled to attempt
to collect debts but their conduct may be
undue harassment or coercion when it involves
frequent unwelcome approaches and requests
or threats for payment. Laws relating to privacy,
harassment and misleading or deceptive conduct
apply to all businesses—including debt collection
agencies.
EXAMPLES
A woman went into arrears on her credit card
debt when she lost her job and had to care for
her ill mother.
The bank sold the debt to a debt collection
company. The company told the woman that,
if she left Australia, she would not be able to
return while the debt was unpaid.
The company also obtained details and other
information about the woman’s family. They
did this by contacting her friend, pretending
the woman had applied for a home loan and
seeking information to verify her home loan
application.
The company used this information to
embarrass the woman and continued to call
her, despite her request that they contact her
through her financial counsellor.
The companys actions could be considered
harassment.
A retirement village was sold by its owners.
This led to a change in management. During
the transfer of ownership, an energy company
salesperson visited residents.
The door-to-door salesperson explained to
all residents that because the management
of the complex was changing, their power
would be cut off unless they changed
energy supplier. This would have to happen
immediately to maintain their power supply.
Almost all of the residents signed with the
new supplier. This created confusion for
the residents, causing issues with payment
plans, concessions, and multiple bills.
The salesman’s statements could be
considered coercion.
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 29
CASE STUDIES
In 2012, a parking business was found to
have engaged in undue harassment when
it threatened to take a motorist to court for
failing to make payment following the issue
of ‘payment notices’ where the parking
business was not able to issue a penalty or
fine and threatened court action.
Legal reference: Director of Consumer Affairs
Victoria v Parking Patrols Vic Pty Ltd
[] VSC 
A debt collection agency was found to have
engaged in undue harassment and coercion
when some of its employees personally
abused and threatened debtors and
threatened to reveal their position as debtors
to their relatives, friends, employers and
neighbours.
Legal reference: ASIC v Accounts Control
Management Services Pty Ltd [] FCA 
For more information about acceptable debt
collection practices, see Debt collection
guideline: for collectors and creditors. This joint
publication by the ACCC and ASIC is available
from www.accc.gov.au
Penalties
The maximum civil and criminal penalties for
harassment and coercion are $1.1 million for a
body corporate and $220,000 for an individual.
30 Sales practices
‘Proof of transaction’ and
itemised bills
Summary
Suppliers must provide proof of transaction to
consumers for goods or services valued at $75
or more. A GST tax invoice is sufficient proof of
transaction.
Consumers may request an itemised bill if the
value of the goods or services is less than $75.
ACL reference: sections –
What is proof of transaction?
Proof of transaction for supply of goods or
services to a consumer is a document that
states the:
identity of the supplier of the goods or
services
supplier’s ABN or ACN
date of the supply
goods or services supplied to the consumer
price of the goods or services.
Examples of proof of transaction include a:
GST tax invoice
cash register receipt
credit card or debit card statement
handwritten receipt
lay-by agreement
confirmation or receipt number provided for a
telephone or internet transaction.
Supplier must provide proof of
transaction
A supplier must give proof of transaction when a
consumer:
buys goods or services worth $75 or more
(excluding GST), as soon as practicable after
the transaction
asks for proof of transaction for goods and
services costing less than $75, within seven
days.
Itemised bills for services
A consumer can ask a supplier for an itemised bill
that shows:
how the price was calculated
the number of labour hours and the hourly
rate (if relevant)
a list of the materials used and the amount
charged for them (if relevant).
This request must be made within 30 days of
whichever happens later:
the services are supplied
the consumer receives a bill or account from
the supplier for the supply of the services.
The supplier must give the consumer the
itemised bill without charge, within seven days
of the request. It must be expressed in plain
language, legible and clear.
Penalties
The maximum civil penalties for failing to provide
consumers with a proof of transaction, or not
providing it within the required time, are $15,000
for a body corporate and $3000 for an individual.
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 31
Warranties, refunds, repairs
consumer guarantees
The ACL sets out protections for consumers
who buy goods and services from suppliers,
manufacturers and importers—the ‘consumer
guarantees’.
These consumer guarantees are a comprehensive
set of rights and remedies that apply when goods
and services are defective in certain ways.
A consumer has these rights regardless of any
other warranty provided by the supplier or
manufacturer.
For more information, see another guide in
this series—Consumer guarantees: a guide for
businesses and legal practitioners, available
from www.consumerlaw.gov.au
This guide includes:
what consumer guarantees apply to certain
goods and services
who is responsible for satisfying the
requirements of the consumer guarantees
when to offer a remedy, such as a refund,
repair or replacement.
32 Sales practices
Glossary and abbreviations
TERM DEFINITION
body corporate includes a company registered under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), an
incorporated association, a co-operative or an owners corporation.
business day Monday to Friday, except public holidays.
buy to take possession of something by hiring, leasing or buying it, or by
exchange or gift.
consumer
a person who buys:
any type of goods or services costing up to $40,000 (or any other amount
stated in the ACL Regulations)
goods or services costing more than $40,000, which would normally be
for personal, domestic or household use; or
goods which consist of a vehicle or trailer used mainly to transport goods
on public roads.
Australian courts have said that the following are not normally used for
personal, domestic or household purposes:
an air seeder—Jillawarra Grazing Co v John Shearer Ltd [1984] FCA 30
a large tractor—Atkinson v Hastings Deering (Queensland) Pty Ltd
[1985] 6 FCR 331
an industrial photocopier—Four Square Stores (QLD) Ltd v ABE Copiers
[1981] ATPR 40232 at 43,115.
goods include, among other things:
animals, including fish
gas and electricity
computer software
second-hand goods
ships, aircraft and other vehicles
minerals, trees and crops, whether on or attached to land
any component part of, or accessory to, goods.
liability an obligation to put right a problem—for example, fixing a defective product,
providing compensation or taking other action.
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 33
TERM DEFINITION
manufacturer includes a person who:
grows, extracts, produces, processes or assembles goods
holds him/herself out to the public as the manufacturer of goods
causes or permits his/her name, business name or brand mark to be
applied to goods he/she supplies
permits him/herself to be held out as the manufacturer by another
person; or
imports goods into Australia where the manufacturer of the goods does
not have a place of business in Australia.
remedy an attempt to put right a fault, deficiency or a failure to meet an obligation.
regulator the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission or state/territory
consumer protection agencies.
services include duties, work, facilities, rights or benefits provided in the course of
business, for example:
dry cleaning
installing or repairing consumer goods
providing swimming lessons
lawyers’ services.
supplier someone who, in trade or commerce, sells goods or services and is
commonly referred to as a ‘trader, ‘retailer’ or ‘service provider.
supply includes:
in relation to goods—supply (including re-supply) by way of sale,
exchange, lease, hire or hire-purchase
in relation to services—provide, grant or confer.
Abbreviations
ACCC Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
ACL Australian Consumer Law
ASIC Australian Securities and Investments Commission
ASIC Act Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth)
CCA Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
FCA Federal Court of Australia
MAG Magistrate Court
VSC Victorian Supreme Court
34 Sales practices
Contacts
Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission
GPO Box 3131
Canberra ACT 2601
T. 1300 302 502
www.accc.gov.au
Australian Capital Territory
Access Canberra
GPO Box 158
Canberra ACT 2601
T. 13 22 81
www.act.gov.au/accessCBR
New South Wales
NSW Fair Trading
PO Box 972
Parramatta NSW 2124
T. 13 32 20
www.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au
Northern Territory
Northern Territory Consumer Affairs
PO Box 40946
Casuarina NT 0811
T. 1800 019 319
www.consumeraffairs.nt.gov.au
Queensland
Office of Fair Trading
GPO Box 3111
Brisbane QLD 4001
T. 13 QGOV (13 74 68)
www.qld.gov.au/fairtrading
A guide for businesses and legal practitioners 35
South Australia
Consumer and Business Services
GPO Box 1719
Adelaide SA 5001
T. 131 882
www.cbs.sa.gov.au
Tasmania
Consumer Building and
Occupational Services
PO Box 56
Rosny Park TAS 7018
T. 1300 654 499
www.consumer.tas.gov.au
Victoria
Consumer Affairs Victoria
GPO Box 123
Melbourne 3001
T. 1300 55 81 81
www.consumer.vic.gov.au
Western Australia
Department of Commerce
Locked Bag 14
Cloisters Square WA 6850
T. 1300 30 40 54
www.commerce.wa.gov.au
Australian Securities and
Investments Commission
PO Box 9827 (in your capital city)
T. 1300 300 630
www.asic.gov.au
Government of Western
Australia
Department of Commerce
Consumer Protection