The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists:
Direct and Downstream Optimization
of Pediatric Patient and Family Outcomes
Jessika Boles, PhD, CCLS
Camille Fraser, MS, CCLS, CIMI
Katherine Bennett, MEd., CCLS
Maile Jones, MEd.(c), CIMI
Jenna Dunbar, MEd.(c), CIMI Ashlie
Woodburn, MEd., CCLS, CIMI Mary
Ann Gill, MEd.(c)
Anne Duplechain, MEd.(c)
Erin K. Munn, MS, CCLS, CIMI Katy
Hoskins, CCLS
Full Report | January 2020
Abstract
____________________________________________________________________________
Today’s value-based healthcare market demands that hospitals, clinics, and medical
professionals provide high quality care at sustainable costs for patients and payers alike. Top-
decile performers systematically target each dimension of the Quadruple Aim, registering
incremental yet cumulative gains (and savings) in safety, timeliness, effectiveness, efficiency
and equity in patient-and-family-centered care. These ambitious objectives require a
multidisciplinary approach, particularly when serving infants, children, adolescents and
emerging adults, and their families. Certified Child Life Specialists, as psychosocial healthcare
professionals with focused training in child development, family systems, and evidence-based
supportive interventions, are indispensable members of high-caliber healthcare teams. In
collaboration with medical and allied health professionals, Certified Child Life Specialists bring a
multifocal lens, individualized to the needs of pediatric patients and their families, grounded in
developmental theory, attuned to the influence of past and present trauma, and aimed at
building resilient family systems. Capitalizing on the power of therapeutic relationships and the
expansive benefits of play-based interventions, Certified Child Life Specialists help children,
youth, and families lay the foundation for lifelong health and wellness. In these ways, child life
professionals significantly reduce the financial, developmental, and psychological costs
associated with the discomfort and distress that persist far beyond each episode of care. By
doing so, Certified Child Life Specialists ensure a cost-effective experience for patients and
families that cultivates well-informed, actively engaged, loyal consumers of healthcare services
throughout the lifespan.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
____________________________________________________________________________
Introduction 2
Value Driver 1: Institutional Savings 7
Preparation 8
Procedural Support 8
Institutional Outcomes of Preparation and Procedural Support 9
Value Driver 2: Psychosocial Outcomes 11
Coping Skills Education 11
Managing Pediatric Pain and Distress 12
Comfort Positioning 14
Value Driver 3: Patient and Family Engagement 14
Communicating with Children 15
Diagnosis Education 16
Adherence-Promoting Interventions 17
Parent Engagement 19
Discharge Education and Health Literacy 20
Value Driver 4: Developmental Impacts 23
Developmental Assessment and Intervention 23
Dimensions of Play 25
School Reentry 28
Transitional Care 29
Value Driver 5: Healthcare Consumership 31
Pediatric Medical Traumatic Stress 31
Infant Mental Health and Attachment 33
Mental Health Outcomes in Childhood and Adolescence 34
Sibling Support 36
Legacy Building 37
Bereavement Support 38
Child Life in Community Settings 40
Cultivating Resilience 41
Conclusion 42
Acknowledgements 43
References 44
Contributors
66
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists: Direct and Downstream
Optimization of Pediatric Patient and Family Outcomes
____________________________________________________________________________
In the era of Pay-for-Performance and the
Quadruple Aim, healthcare providers,
payers, and organizations must do more, in
better ways, for less cost. Healthcare-
associated expenses in the United States
have risen at unsustainable rates, creating a
dynamic in which high-quality service
comes with a high price tag for both direct
and indirect stakeholders. Despite
multilevel, multifocal, and multidimensional
efforts, per capita healthcare costs in the
United States are rapidly approaching
double those of other developed nations -
without generating comparable
improvements in population health.
1-3
Pinpointing a singular root cause for the
industry’s transformation is problematic.
Even more challenging is identifying cost-
effective tactics that adequately broach the
“quality chasm”
4
omnipresent in healthcare
today. Patients and families now enjoy
unprecedented access to performance
ratings, comparative indices, and customer
reviews. When this transparency is coupled
with the sheer number of healthcare service
models available, institutions must
differentiate themselves from the
competition by investing in strategies that
improve care quality, maximize
reimbursement incentives, and instill
consumer loyalty. Emerging techniques and
technologies are quickly being adopted
across the industry; thus, expanding patient-
and-family-centered services is a prime and
promising opportunity to elevate the patient
experience. Certified Child Life Specialists
(CCLSs) - frontline members of
multidisciplinary care teams - create and
maintain an experience and culture within
pediatric healthcare that others cannot.
Prioritizing the coping and developmental
needs of pediatric patients and families,
CCLSs promote and protect emotional
safety in times of healthcare duress. Their
work is predicated on individualized
assessments of patient-and-family strengths
and stressors, alongside the illness and
treatment factors that threaten family
functioning and well-being. As they build
therapeutic relationships with infants,
children, youth, and families of all
circumstances and backgrounds, CCLSs
integrate their knowledge of child
development, family systems, and the
healing properties of play to promote
optimal physical and psychological health in
the face of stress-inducing healthcare
experiences.
5
In order to become a CCLS, individuals
must fulfill specialized academic
requirements, complete clinical training
hours under qualified supervisors, and
successfully pass a standardized
certification exam. Today’s CCLSs often
complete additional postgraduate work
and/or hold supplemental certifications in
related intervention sets (e.g., grief
counseling, infant massage, and patient
experience) to further refine their expertise
in providing high-quality, cost-effective, and
impactful psychosocial care for children and
their families. Although most prevalent in
the United States, Canada, and Japan,
CCLSs work in children’s hospitals and
healthcare settings across five continents;
2 | ACLP
the Association of Child Life Professionals
(ACLP) and its certifying body, the Child Life
Certification Commission (CLCC), maintains
a membership of more than 6,200 certified
professionals worldwide. Regardless of
geographic location or cultural setting,
CCLSs employ an individualized approach
that honors and serves patients and families
of all backgrounds, experiences, belief
systems, and preferences.
Certified Child Life Specialists are patient-
and-family-centered care professionals who
have established and raised the proverbial
bar for the patient experience movement in
healthcare settings.
6
Recognized by the
American Academy of Pediatrics,
7
the Beryl
Institute,
8
the Canadian Paediatric Society,
9
the Society of Critical Care Medicine,
10
The
Walt Disney Company,
11
and decades of
clinical research,
12-16
CCLSs exemplify a
high-yield investment in patient and family
experience, as well as in the direct and
downstream success of healthcare
institutions.
Certified Child Life Specialists integrate six
evidence-based domains to formulate
interventions that meet infants, children,
youth, and families where they are in their
healthcare experience. Combining 1) an
individualized approach to care, 2) a focus
on cultivating resilience, 3) cognizance of
the developmental contexts in which
children and families live and grow, and 4)
consideration for the impacts of past and
present trauma, CCLSs 5) establish and
develop therapeutic relationships by 6)
capitalizing on the expansive utility of play
(see Figure 1 below).
Figure 1. The Six Domains of Child Life Services.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 3
It is at the crux of these six domains that
CCLSs promote and optimize patient and
family outcomes throughout their healthcare
journey.
Individualized Approach.
Given the growing call for effective
psychosocial interventions in an
increasingly diverse patient population, a
core component of child life practice is
addressing the individual needs of children
and families to improve their care
experience. Certified Child Life Specialists
develop clinical partnerships with children
and families that make the healthcare
experience more empowering and positive;
they take an other-oriented stance that
reflects advocacy, cultural sensitivity, and
effective communication.
8
By recognizing
the importance of care that prioritizes and
responds to person-specific needs, CCLSs
integrate themselves into each unique
system to build rapport, cultivate trust, and
provide necessary psychological support
services to help patients and families
identify and achieve their goals. Through
careful and continuous observation of their
distinct characteristics, CCLSs to engage
patients and families in ways that build upon
their strengths and empower them as active
participants in their care. Taking this
collaborative, individualized approach,
CCLSs help patients and families master
their healthcare experience, promoting
improved psychological, physical, and
behavioral health outcomes.
Resilience-Focused.
Certified Child Life Specialists facilitate
psychosocial interventions that build and
fortify resilience in patients and families
facing healthcare challenges. Characterized
by maintaining personal well-being even
when enduring moments of stress,
adversity, and grief,
17,18
resilience is a
phenomenon capable of being both
threatened and enriched by healthcare
encounters. By capitalizing on the individual
and collective strengths of each child and
family, CCLSs reinforce and generate
adaptive coping skills,
19
positive
appraisals,
20
health-promoting behaviors,
21
problem solving skills, and goal setting
behaviors
22
- all of which are integral
features of resiliency. The patient-and-
family-centered approach CCLSs employ
includes the patient and their identified
family system in partnership with one
another, which achieves optimal trust and
alliance across providers and healthcare
settings.
23
Certified Child Life Specialists
acknowledge the importance of
relationships to bolster positive outcomes by
prioritizing opportunities for peer
connections,
24
optimizing family
functioning,
21
and cultivating therapeutic
clinical relationships with patients of all ages
and their family members.
17
In collaboration
with patients and families, CCLSs ensure
that healthcare experiences engender
resilience, thereby establishing the
foundation of both psychosocial and
emotional well-being for patients and their
families.
Developmentally Grounded.
Certified Child Life Specialists integrate
seminal and contemporary theories of child
and family development
25-34
to promote
coping and adaptation across the
developmental trajectory. Research has
long demonstrated that infants, children,
youth, and adults interpret and understand
medical information differently, often in
accordance with their evolving cognitive
capabilities and the contexts in which they
live and grow.
35-38
In turn, these individual
appraisals shape the ways in which children
4 | ACLP
and their families respond to and cope with
the stressors of healthcare encounters, and
inform pertinent assessment and
intervention practices.
39,40
Certified Child
Life Specialists, therefore, apply their
calibrated developmental lens and
contextual approach to ensure that
individual needs for education and coping
support are appropriately and sufficiently
met.
41-43
Certified Child Life Specialists also
operationalize their developmental expertise
to help healthcare teams anticipate patient
and family responses to healthcare
experiences, and partner with
multidisciplinary providers to extend the
supports families need for resilience and
recovery.
44-46
Trauma-Informed Care.
The philosophy of trauma-informed care
elucidates the impact of past and present
trauma in the lives of infants, children,
youth, and families - impacts that have far-
reaching consequences for developmental,
psychosocial, and mental health.
47,48
By
maintaining awareness of their prevalence
and potential manifestations, CCLSs
acknowledge, address, and mitigate the
risks of psychological trauma that are
associated with hospitalization
49
and other
adverse childhood experiences (ACES).
50
Existing on a continuum, ACEs involve
events and conditions that inflict or
exacerbate physical, psychological, and
relational distress,
50
thus encompassing
trauma that spans a multitude of social
environments, such as healthcare settings.
Certified Child Life Specialists have
practiced principles of trauma-informed care
long before the term was coined (e.g.,
understanding and facilitating physical and
emotional safety, establishing trusting
relationships, communicating honestly and
accurately, offering choice and control, and
using a strengths-based approach to care).
As the field has grown, CCLSs continue to
incorporate tools like therapeutic and
medical play, procedural support, and
preparation to decrease manifestations of
traumatic stress during and beyond
healthcare encounters.
43,47,48,51,52
Understanding that 62% of the population
has experienced at least one ACE and that
25% report at least three,
53
CCLSs assess
and account for ACEs when creating plans
of care. They incorporate approaches true
to the philosophy of trauma-informed care to
allay negative emotional reactions and
maladaptive stress responses (i.e., ACEs),
as well as the ways in which children and
their families interact with new or
unexpected medical events and ongoing
courses of treatment.
52,54
Relationship Oriented.
Defined as “a trusting connection and
rapport established between [clinician] and
[patient] through collaboration,
communication, empathy, and mutual
respect,”
55(p49)
therapeutic relationships
enhance child life interventions, decrease
stress symptoms, and increase positive
developmental and coping outcomes for
infants, children, youth, and their
families.
56,57
Relationships true to these
defining qualities facilitate better
engagement between clinicians, patients,
and families, particularly when formed
through active listening, question-asking,
and sensitive displays to emotional needs.
58
Through establishing these therapeutic
relationships, CCLSs enhance
communication, teach coping skills, and
build resiliency with and for patients and
families. Strong therapeutic relationships
enhance the quality of communication
between patients, families, and the broader
healthcare team, which not only improves
the accuracy and deliver
y of
the diagnosis
but also decreases the
frequency of
consumer-generated malpractice
claims.
57
Play-Based.
Often grossly unde
restimated and
misunderstood, yet
expansively beneficial,
play is among the most
effective tools used
by CCLSs to empower
children
and families
in coping with the
stressors of healthcare
encounters. When indi
vidually and
intentionally constructed
, play
-based
interventions have t
he power to normalize
an otherwise abnormal
healthcare
environment or
experience. Skilled play
partners and opportunities eq
uip children to
regulate their em
otions and manage their
behavioral responses w
hen faced with
painful or distressi
ng procedures, at times
replacing the need
for anesthesia or
sedatives. Thus, play-based psychosocial
care is a functional
, ef
fective means of
alleviating and preventing
trauma among
pediatric patients,
as play provides
distraction, red
uces anxiety, and facilitates
developmentally app
ropriate and effective
communication.
52
Play is empirically
supported as a signifi
cant opportunit
y for
promoting furthe
r social
-emotional,
cognitive, and langu
age development,
7,59,60
and within the scope of
child life practice,
CCLSs use play to asse
ss the
developmental needs
and potential medical
misconceptions of
pediatric patients and
their families.
Meeting the psycho
social needs of children
and families through i
ndividualized, play
-
based interventions,
CCLSs form strong
therapeutic rela
tionships that promote
resilience in developm
entally
-appropriate,
trauma-informed ways. I
n addition to the
personally-crafted care exper
ience they
deliver to infants,
children, youth, and
families, more than 40
years of clinical
research and practice de
monstrate that
Certified Child Li
fe Specialists:
1. Drive positive and effec
tive outcomes
for healthcare orga
nizatio
ns by
optimizing the
use of resources and
limiting waste.
2. Generate positive behavioral,
psychological, and physiol
ogical
outcomes through indivi
dualized
interventions wit
h pediatric patients.
3. Empower children and
families to
become informed and
active participants
in their healthcar
e experiences.
4. Promote and sustain opti
mal
developmental and
psychosocial growth
from infancy through
emerging
adulthood.
5. Improve populat
ion health by fostering
long-term patterns
of healthcare
consumership that reduce the risk of
preventable conditions.
Together, these f
ive value drivers produce
substantial outcom
es: significant cost
-
savings for all he
althcare stakeholders;
improved patient, f
amily, and population
health; enhanced pat
ient experience; and
heightened healthcare quality. (see Figure 2
below).
6 | ACLP
Children are often given sedation or general
anesthesia to complete routine procedures
and radiological scans - burdening
institutions and families with additional costs
and safety risks. When preparation and
procedural support are provided by CCLSs,
sedation and anesthesia use are
diminished, unnecessary expenses are
eliminated, and patient safety is maximized.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 7
Value Driver 1: Institutional Savings
____________________________________________________________________________
Certified Child Life Specialists drive positive and effective outcomes for healthcare
organizations by optimizing the use of resources and limiting waste. Children who receive
preparation and procedural support require less sedation and anesthesia, demonstrate less
emergence delirium, and consume less narcotic pain medication. As a result, patient safety,
access, and throughput are increased, while staffing costs and post-anesthesia length of stay
are reduced - and significant cost-savings are realized.
Figure 2. The Five Value Drivers of Child Life Services.
Preparation
Preparation, sometimes referred to as
psychological preparation or procedural
preparation, is a fundamental intervention
implemented by CCLSs in which children
and their families are provided with
developmentally appropriate information
about upcoming medical procedures and
experiences.
61
When equipped with this
accurate and honest information, even very
young patients (such as toddlers and
preschool-age children) and their families
are better able to adjust to and cope with
medical experiences.
62
Unlike other
multidisciplinary team members, CCLSs
have the education, training, and protected
time to provide high-quality preparation
interventions that align with individual
patient-and-family temperaments, learning
needs, and coping styles.
62
Certified Child Life Specialists incorporate a
variety of techniques in order to achieve
preparation intervention goals. The specific
method(s) of preparation utilized by a CCLS
vary dependent on an assessment of the
child and family as well as available
resources. Preparation interventions can
include: providing developmentally
appropriate description of the anticipated
sequence of events,
63
discussing the child’s
questions and concerns using age
appropriate language,
64
modeling elements
of the procedure,
65
medical play and
opportunities for the child to manipulate
medical equipment, dolls, and puppets,
66,67
leading coping strategy planning and
rehearsal,
68,69
watching puppet shows
67
or
videos,
61
conducting hospital tours,
70
reading fiction and/or non-fiction books that
intentionally address relevant stressors,
71
and providing relevant websites or media
resources for further information.
69
___________________________________
When preparation and procedural
support are provided by CCLSs,
sedation and anesthesia use are
diminished, unnecessary expenses
are eliminated, and patient safety is
maximized.
___________________________________
Throughout a preparation intervention,
CCLSs rely on observation, interaction, and
return demonstration to assess the child’s
developing understanding, as well as their
ability to cope with the procedure at hand.
70
When classified as high-quality, preparation
for children undergoing medical procedures
includes teaching through play and
modeling, coping skills training, provision of
procedural and sensory information, and
fostering emotional expression and trust.
72
A substantial number of studies indicate that
the effectiveness of preparation is highly
dependent on goodness-of-fit between the
specific needs of the child and family and
the teaching modalities utilized by CCLSs.
Thus, across this myriad of strategies, the
central benefit of preparation remains
consistent: patients and families cope more
effectively with what is understood and
expected, rather than what is uncertain and
unpredictable.
Procedural Support
Beyond preparation, CCLSs extend their
support techniques into the procedure room.
With their continued presence, CCLSs can
facilitate a child’s pre-established coping
plan during medical procedures, thereby
minimizing pain perceptions and potential
trauma. Distraction is a highly validated
technique utilized by CCLSs during
8 | ACLP
children’s medical procedures.
73,74
Defined
as a strategic effort to draw a child's
attention away from painful or distressing
stimuli, distraction techniques decrease pain
perceptions
75
and emotional distress
76
during invasive medical procedures.
Although distraction is a highly effective
component of procedural support, it is just
one of many tactics that CCLSs use to help
infants, children, and youth manage their
anxiety. For instance, CCLSs assess and
modify the procedural environment before
and throughout the child’s experience by
minimizing unnecessary sensory stimuli,
anticipating developmental stressors (e.g.,
concerns about privacy, needs for
autonomy and control, fears of strangers),
facilitating communication with the
healthcare team, and advocating for
individualized solutions.
Certified Child Life Specialists apply their
developmental assessment skills to identify
the most effective active, passive, or
combinatory distraction techniques for each
child. Active distraction encourages a child’s
engagement with a preferred stimulus
through physical movement or cognitive
processing. Examples include distraction
cards,
77
virtual reality,
78
interactive
applications on a computerized tablet,
75
or a
kaleidoscope.
79
Conversely, passive
distraction provides stimuli that does not
require the child's active engagement.
Audiovisual resources such as cartoons,
80
wall projections,
81
movies,
82
and music,
83
are examples of passive procedural support
approaches. When developing coping plans
with children and coaching them through
their identified coping techniques, CCLSs
invoke their developmental training to help
children confront their stressors while
simultaneously incorporating patient
preferences and adapting to procedural
elements.
73
Multidisciplinary collaboration is
vital in providing quality care during
procedures
84,85
; and when a CCLS is
present in these moments, nurses report
they are more able to tend to the medical
needs of the patient while still feeling
confident that the child’s coping needs are
being met.
86
When children’s needs are
anticipated and coping plans are enacted,
CCLSs transform potentially traumatic
procedures into empowering experiences
for infants, children, youth, and
parents/caregivers.
Institutional Outcomes of Procedural
Preparation and Support
The overlap of preparation and procedural
support is most profound in procedure-
oriented healthcare settings, such as
radiology and radiation-oncology, where
these interventions significantly lower
sedation rates among infants and children
who would otherwise require sedation to
successfully complete procedures and
scans.
61,87-92
Therefore, beyond the
demonstrated benefits for individual patients
and families, preparation and procedural
support also render gains for the provider
and facility performing the procedures. For
example, preparation programs, often
facilitated by CCLSs, demonstrate lower
rates of sedation and anesthesia, as well as
comparable rates of diagnostic-quality
image acquisition without increasing
procedure time.
68,71,87,93,94
Research
demonstrates that when preparation and
procedural support are provided in
conjunction with one another, patient
outcomes are improved and institutional
efficiency is optimized. Furthermore, when
provided by a CCLS, these interventions
address the individual needs of the patient
and account for their unique stressors and
developmental preferences. This patient-
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 9
specific approa
ch results in children being
significant
ly more likely to complete scans
with diagnost
ic quality images without
requiring
sedation or
general anesthesi
a,
thereby l
essening the need for repeat
procedures, red
ucing costs for the hospital,
and mitigat
ing negative emotional impact on
the child.
63,91,95
,96
Although chil
d life services are an
operational exp
ense, they result in
substantial
re
turn on inv
estment (ROI)
through the r
eallocation of valuable
anesthesia and staf
fing resources.
90,97-99
A
radiation oncology
program recorded
savings upwards
of $775,000 per year when
children parti
cipated in a play
-based
procedural prep
aration and suppor
t with
a
CCLS
92
; similarly,
a Magnetic Resonance
Imaging (
MRI) program reported an annual
net savings
of $117,870 following the
implementati
on of a mock scanner
preparation inter
vention.
87
For children
in
need of intr
a
-articular joi
nt injections,
preparation and procedu
ral support from a
CCLS gener
ated a 33% cost savings by
reducing the
need for deep sedation
- all
whilst mai
ntaining a 97.5% completion rate
in those cases pe
rformed without
sedation.
98
Additional
cost savings have
been observed i
n preoperati
ve settings,
with
preparation and p
rocedural support
interventions
yielding a 24% shorter length
of stay, ear
lier post
-procedural extubat
ion,
and a 14% reductio
n in emergence delirium
for those
receiving anesthesia.
69,100-102
These findi
ngs are of great s
ignificance
, as
when anesthesia or sed
ation are used in
infants, children,
and youth, safety
monitoring
and medical management needs
amplify, the
reby constraining institutional
resource reserves
and increasing staffing
costs.
103
When CCLSs a
ctively facilit
ate
preparation and p
rocedural support, larger
numbers are
served at greater efficiency,
improving accessi
bility and throughput for
both individual
s and institutions.
14,96
For
instance, children sche
duled for MRI without
sedation - in conjuncti
on with prep
aration
and procedural
support provided by a CCLS
- demonstrated
an order completion period
of 15 days,
compared to 46 days for those
scheduled wi
th sedation.
96
Even after
time
and materials
involved in preparation
interventions
are adjusted for, the overa
ll
cost of MRI
remains lower as a function of
the decrea
sed need for sedation and
shorter l
ength of stay (approximately three
hours less per
patient).
104
And, as cos
ts
decrease and re
source use is optimized,
high-quality heal
thcare is actualized.
In addition to red
ucing rates of anesthesia
and sedation duri
ng procedures,
preparation provide
d by CCLSs reduces
unnecessary m
edication use. For example,
preparation has
shown to decrease the
amount of narc
otic pain medications
pediatric pat
ients consume by up to
50%,
thereby r
educing waste, minimizing side
effects, and
helping prevent medication
misuse.
100
When parents
/caregivers partner
with CCLSs i
n providing preparation and
procedural suppor
t, studies have
demonstrated
a 28% reduction in the use of
oral Versed
©
(midazolam)
in pediatric
surgical patien
ts
- again, wit
hout increasing
length of preoper
ative or induction time.
105
In outpatien
t, non
-surgical setti
ngs,
procedural suppor
t interventions have
shown to be
equal to or more effective than
lidocaine an
d other
topical an
algesics in
aiding pati
ent coping, additionally reducing
care costs whi
le also improving patient and
family experi
ence.
82,101,1
06,107
Thus, when
CCLSs provide
preparation and procedural
support, t
hey decrease the need for
10 | ACLP
anesthesia, sedation, and narcotic pain
medication in pediatric patients, reduce the
risk of medical complications or adverse
events, and produce unparalleled cost
savings for healthcare facilities.
Value Driver 2: Psychosocial Outcomes
____________________________________________________________________________
Certified Child Life Specialists generate positive behavioral, psychological, and
physiological outcomes through individualized interventions with pediatric patients. They
implement an array of play-based, coping-focused techniques shown to ameliorate pain, lower
anxiety, reduce distress, and increase satisfaction with - and loyalty to - institutions of care.
Children demonstrate fewer behavioral disturbances during and beyond medical encounters
when receiving comprehensive preparation, procedural support, and coping skills education, all
of which are associated with accelerated healing.
Healthcare encounters and medical
procedures pose a multitude of threats to a
child’s psychological well-being, such as
disruption of normal routines and
relationships; separation from home, family,
and community; fear and uncertainty; pain;
and loss of control.
108-110
However, by
providing individualized, developmentally
appropriate, and resilience-oriented
interventions, CCLSs facilitate positive
coping, minimize distress, and optimize
patient and family outcomes.
Coping Skills Education
Coping skills education is an aspect of
preparation and procedural support with
benefits that transcend individual stressors,
situations, and settings.
72
Children’s
responses
to distressing events (e.g.,
illness, injury, or hospitalization) are largely
determined by their individual appraisals of:
1) the stressor at hand, and 2) their
perceived resources and abilities for
managing the stressor. Coping, then, refers
to an individual’s cognitive/behavioral
responses (both verbal/nonverbal and
active/passive) resulting from their
perceptions of stressors and self. Adaptive
(i.e., positive) coping strategies help
children and families manage their emotions
and respond effectively when stressed, but
multiple factors, including developmental
status, previous trauma exposure, and
cognitive or emotional fatigue, can influence
a child’s knowledge and use of coping
strategies.
22,111
When they are unable to
engage in adaptive coping strategies,
children and families experience
psychosocial distress or trauma, which then
jeopardizes illness management and
wellness outcomes.
17,22,112,113
While many possible coping mechanisms
exist, the most prominent - and powerful -
adaptive modality in childhood is
play.
43,114,115
Unfortunately, healthcare
events have been empirically shown to
disrupt children’s access to and ability to
engage in play; this leads to developmental
regression and coping difficulties,
116,117
as
well as altered levels of the stress
hormones (heightened cortisol and lowered
norepinephrine) associated with adverse
experiences and toxic stress.
118
In stressful
healthcare situations, play is the ideal
coping tool for children because it affords
them a sense of familiarity alongside
opportunities for active engagement,
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 11
control, an
d mastery.
114,115,
119
Engaging i
n
play is particularly ef
fective when designed
and facilitated
by trained professionals,
such as CCLS
s, boosting positive coping
behaviors and
optimizing outcomes.
119-122
Furthermo
re, CCLSs routinely o
ffer play-
based, family-centered c
oping skills
education t
o address both illness
- and non-
illness-related developm
ental and
psychosocial need
s. For example, CCLSs
construct t
herapeutic, child
-directed play
sessions that
encourage children to express
their emotions mo
re readily,
43
often util
izing
techniques simi
lar to those implemented
during prepar
ation and procedural support
interventions
.
Expanding t
he range and variety of coping
resources avail
able to patients and families,
CCLSs provide
additional skil
ls-based
coping interven
tions (e.g., problem solving,
communication
skills, deep breathing,
muscle relaxat
ion, distraction, imagery,
positive thinki
ng).
111,123-125
These
interventions
positively influence children’s
appraisals of t
he intra
- and interper
son
al
resources they
possess for managing
medical str
essors. Moreover, CCLSs
capitalize on t
he health benefits of social
support - a resource rea
dily available to
most patien
ts and families but at times
unrecognized
and untapped
- by offering
peer support
int
erventions t
o improve
coping, heal
th
-promoting beha
viors, and
patient sa
tisfaction.
44,126,1
27
These
interventions
are particularly effective for
adolescents, a pat
ient population for whom
peer interaction
is a primary driver of
socioemotional
development.
126,128
By
teaching, m
odeling, and facilitating adaptive
coping skill
s, CCLSs catalyze long
-term
benefits f
or children and families that
continue far
beyond the medical moment.
Selecting from
their repertoire of play
- and
skills-based tools
, CCLSs assess
psychosocial and develo
pmental risks and
strengths t
o support patients and families in
creating i
ndividualized coping plans.
125
Collaborative and pe
rsonalized
interventions
like these are linked to long
-
term imp
rovements in psychosocial well
-
being, infor
mati
on seeking, i
llness self
-
efficacy, il
lness knowledge, and treatment
adherence.
123-126,129
Especially be
neficial for
children with au
tism spectrum disorder
(ASD),
individualized coping plans have
been shown t
o improve patient and family
satisfaction and
red
uce procedur
al
distress.
130-133
Therefore, play-based coping
skills educat
ion is a cornerstone intervention
with which CCLS
s enhance patient
experience, encou
rage health
-promoting
behaviors, and nu
rture resilience.
Managing P
ediatric Pain and Distress
The impact o
f acute or chronic pain and
distress on
children’s psychosocial well
-
being is un
deniable. Hospitalized children
have been found
to experience an average
of 6.3 painful procedu
res each day,
134
and
without pr
oper pain management and
coping suppor
t, c
hildren can experie
nce
compounding distr
ess and long
-term
psychological seq
uelae such as needle
phobia.
135
This is especi
ally true for infants
as neural structures in
the developing brain
and pain pathways t
hroughout the central
nervous system
can be perma
nently alt
ered
by painful procedu
res, thereby heightening
pain sensations throu
ghout the lifetime.
136
When paired
with frightening or distressing
procedural exper
iences, these factors
understandabl
y influence an individual’s
approach to healthcar
e later in
life.
For example,
in day surgery, children’s peak
anxiety at t
he time of anesthesia induction
and increased di
stress during transitions in
12 | ACLP
care can persist for days and weeks
following the procedure.
108
When left
untreated, prolonged anxiety leads to
increased self-reported pain, behavioral
changes, consumption of more
acetaminophen and codeine following
hospital discharge, and greater risk of
emergence delirium
110
; specifically, higher
salivary cortisol (a physiological indicator of
stress) is connected to greater morphine
consumption.
142
However, children who
receive developmentally appropriate
preparation and procedural support show
significant decreases (upwards of 59%) in
perceived, measured, and observed pain
and distress
13,75,98,144-148
and, in some cases,
accelerated healing.
149
Developmentally appropriate and
individualized preparation and procedural
support provided by a CCLSs has the
capacity to lessen children’s healthcare
anxieties.
67,75,100-102,137-143
Studies
consistently demonstrate that without
preparation and procedural support, many
children not only experience acute distress,
but can also display negative behavioral
and psychological changes such as apathy,
withdrawal, separation anxiety, and sleep
disturbances. And, for nearly 30% of
pediatric patients, these difficulties will
persist for more than 14 postoperative
days.
109
However, when provided with
developmentally appropriate preparation
and procedural support, and guided through
selection and rehearsal of coping
techniques by a CCLS, children
demonstrate fewer problematic emotional
and behavioral changes.
70,143,148
More
specifically, studies have noted a decrease
in anger, aggressiveness, sleep problems,
concentration, hyperactivity, and impulsivity,
among children following surgery
66,141
with
impacts lasting up to 10 days post-
discharge
150
when these supports are
provided. Additionally, pediatric patients that
receive adequate preparation and
procedural support demonstrate improved
appetite and willingness to eat, and report
feelings of mastery, growth, and joy.
141,151
Preparation and procedural support not only
aid patients but also the entire family
system, including parents, grandparents,
legal guardians, and other caregivers. For
example, parents of children who receive
preparation and procedural support also
experience lower levels of distress and
significant decreases in anxiety over
time.
67,100,139-141,144,150,152-154
This reduction in
parental anxiety positively impacts the
child’s emotional response, given the direct
correlation between parent and child
distress in medical settings.
140
Thus, low
levels of parent and child distress improve
overall psychosocial outcomes at and
beyond the time of hospitalization.
13,76,155,156
___________________________________
However, children who receive
developmentally appropriate
preparation and procedural support
show significant decreases (upwards
of 59%) in perceived, measured, and
observed pain and distress
13,75,98,144-
148
and, in some cases, accelerated
healing.
149
___________________________________
From an experiential standpoint, preparation
and procedural support provided by CCLSs
improves the overall patient and family
experience. The anxiety- and stress-
reducing functions of such interventions
have shown to increase parent/caregiver
satisfaction with the care their child
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 13
received.
13,67,78
,98,101,139,140,143,148,150,157,158
Moreover, fa
milies are more likely to return
to or recommen
d the treating facility to
others when pr
ocedural support was
provided and are, t
hus, a cost
-effective and
organic marketing
mechanism for the
healthcare ins
titutions they serve.
81
Comfort Pos
itioning
Another w
ay CCLSs support children's
coping and family engag
ement during
procedures is t
hrough comfort positioning.
Comfort posi
tioning refers to the strategic
use of posit
ive parent/child touch to provide
safe, yet suppor
tive, immobilization during
procedures.
159
These positi
oning practices
stand in direct contr
ast to traditional
restraint tech
niques, which have shown to
increase anxiety, decr
ease perceived
feelings of
control, and hinder effective
coping.
160
For example
, the most common
position use
d during pediatric medical
procedures is t
he supin
e position, w
hich
requires the
child to be placed on their back;
however, r
emaining supine throughout such
an experience i
ncreases fear and
tearfulness,
making the child more likely to
become highly di
stressed.
161,162
Comfort posi
tions are an aspect of
procedural suppo
rt planning and
intervention
in which CCLSs purposively
offer paren
ts/caregivers an opportunity to
participat
e in their child’s care, which, in
turn, lessens
parent distress.
163
Children
indicate mor
e positive coping when
procedures occur
whi
le sitting
upright and
comforted by
their parent/caregiver, which,
again, increases pa
rent satisfaction.
162
Certified
Child Life Specialists also
understand
that the implementation of
comfort posi
tioning is dependent on multiple
factors - the child’s
age,
size, and abi
lities,
as well as the
type of procedure
- but that
the practice
itself reaps benefits for all ages.
For example,
even very young infants
placed in a pron
e position rather than a
supine posit
ion for a heel lance, cry less
and experience decreased pain and
distress.
164
Working in co
llaboration with
multidiscipl
inary teams,
CCLSs contr
ibute
an acute aw
areness of individualized,
evidence-based tacti
cs to promote adaptive
coping wit
h medical procedures, thereby
minimizing
distress and
enhancing
satisfaction wi
th care.
Value Driver 3: Patient and Family
Engagement
____________________________________________________________________________
Certified
Child Life Specialists empower children and families to beco
me informed and
active part
icipants in their healthcare experiences.
By providing
timely, individualized
diagnosis, t
reatment, and discharge education for children and families, Certified Child Life
Specialists
promote health literacy and treatment adheren
ce - reducing unne
cessary emergency
department
visits, preventable hospital readmissions, unscheduled clinic visits, and use of
rescue medicatio
ns in chronically ill populations. When education is provided in play
-based,
trauma-informed,
and culturally res
ponsive ways, pa
tient
-family-provider r
elationships and
communication
are strengthened, familial distress is alleviated, and illness self
-management
is
enhanced.
When healthcar
e providers fail to effectively
communicate wit
h patients and families
about diagnoses, p
rocedures, and
treatment
s, both children and
14 | ACLP
parents/caregivers struggle to cope - often
because of uncertainty and lack of
knowledge; thus, physical and psychological
outcomes are jeopardized. Through ongoing
psychosocial assessment and relationship
building, CCLSs provide educational
interventions that empower children and
families to seek information and become
active participants in their healthcare
experiences.
Communicating with Children
A cornerstone of child life practice, effective
communication with children across all
stages of development is the foundation of
optimal pediatric health outcomes. Children
clearly and consistently report the
importance of receiving honest, accurate
information in healthcare settings,
165-167
and
while physicians also identify honesty as a
priority in healthcare communication,
167
the
medical terminology in which they are
trained is difficult for children and youth to
interpret.
165,168
Ineffective communication
fuels children’s misconceptions and fears
about their illness and treatment.
Conversely, children indicate that receiving
intelligible information about their body,
condition, and care is important in
ameliorating their fears.
165,169
When communication is categorized as
effective, rather than avoidant or ineffective,
children exhibit significantly less distress
(i.e., withdrawal, anxiety, depression) and
fewer social problems.
166
Thus, a pivotal
apex in pediatric healthcare improvement is
individually tailored, developmentally
appropriate communication with children,
and CCLSs advocate for, educate about,
and deliver this intentional communication
with patients of all ages and backgrounds.
Blending cognitive, psychosocial,
information-processing, and sociocultural
perspectives, CCLSs anticipate and assess
for the nuanced understandings that shape
children’s communicative capacities, such
as the development of symbolic thought, the
initiation and resolution of fantastical
thinking, the importance of concrete
exploration and explanations, and the point
at which concerns about the future start to
inform present decision making.
Furthermore, CCLSs are trained in
attending to contextual factors that influence
children’s thoughts and words (even those
that are left unsaid), including cultural
beliefs, family structures, perceived power
dynamics between patients and providers,
and elements of the physical environment
often unnoticed by adults and providers
(e.g., counter heights, seating
arrangements, color schemes, and
accessibility of age appropriate play
materials). Merging their six domains of
practice, CCLSs display and implement a
precisely calibrated skill set for approaching,
involving, and aiding children, youth, and
their families in understanding their care.
Certified Child Life Specialists recognize
that the timing of effective healthcare
communication is an important component
for facilitating patient autonomy in care and
decision-making.
165
As seen with adults,
earlier and more frequent communication is
best. Thus, when communication with
children is conducted using age-appropriate
methods of care planning, patients from
early childhood to emerging adulthood can
better understand illness concepts and
more actively participate in medical
decision-making.
170
By improving
comprehension of their healthcare needs
and eliciting effective communication of their
wishes, age-appropriate and accessible
styles of communication in healthcare
settings facilitate further engagement of
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 15
pediatric patients in their care.
171
Care and
communication that is patient-centered and
collaborative coincides with greater
perceptions of control and competence
amongst patients and parents/caregivers,
resulting in higher self-efficacy and
adherence, especially among older pediatric
patients.
172
Although the need for effective
communication in healthcare settings is
clear, nurses and physicians indicate
considerable barriers when interacting with
children. Nurses identify lengthy, more
involved communication about important
healthcare information as difficult to
prioritize in their busy clinical days, and
physicians note their lack of knowledge
regarding communication with children as a
primary impediment to effective interactions
with pediatric patients.
173
However,
developmentally appropriate communication
facilitated by CCLSs mitigate many of these
barriers noted by nurses and physicians.
Considering that healthcare subject matter
tends to be complex and emotionally
charged, CCLSs apply their education and
training to deliver and reinforce information
that facilitates patient involvement in ways
tailored to their individual needs.
Furthermore, when the subject matter
seems less life-altering, the importance of
therapeutic relationship building - a core
component of child life care - has a salutary
effect on patient and family satisfaction
during treatment.
174-176
The time constraints
often noted by other healthcare
professionals are less applicable to CCLSs
because their profession is largely
dependent upon communication for
education, coping skills training, and
advocacy.
Diagnosis Education
As many as one in four children in the
United States are living with chronic health
conditions - with incidence estimates rapidly
rising - suggesting an important and
expanding need for developmentally
appropriate diagnosis education that begins
early in the illness trajectory.
177
The term
“diagnosis education” describes a multitude
of play-based and developmentally
grounded interventions designed to
increase patient-and-family knowledge and
skills related to medical conditions and their
management.
178,179
Certified Child Life
Specialists employ their distinctive
communication abilities to provide diagnosis
education for patients and families, further
encouraging parental involvement and
continuing to support families with honest
information-sharing.
Diagnosis education is most effective when
it is developmentally appropriate and
incorporates both problem solving and
coping skills training.
180-182
Certified Child
Life Specialists have the distinctive and
dedicated knowledge, focus, resources, and
clinical time to build therapeutic
relationships with children and families,
ensuring that education is individually
tailored, developmentally appropriate, and
coping-focused. In collaboration with
members of multidisciplinary healthcare
teams, CCLSs provide diagnosis education
that improves patient and family experience
in diverse situations, such as inpatient
admissions for ketogenic diet initiation,
perinatally acquired HIV disclosure, burn
rehabilitation, autism support, and
transitional care programs in late
adolescence.
44,45,132,183-187
Research shows that parents/caregivers
struggle with a lack of knowledge and
certainty when communicating medical
16 | ACLP
information to their children, and poor illness
knowledge contributes to increased
psychosocial distress and diminished health
outcomes for children and families.
169,188
In
fact, clinical and best-practice guidelines
reinforce the importance of combining
pediatric diagnosis education with
psychosocial support. For example, it is
difficult to provide effective diagnosis
education for a patient and family
experiencing healthcare-related emotional
distress
189-191
; thus, combining interventions
that address coping with those targeting
knowledge acquisition creates a space in
which patients and families feel emotionally
and psychologically safe - a space more
conducive to learning and sharing.
Additionally, certain psychosocial risk
factors (e.g., low socioeconomic status,
history of migration experiences, previous
trauma exposures, or childhood mental
illness) are associated with even lower
condition knowledge and higher uncertainty
for child and parent.
192
Certified Child Life
Specialists are adept at communicating with
children in developmentally appropriate
ways to remedy medical misconceptions,
especially through ongoing diagnosis
education. They are aptly positioned within
the multidisciplinary care team to not only
address these issues as they arise but to
also ensure that the mode through which
issues are addressed promotes comfort and
reiterates trust.
By providing diagnosis education, CCLSs
extend benefits to children, families, and
hospitals alike, increasing patient and family
knowledge while also impacting their
behavior in ways that optimize the bottom
line. Children who receive individualized
asthma education, for instance, show
reductions in subsequent emergency
department visits, hospital readmissions,
unscheduled clinic visits, and use of oral
corticosteroids, illustrating a link between
diagnosis education and healthcare
resource utilization.
193-195
Educational
interventions, such as those used by
CCLSs, are associated with long-term
improvements in patient and
parent/caregiver knowledge, psychosocial
well-being, quality of life, and physical
health.
178,195,196
Furthermore,
parents/caregivers who report receiving
more and/or higher quality asthma
education indicate better parent-provider
relationships, highlighting the connection
between quality diagnosis education and
improved patient and family experience.
197
___________________________________
In collaboration with members of
multidisciplinary healthcare teams,
CCLSs provide diagnosis education
that improves patient and family
experience in diverse situations,
such as inpatient admissions for
ketogenic diet initiation, perinatally
acquired HIV disclosure, burn
rehabilitation, autism support, and
transitional care programs in late
adolescence.
44,45,132,183-
187
___________________________________
Adherence-Promoting Interventions
The specialized knowledge and skills that
CCLSs apply in diagnosis education and
coping support closely mirror those they use
to promote treatment adherence in pediatric
patients and their families. Treatment non-
adherence is an increasingly burdensome
exp
ense in healthcare - whether measured
by dollars, population health outcomes, or
resource availability. Across both acute and
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 17
chronic condition
s, non
-adherence to
treatment
plans is seldom without
consequences. Fo
r children with acute
conditions,
poor adherence to antibiotic
medications has been ide
ntified as a barrier
to individual
and public health goals (e.g.,
preventing recurren
t infection, reducing the
growth of ant
ibiotic resistant bacteria)
198
; in
those with chroni
c conditions, substandard
treatment
adherence is correlated with
growing healt
hcare usage and costs.
199
Furthermo
re, non
-adherence can lea
d to
higher risks
of morbidity and mortality, such
as organ rej
ection after transplantation
200
and relapse or
recurrence in those with
cancer.
201
Regardless of t
he diagnosis, and
much like what is
seen in discharge
education r
esearch, combination
interventions
that address multiple
components of ps
ychosocial well
-being
prove most im
pactful,
198,202
aligning w
ith the
multidimen
sional approach and skill set of
CCLSs.
While barriers
to treatm
ent adherence
(e.g.,
difficulty
or inability to swallow pills,
diagnosis and t
reatment intensity, lack of
treatment
knowledge) are many and varied
(and not to be
ignored), they are frequently
overcome through
targeted interventions
within the
scope of chil
d life practi
ce. Such
interventions
have rendered statistically
significant
adherence improvements, while
at the same
time promoting other key health
outcomes, such
as decreased viral load and
improved CD4+ T-cell counts
in children
with HIV.
203,204
Additional adheren
ce
barriers i
n childhood manifest and multiply
when treatm
ent is administered via
injection, incl
uding pain or fear of pain
associated with
needles, lack of knowledge
and understandi
ng regarding the illness
and/or treat
ment, and the quality of
the
relationships betw
een healthcare
professionals and
patients.
205
Certified
Child
Life Specialist
s provide combinatory
interventions
that address illness
-related
knowledge an
d understanding, treatment
comprehension,
and techniques for coping
with needle-related fear
and distress.
Development
al complexities also impact
adherence to
treatment recommendations,
and in the con
text of child life care, they are
essential pieces
of individualized
assessment for
adherence
-targeting
interventions
. For
example, in chi
ldren and
adolescents livi
ng with epilepsy, commonly
endorsed bar
riers reflect the intricacies of
each developmental
stage, such as disliking
the taste of
liquid medication, difficulty
swallowing
pills, forgetfulness on behalf of
the parent
/
caregiver and/
or patient, overall
medication refusal
, feeling embarrassed
about the
condition and its treatment,
running out
of medicine, and difficulty
accessing a pharm
acy.
206
It can be
seen,
then, that
just as barriers to adherence
change through
out the
child’s devel
opment,
so, too, shoul
d assessment and intervention
techniques for
bolstering adherence
-
directing extra
attention to the
developmental
periods in which health
outcomes are
typically poorer (i.e.,
adolescence).
206
The importance
of
implementing freque
nt and individualized
assessment alon
gside ever
-evolving
intervention
rings true across varied and
complex pediatric con
ditions (e.g., organ
transplant,
HIV).
200,207
Thus, by assessi
ng
and addressing conte
xtualized barriers that
can arise for
pat
ients and f
amilies, the
developmental
knowledge of CCLSs is vital
in supporting
adherence (both for patients
and their caregi
vers) across childhood,
adolescence, an
d emerging adulthood.
18 | ACLP
___________________________________
Certified Child Life Specialists
provide combinatory interventions
that address illness-related
knowledge and understanding,
treatment comprehension, and
techniques for coping with needle-
related fear and distress.
___________________________________
Parent Engagement
As shown above, parental involvement is a
key component of both treatment adherence
and adherence-promoting interventions.
Because effective communication and
active engagement are vital in optimizing
both patient and family outcomes,
parents/caregivers need to be intentionally
incorporated into their children’s care. In
pediatric healthcare, parents’/caregivers’
participation in their children’s healthcare
can range from simply being present at the
bedside to intentional interaction and/or
active engagement in communication and
care processes. Research demonstrates
that there are benefits of allowing
parents/caregivers to be present in medical
settings (e.g., during medical procedures,
anesthesia induction, and resuscitation) and
providing them with individualized education
and support.
169
In addition, care that is truly
family-centered leads to increased
satisfaction overall.
208
More specifically, providing
parents/caregivers with guidance on
supporting their child during treatment,
hospitalization, and procedures has
emerged as an essential means for
managing parent/caregiver - and patient -
distress across pediatric healthcare
settings. During their child’s inpatient
hospitalization, parents/caregivers report
significant challenges to their own coping,
such as unfamiliarity with the hospital
environment, ambiguity regarding their role
in the child’s care, a lack of information
about and understanding of procedures,
and uncertainty about the diagnosis and
treatment plan.
140,209-212
Furthermore,
parents/caregivers also experience
healthcare related distress when a child is
hospitalized and/or has a chronic illness
involving repeat healthcare experiences. As
this anxiety rises, so, too, do negative
behavioral and health-related outcomes
such as psychological symptomatology,
disease severity, and healthcare utilization
rates for children and adolescents.
213
In
day-to-day life, general parenting stress in
those with children diagnosed with a chronic
illness is significantly higher than that of
parents/caregivers of healthy children
213
- a
finding to be expected given the increased
levels of daily care and perceived isolation
for parents/caregivers of chronically ill
children. As multidisciplinary team members
attuned to the dynamic, bidirectional effects
of parent/caregiver and child distress,
CCLSs provide interventions to promote
and support adaptive parental coping with
children’s present and prospective medical
experiences.
An expected component of pediatric
healthcare, parenting stress (like patient
stress), is a modifiable condition.
213
A
parent’s appraisal, positive or negative, of
an event or situation can largely determine
the psychosocial outcomes of a child’s
healthcare experience. Negative appraisals
can dilute coping efforts and increase
disease-related stress in parents/
caregivers.
213
When parents/caregivers are
given the opportunity to access information
about their child’s treatment and receive
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 19
guidance on ways to best support their
children in the process, parental anxiety is
lessened.
105,169,214
In addition, more
knowledge about and frequent use of
effective coping strategies not only
decreases parent distress but also
heightens parent satisfaction with
healthcare experiences.
215
Additionally,
when parents/caregivers are actively
involved in their child’s care (i.e., included in
decision making and empowered to address
developmental milestones utilizing play and
other skills), they experience less distress,
their children cope more effectively, and
their confidence as parents grows.
105,214,216
Ensuring this active parent/caregiver
engagement in healthcare experiences is a
central tenet of child life care. Interventions
(e.g., preparation, procedural support,
coping skills and diagnosis education) that
reduce negative experiences, increase
understanding and parental engagement
and can reduce distress in parents and their
children alike during future medical
encounters.
162,217-219
For example,
parents/caregivers who are engaged in IV
placements through comfort positioning
report greater satisfaction with catheter
insertion, their level of participation in the
procedure, their ability to provide emotional
support to their child, and the staff’s skill in
managing the child’s pain.
162
In addition,
engaging and involving parents/caregivers
in their children’s care can significantly
lower parent and child distress during
procedures like IV placements without
significantly altering the number of attempts
made or the total time spent on the
procedure, which maximizes both quality of
care and throughput.
148,162,217,218
Often perceived as falling primarily on the
parent/caregiver, responsibility for illness
management in pediatrics is typically shared
between the
child or adolescent, the
parents/caregi
vers, and the healthcare
team. Just
as higher parent/caregiver stress
can intensify ne
gative health outcomes, so,
too, can un
balanced responsibility. Unrest in
health manage
ment responsibilities
between any of
these partners can further
amplify paren
tal distress.
213
Therefore,
cyclical patt
erns of parent, patient, and
family distress are propagat
ed. Through
encouraging
a teamwork approach to
disease managem
ent, CCLSs can: 1)
ascertain a chi
ld’s capacity to begin taking
responsibili
ty for disease management, 2)
work with nursin
g colleagues to assess the
educational
and developmental
needs of t
he
pediatric pat
ient, and 3) coach
parents/caregi
vers in meeting these needs
-
all of which le
ad to an increasingly well
-
balanced approach
to condition
management an
d lowered parent
stress.
175,208,2
13,220,221
Involvement by chil
d
life professionals aids in preventing
parents/caregi
vers and/or pediatric patients
from assumin
g unsustainable
responsibili
ties for care, and research
demonstrates
that both parents/caregivers
and healthcare
staff find parental support to
be more impa
ctful
- and children to be more
cooperative wi
th care
- when a CCLS
is
involved.
148,175
,219
Their fine-tuned skill
set
and family-centered t
raining enable CCLSs
to meet t
he needs of parents/caregivers as
they care f
or their ill or hospitalized child,
increasing paren
t satisfa
ction, decr
easing
parent str
ess, and creating a more informed
and engaged generation
of healthcare
consumers.
Discharge Educa
tion and Health Literacy
A prime area f
or improvement in patient
-
and-family-centered he
althcare
experiences, par
ticularly for inpat
ient
hospitalizations,
is supporting families
20 | ACLP
through hospital-to-home transitions. During
these times of change, much like times of
duress, accurate information and
individualized support are crucial to patient
and family coping and success. In this
sense, the practices and concepts of
discharge education and health literacy are
steadily emerging areas of opportunity, both
for improving patient experience and
population health.
Transitional success in healthcare contexts
is largely a function of health literacy, which
has been defined as, “the degree to which
[patients and/or parents/caregivers] have
the capacity to obtain, process, and
understand basic health information and
services needed to make appropriate health
decisions.”
222
However, according to the
U.S. Department of Education,
223
as many
as 40 million American adults - 1 in 5 - are
considered to have “low English literacy
skills,” or as having below basic functional
reading skills. This means that for this
subset of parents/caregivers, when tasked
with the elevated challenges of reading and
comprehending complex healthcare
information, upwards of 20% of
parents/caregivers are unsuccessful in
achieving the necessary level of health
literacy to serve as proficient partners in
their child’s care. Taking into account the
profound importance of the parent/caregiver
role in effective hospital-to-home transitions
and health outcomes in childhood, providers
must assess and account for health literacy
when formulating and implementing
effective discharge education in healthcare
settings.
Systematic empirical evidence consistently
demonstrates that lower literacy skills in
children lead to poorer personal health
behaviors, and lower parent/caregiver
literacy skills lead to worse child health
outcomes.
224
While much of pediatric health
literacy research focuses on
parents/caregivers, findings demonstrate
these outcomes are also likely to hold true
for children.
225,226
For example, healthcare
literature that is specifically targeted
towards and designed for pediatric patients
has been shown to result in children more
accurately identifying and answering
questions about their health status.
227
This
marks a significant achievement because
children often understand their
hospitalization through their own interpretive
l
ens – a direct result of their developmental
level, personal knowledge, and
experiences.
228
Certified Child Life
Specialists, by blending their strategies for
effective communication with their robust
developmental knowledge, possess distinct
training allowing them to identify the ways in
which children’s conceptual schemas about
health and illness are developed, revised,
and expanded, especially as children
negotiate the barrage of new information
presented by healthcare encounters. Thus,
CCLSs identify, explain, correct, and
replace these misconceptions through
developmentally appropriate play,
education, and communication,
7,229
strengthening children’s health literacy as it
unfolds.
Across intervention types and modes of
administration, health literacy must be
assessed and adjusted for, ultimately
adjoining into multidisciplinary care
approaches to promote successful
transitions to and from care. Discharge
education and standardized discharge
processes have been identified by both
parents/caregivers and healthcare providers
as indispensable components of pediatric
hospital care
230-233
; furthermore,
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 21
parents
/caregivers and providers
demonstr
ate marked agreement regarding
education
al content and strategies for
effective con
tent delivery.
230,23
1,233,234
-236
Namely, bo
th stakeholder groups prioritize
discharge
education that is: 1) high
-
quality,
231,23
3,235
2) deliver
ed in standardized
ways,
230,23
1,234
and 3) app
ropriately
timed.
233,23
6
Relevant l
iterature illuminates vital
consideratio
ns for the delivery of di
scharge
education
, particularly as patients and
families sta
rt their transitions from hospital
to home.
When discharge education is
poorly planned o
r lacking, patients and
families are
more likely to experience
subsequent r
eadmissions.
235,23
7
It has
been
shown that
when discharge education is
provided all
at once, shortly before
discharge
and/or on the date of discharge,
parents
/caregivers report feeling both
overwhel
med and unprepared,
233,23
6
compromisi
ng their ability to comprehend
crucial de
tails about t
heir chi
ld’s care. High
quality
discharge education, on the other
hand (as
perceived by the parent/caregiver),
results
in a more positive assessment of
their
discharge readiness by nursing staff,
235
and when di
scharge education is
considered
comprehensive,
reductions
in
readmission
rates, particularly in children
hospitali
zed for asthma
-related il
lness, can
result.
238
Additi
onally, when in
-home ca
re
activities are
required after discharge,
simulated t
eaching with parents/caregivers
that ap
propriately addres
ses their
knowledge
and comfort levels bolsters their
self-efficacy
239
- which allays pr
ovider costs
and resour
ces by avoiding preventable
readmissions
or care encounters.
240,24
1
Beyond t
he institutional benefits rendered
by effective di
scharge education, research
reveals a
host of positive outcomes for
individu
al parent/caregivers and patients
(e.g.,
increased illness
-related know
ledge,
decreased
anxiety, improved coping).
242
In
addition
, these benefits are magnified when
discharge
education is appropriately
structured
, culturally appropriate, and
individu
alized for the patient and
family.
233,24
2
Teach-back (a par
ticular
provider-driven
and patient
-reciprocated
education
al strateg
y), for
example, has
proven to be hi
ghly effective in discharge
education
.
243,24
4
However,
like many
education
al interventions, its use is
frequen
tly hindered by lack of provider
time
235,24
5
and staffi
ng.
246
Physicians
likewise id
entify time constraints an
d a lack
of empir
ically supported communication
tools (
e.g., teach
-back) a
s barriers to
promoting
patient and family
comprehension
of discharge information.
247
As effective
communicators, relationship
builder
s, and educators for patients and
families,
7,229,232
CCLSs con
sider, facilitate,
and develop he
alth literacy in children and
families as an
integral part of their dedicated
clinical
time and responsibilities. Their ability
to conduct
individualized assessments
enables chil
d life professionals to design
and implement
structured, educational plans
of care t
hat cater to the unique needs and
experiences o
f each patient and family while
simultan
eously meeting unit
-based and
facilit
y
-wide di
scharge goals. Certified Child
Life Special
ists possess the distinct,
necessary
multidimensional skills for
ensuring that
discharge education and
hospital-to-home t
ransitions are
opportun
ities carefully constructed and
intentional
ly poised to enhance the health
literacy o
f children, youth, and families.
22 | ACLP
Value Driver 4: Developmental Impacts
____________________________________________________________________________
Certified Child Life Specialists promote and sustain optimal developmental and
psychosocial growth from infancy through emerging adulthood. They facilitate purposeful
play experiences, normative interactions, and transition support for patients, parents/caregivers,
and family members that shape positive coping and development. Targeted, developmentally
appropriate, and family-centered play-based and educational interventions result in increased
weight gain, abated feeding difficulties, and decreased length of stay in infancy, thus enhancing
neurodevelopmental outcomes. In children, adolescents, and emerging adults, these supports
render improved emotion regulation, effective coping behaviors, adaptive peer interactions, and
more appropriate use of healthcare resources.
Chronic illness and prolonged
hospitalization in childhood pose a multitude
of threats to child and family
development.
216
Left unaddressed, these
experiences can damage children’s physical
and psychological health, and quickly
activate traumatic stress responses.
248
By
providing family-centered, play-based, and
developmentally supportive care, CCLSs
help children and their families access the
tools within themselves and one another
needed to successfully navigate
developmental barriers and transitional
experiences.
Developmental Assessment and
Intervention
Developmentally supportive care is defined
as a comprehensive, collaborative, and
patient-and-family-centered approach to
improving developmental outcomes through
individualized interventions.
249,251
Similarly,
positive patient experiences and outcomes
multiply when the focus is on both the
physical well-being of children and their
developmental and psychosocial needs.
252
Certified Child Life Specialists partner with
patients and families of all abilities and
diagnoses to identify developmental
barriers, needs, and goals during medical
experiences. Depending on the child’s age
(chronological and developmental) and
experiences, these can involve ensuring
parent/caregiver presence during
procedures (especially for infants),
maximizing opportunities for choice and
control for toddlers, correcting
misconceptions of care in preschoolers,
supporting connections to activities and
contexts of daily life (e.g., school,
community, extracurricular activities, and
peer interactions) for older children and
adolescents, and adapting the hospital
environment and care approach to support
the needs of children with complex
healthcare needs, such as autism spectrum
disorder.
253-255
Children understand their medical
experiences, as well as the impacts of these
experiences, based on their cognitive,
social, and emotional development, and an
important component of child life practice is
anticipating potential challenges that can
arise as a result of these perceptions.
Certified Child Life Specialists are
specifically trained to identify children's
interpretations of and reactions to stressful
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 23
events, part
icularly in the context of
healthcare en
vironments.
252
Depending
on
the child’
s developmental level and
temperament,
factors such as decreased
mobilit
y,
social and physi
cal isolation, use of
life-sustaining med
ical equipment, and
treatmen
t or illness side effects altering
baseline be
havior can provoke
development
al difficulties or delays.
216
Addition
ally, inconsistent parent/caregiver
presence, painful
and
invasive procedu
res,
interrupti
ons of daily routines and
schedules, lack
of opportunities for
exploratory pl
ay, and altered parent
-child
roles and respon
sibilities can jeopardize the
child-parent r
elationship. Furthermore,
disruption
s to parent/caregiver
participa
tion
in the chil
d’s care can jeopardize infant
-
parent at
tachment and further complicate
the child’
s ability to achieve normative
development
al milestones.
216,248
,249,252
Thus,
CCLSs provide
targeted play
-based,
educational
, and therapeutic soluti
ons to
address medical
misconceptions,
ameliorate t
he consequences of these
misconcepti
ons, and reinforce honest,
accurate, an
d developmentally appropriate
informati
on.
___________________________________
By continually assessing the
individual patient, family,
environment, and situation, CCLS
s
intervene based not only on
the
child’s developmental needs and
capabilities but also on the influe
nce
of their temperament, previous
medical experiences,
misconceptions, fears, and
responses to stressful events.
257,25
8
___________________________________
As noted
by the National Association for the
Welfare of
Children in Hospitals,
256
children
need and pr
efer developmentally supportive
care, age approp
riate information about
their di
agnosis and treatment, and
opportunities
to participate in their
healthcare e
xperiences. Without these
elements, i
t is nearly impossible to provide
truly chil
d
-focused med
ical and
psychosocial care
.
248
Therefore,
in order to
meet the
unique developmental needs of
children in the
hospit
al (i.e.,
creating and
maintaining
healthy routines, providing
opportuni
ties for play and socialization, and
supporting
children during procedures),
ongoing en
vironmental assessment is
essential, as
a child’s relationship with their
environmen
t is a salien
t source of
exploration,
learning, and development for
children of al
l abilities and conditions.
251
To facili
tate comfort and increase
understandi
ng, CCLSs consider the
environmen
t and its impact on care
interactions w
hen providing ongoing,
individual
ized
support f
or pediatric patients
and their
families
. By co
ntinually assessing
the indi
vidual patient, family, environment,
and situation,
CCLSs intervene based not
only on t
he child’s developmental needs
and capabilit
ies but also on the influence of
their temperament
, previous medical
experiences, m
isconceptions, fears, and
responses t
o stressful events.
257,258
Specifical
ly in infancy, developmentally
supportive
care (e.g., kangaroo care,
purposeful po
sitioning, infant massage, and
age appropriate pa
in manag
ement) resul
ts
in reduced leng
th of stay, earlier transitions
to oral f
eedings, increased weight gain, and
better
neurodevelopmental outcomes for
premature i
nfants.
251
On the
other hand,
environmen
tal stimuli such as harsh lighting
and excessive ambien
t no
ise, inadequ
ate or
24 | ACLP
excessive handling and caregiving, and
repeated exposure to painful procedures
can damage the immature infant brain and,
ultimately, alter their developmental
course.
259
Certified Child Life Specialists,
with their knowledge of child development
and awareness of multisensory
environmental and health-related stressors,
are distinctly prepared to anticipate,
prevent, and combat the potentially harmful
impacts of healthcare encounters for
children and families.
Dimensions of Play
Play is one of the foundational tools that
CCLSs draw upon to assess development
and prevent any emotional or psychological
harm posed by healthcare environments.
Across theoretical perspectives, play is
consistently described as any activity in
which participants are voluntarily engaged,
that is free from the structure and bounds of
reality, and inherently enjoyable.
43,114,122
Play is a therapeutic tool, a conduit for
healing and healthy processing of events
and information, and an essential
intervention in pediatric healthcare
settings.
43,114,115,121,260
Hospitalized children,
in contrast with those in the comforts of
home and family, demonstrate a greater
need to play because of the stress
generated by unfamiliar environments,
unpredictable schedules, painful
experiences, and mobility restrictions due to
illness or treatment.
116,261
When play is
unstructured, child-directed,
developmentally appropriate, contextually
relevant, and easily accessible, play is
replete with therapeutic value and vital for
whole child development. In the safe, low-
stakes atmosphere of play, infants, children,
and youth explore possibilities, rehearse
responses, and process thoughts or
emotions in manners unavailable in other
real-life contexts.
43,120,262
Hospitalization is
one such context that disrupts access to
and activities involving play.
116,117,263
In fact,
consistent and prolonged absence of play in
a child’s environment leads to missed
opportunities for learning, understanding,
and development.
Particularly in hospital settings, children and
adolescents spend less time playing and
use more narrow and repetitive themes,
engaging in less group play with peers than
those in their homes, neighborhoods, and
other community settings.
116
Such changes
in play behaviors stem from anxiety and the
lack of perceived safety and predictability in
the hospital environment.
116
Stress,
therefore, intensely colors children’s
perceptions of medical events,
116,264
and as
a result, hospitalized children are prone to
many months of emotional distress following
discharge.
263
Certified Child Life Specialists
remain cognizant of the detrimental
consequences arising from the absence of
play, thus, intentionally weaving it into most
components of their practice (e.g.,
facilitating self-expression, and providing
preparation, procedural support, diagnosis
teaching and discharge education).
___________________________________
Play is one of the foundational tools
that CCLSs draw upon to assess
development and prevent any
emotional or psychological harm
posed by healthcare environments.
___________________________________
An important piece of facilitating and
protecting play in stressful healthcare
experiences is preparing and preserving
play-conducive spaces
122,260,262,265
- a facet
of care that CCLSs are attuned to across
healthcare situations. The pediatric
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 25
healthcare en
vironment should be designed
to create
as many playful circumstances as
possible, increasi
ng the time and space for
children and adolesce
nts to process and
master the
ir experiences.
7,116,260,2
62,266,267
Certified
Child Life Specialists intentionally
create an
d adapt hospital environments to
promote play
opportunities, improve coping
behaviors and
maximize quality of life in
hospitalized
children and their
families,
51,116,2
64
and when a safe and
supportive
environment is achieved, play
aids in increased
cooperation and
adherence t
o treatment regime.
114
Often r
eferred to as “pretend play” or
“therapeu
tic unstructured play” in research
literature,
free play prevents or reduces
child anxiety and distr
ess especially when
offered i
n the restrictive bounds of
healthcare en
vironments.
121,143
Addition
ally,
the prese
nce of a knowledgeable,
supportive
adult play partner is necessary in
assisting an
d guiding children in making
sense of thei
r hospital
experiences
through
play.
116
Responsive, em
pathetic, and well
-
trained adult
s such as CCLSs assess
individual
coping needs of children and
adolescents through
observation that is
supported
by strong, applied knowledge of
child and fami
ly development.
51,114,119,12
0
And, whe
n they supervise, but do not
necessarily
structure or lead, CCLSs
purposefully
modify play interventions to
reinforce ad
aptive coping behaviors (e.g.,
effective em
otion regulation, appropriate
coping str
ategy usage, and positive peer
interactions) and
abate negative
behaviors.
121,143
Furtherm
ore, parental
presence in a chi
ld’s play environment
directly predi
cts self
-expression an
d positive
coping.
122,26
1
Along with t
he presence of supportive
caregivers and ski
lled staff such as CCLSs,
the active rol
e of the child in play is
imperative
to building effective coping
strategi
es for managing acute and chronic
(or repeat
ed) healthcare experiences. As
previously est
ablished, in order for positive
coping beha
viors to develop, children need
the ability to f
ree play by selecting their own
play material
s and themes within an
intentionall
y
-designed,
effectively
-
supervised environm
ent.
115,116
,268,269
Pretend
play in such en
vironments cultivates
divergent though
t processes and emotion
regulation, w
hich ar
e elements
of problem
solving essentia
l for coping with stress.
121,270
Certified
Child Life Specialists recognize the
ability
of pediatric patients to choose, when
appropriate,
and advocate for opportunities
for the
child to exercise control. Thus, when
play is child-directed, chi
ldren often
perceive the
mselves as in control, gaining
enhanced mast
ery over their experiences
and improved sel
f
-efficacy r
egarding current
and future
hospitalizations.
117,271
,272
It is
through this
perceived control, and
increased self-efficacy i
n stressful situations
that young
patients are taught to be active
participa
nts in and lifelong consumers of
healthcare.
271
A distinct
form of play unique to child life
practice is
medical play, which gives
children access
to play with med
ical them
es
and/or medi
cal equipment offered in a
monitored,
and non
-threatening
manner.
This type
of play is further characterized by
three other
essential features: 1) it can be
adult ini
tiated but must be child
-directed and
maintained 2)
it is enjoyable
in nature, of
ten
accompanied
by laughter and relaxation,
and 3) it
offers mastery and control over
frighten
ing medical environments.
272
An
importan
t component of children’s coping in
26 | ACLP
healthcare settings is this intentional play
with medical equipment (e.g., masks,
gloves, syringes, stethoscopes, and even
needles), and the combination of
recognizable play methods and unfamiliar
medical equipment allows children to
integrate their thoughts and feelings and
achieve a healthy sense of mastery over a
situation.
273,274
For example, research
indicates that children that play with items
related to their stressors (such as those
involved in an IV placement) experience
reduced anxiety and greater ability to
cope.
114
By gradually introducing unfamiliar
medical equipment through play, children
attain greater control over their environment
and begin expressing their feelings and
perceptions, as play is their language and
toys are their words.
266
Because of their extensive education and
training in medical play, CCLSs are model
healthcare professionals for facilitating it for
confused, anxious, and/or stressed pediatric
patients and families. They possess the
developmental knowledge necessary for
ensuring that the medical equipment
involved in play interventions is appropriate
for the social, emotional, and cognitive
abilities of the patient, and they have
clinically completed individualized
assessments to ensure said equipment
meets these developmental requirements.
Certified Child Life Specialists utilize free
play as another form of assessment,
effectively observing children’s behavioral
cues while also screening for accurate
understanding (or misconception) that
indicates need for follow up care.
46,52,131,264
Specifically, medical play can yield insight
into developmental needs, psychological
conflicts, and unexpressed fears
43,51, 52,275
and more directed (or adult- or CCLS-led)
medical play techniques can be used to
prepare children for surgery or other
unpleasant medical procedures, resulting in
decreased anxiety.
61,274
Apart from
alleviating psychological distress, medical
play with the goal of preparation also carries
physiological benefits for the child, such as
decreased cortisol levels and heart rate
both before and during medical
procedures.
115,143
Within the context of well-defined,
therapeutic relationships, CCLSs provide
safe, secure spaces for children and youth
to express feelings that, outside of low-
stakes play contexts, could be construed as
inappropriate and go
unacknowledged.
114,262,264,269
Certified Child
Life Specialists provide opportunities, as
well as physical and temporal space, for
pediatric patients to gain a sense of control
and mastery over healthcare
experiences.
114,116,262,264,269,270
In fact, many
hospitals rely upon CCLS and additional
child life staffing (e.g., child life assistants,
special events coordinators, or volunteer
supervisors) to enhance patient experiences
and normalize the environment through
coordinated hospital events and/or play-
based programming. A visit from a facility
dog, a musical activity in the recording
studio, or a movie night in the hospital
theater are just a few examples of events
that provide therapeutic benefits for patients
and families (e.g., socialization, self-
expression, diversion, a sense of normalcy)
during stressful times while also engaging
the support of community partners and
donors.
4
4,276-278
As the multidisciplinary team members most
knowledgeable about the powerful effects of
play, CCLSs often demonstrate and teach
coping strategies through play to decrease
stress in healthcare settings and impact
development in the midst of and following
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 27
healthcare en
counters.
119,143
,270
They also
provide ther
apeutic play opportunities that
reduce st
ress before procedures,
ameliorating
negative behaviors and
physiological responses.
143,263
Certified
Child Life Spe
cialists facilitate consistent,
recurring
opportunities for free,
unstructured
, and truly therapeutic play so
as to bolst
er positive, long
-term ef
fects on
pain, adju
stment to illness, and externalizing
behaviors. Notably,
and as expected, the
presence of a
CCLS has been shown to
proliferate
children’s effective and healthy
interactions w
ith play materials in healthcare
settings.
121
Certified
Child Life Specialists
are the pr
ofessionals within multidisciplinary
healthcare
teams specifically trained in the
therapeut
ic value and expansive utility of
play, child develop
ment, and the ideal ways
to apply this
knowledge to identify and
ameliorate st
ress in healthcare settings.
School R
eentry
Medical exp
eriences continu
e to affec
t
children far
past the point of procedure
completion or di
scharge. When a diagnosis,
treatmen
t, or hospitalization separates them
from t
heir typical social circles for extended
periods of
time, returning to contexts like
home, school
, and peer g
roups can be
an
additional
source of stress. Research
demonstrate
s that children who are ill or
hospitalized
report disruptions to their daily
activities and soci
al roles as their most
significan
t health
-related str
essors (e.g.,
missing scho
ol days or fall
ing behind
in
school work,
not doing things they used to
do, feel
ing isolated from their peers).
279,280
Furtherm
ore, work has verified that
prolonged absences
threaten the child’s
peer relationsh
ips and sense of well
-being.
Children often
feel estranged fr
om their
friends,
as school attendance
dwindles
279,28
1,282
and side-effects fr
om
treatmen
t (e.g., fatigue, nausea, and pain)
not only
prolong separation from school, but
also pose long-term cogni
tive
challenges,
283,28
4
and attenti
on
difficult
ies,
285,286
all of which can
have
detrimen
tal and lasting impacts on a child’s
sense of self
and social relationships.
Moreover, ap
proximately 45% of students
with chroni
c health conditions fall behind in
their s
chool work, which, in turn, leads them
to dislike school.
286
An increased
aversion
towards school
and fear of isolation from
classmates can
make returning to school
after a
healthcare encounter that much
more diff
icult. However, play
-based and
educational
school
-reentry p
rograms,
provided by CC
LSs, help ease this
transiti
on for patients, classmates, and
school staf
f. Certified Child Life Specialists
recognize t
he challenges school reentry can
present, assessing
and anticipating the
patient-and-family’
s transitional needs and
providing ind
ividualized, evidence
-based
intervention
s (e.g., coping skills education,
therapeut
ic play, diagnosis and treatment
education)
.
School ree
ntry programs extend hospital
-
based child li
fe support into the community
through tar
geted education for the child,
their pe
ers, and school pers
onnel (e
.g.,
teachers,
school counselors and nurses,
classroom aids).
A considerable way in
which CCLSs brid
ge the gap between the
typical devel
opmental context of the
classroom and t
he drastically different
hospital set
ting is by increasing school
personnel’s knowl
edge and comfort with the
child’s condi
tion, and the many ways in
which the s
chool can support the child’s
reentry.
These programs facilitate support
by coordinating
care between the child’s
family, heal
thcare team, and educational
staff, an
d are
individual
ized to reflect the
28 | ACLP
child’s cognitive, physical, and
socioemotional needs both prior to and
since treatment.
287-290
Considering their robust knowledge of child
development and family systems, CCLSs
are distinctly suited to facilitate school
reentry services, liaising between the
patient’s family, multidisciplinary healthcare
team, and school personnel.
291
Certified
Child Life Specialists, through age
appropriate education and play, model ways
to relate to, care for, and engage with the
child to promote connection and reduce
social isolation. They tailor information to
the developmental needs specific to the
patient and their peers, and they possess
the knowledge and communication skills
necessary to explain pertinent medical
information to teachers and classmates
alike. By articulating the developmental
impacts of the child’s condition to educators
and administrators, CCLSs ensure that the
child receives the appropriate instructional
and ancillary support needed to thrive in the
school setting. Educational workshops
provided by CCLSs are particularly
beneficial to peers and classmates because
the provision of accurate and
developmentally appropriate medical
information demystifies misconceptions they
may have prior to the child’s return; if left
unaddressed, classmate fears and fallacies
can evolve into isolating the ill child, further
exacerbating the loneliness they felt during
hospitalization.
282,292
Certified Child Life
Specialists facilitate these support services
to ensure that patients have the
comprehensive academic and psychosocial
resources needed for a successful hospital-
to-school transition.
Transitional Care
Like school reentry, the progression from
pediatric to adult care introduces another
medical and social transition that can
provoke anxiety for adolescents and
emerging adults (AEAs), and their families.
Transitioning toward adult health systems
proves to be a tenuous juncture in the
developmental and medical trajectories of
AEAs
59
due to their increased vulnerability
to behavioral health risks, emerging or
worsening chronic health conditions, and
diminished healthcare use in this age
group.
293-295
Moreover, age-gradient
patterns of healthcare coverage and access
have been well documented during the AEA
period of development, with rates worsening
as individuals progress through
adolescence and enter into emerging
adulthood
295
- a pattern also evident in
AEAs with special healthcare needs.
296
Poor
planning and/or lack of readiness for
healthcare transition is linked to more
frequent use of emergency rooms and
outpatient clinics, as well as higher
incidence of hospital admissions and
surgical procedures.
297-299
In addition,
transfer to adult care is delayed, medical
appointments are missed, and independent
care management is compromised.
297,298
Taken together, this constellation of effects
can have dire consequences for the delivery
of cost-effective, high-quality healthcare
services and attainment of optimal
population health outcomes.
Developmentally appropriate and
individualized interventions (a core feature
of child life practice) for AEAs improve
transitional healthcare planning and
readiness (e.g., improved patient disease
knowledge and competence, greater patient
self-efficacy, increased patient confidence,
and heightened motivation).
296,300
The
extensive developmental knowledge that
CCLSs routinely employ when working with
patients and families is invaluable in such
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 29
contexts;
these healthcare professionals
ensure that
the interventions and supports
being provi
ded are emotionally, c
ognitivel
y,
and physically
appropriate for each unique
patient
and family system. By tending to the
psychosocial
variables deemed most
import
ant by AEA patients (e.g., unstable
life circumst
ances, competing life demands,
depression,
anxiety, denial of illn
ess, fear
and anxiety as i
t relates to their diagnoses,
changing
social structures, and lack of peer
support/
relation), CCLSs provide the
education
and support this vulnerable
patient
population requires as they
assimilate
into adult healthcare processes
and systems
.
298,30
1
The timi
ng by which the transition from
pediatric
to adult care is introduced and
initiated
is another key facet of optimized
AEA he
alth. When unprepared, AEA
patient
s report feeling forced into taking
responsibi
lity for their health man
agement
too soon
- not rea
dy for the tasks upcoming
or at ha
nd.
298
Transitional
care that begins
earlier
in childhood/adolescence and
evolves alongsi
de the pediatric patient and
their
family increases patient disease
knowledge
and self
-management,
298,30
1
and
by discussing t
his care early in the medical
journeys
of pediatric patients with chronic
condition
s, expectations are set that further
their
confidence, self
-efficacy,
and
independe
nt functioning.
302
Patients who
receive prep
aration for the transition t
o adult
care through st
ructured, purposeful
programming
indicate favorable perceptions
of their
health status, as well as increased
satisfaction
with their providers.
302
Certifi
ed Child Life Specialists, trained in
anticipa
ting and evaluating developmental
changes as t
hey occur, are skilled
therapeu
tic relationship builders; therefore,
they ar
e ideal multidisciplinary team
members f
or incorporating incremental,
purposeful transit
ional education and
training
. Drawing from their expertise in both
family syst
ems and effective
communicat
ion, CCLSs not only recognize
the need
to provide ongoing preparation for
both AEAs
and their parents/caregivers but
are also an i
nvaluable sou
rce of t
his
support.
They understand the particular
import
ance this type of intervention has for
parents
/caregivers because research often
notes str
uggle when tasked with
relinqui
shing control of their adolescent’s
daily i
llness management.
301
Further
more,
in order
to provide all parties with a smooth
transit
ion, CCLSs educate
parents
/caregivers on developmentally
appropriate
strategies to encourage
incremental
ly increased healthcare
responsibi
lity in their AEAs
- strategies
addressing co
mponents such as me
dication
management
, independently engaging with
providers,
and caring for medical equipment
- so as to
facilitate better preparedness and
subsequent care
satisfaction across this
critical
family dyad.
302
Beyond she
er fit of their skillset, CCLSs
demonstrate these
competencies when
designing
and facilitating targeted transition
programs for
AEAs with special healthcare
needs. Fo
r example, when explicitly
employed to imp
rove transition outcomes
for yout
h with chronic conditions, CCLSs
developed
and facilita
ted compr
ehensive
transit
ion programming that was associated
with a t
hree
-year, 40
% increase in AEA
patient
s engaging in treatment, as well as
patient-and-famil
y satisfaction scores
sustained in t
he 90
th
percent
ile.
Further
more, CCLSs added to healthcare
consumership whi
le concurrently facilitating
improved pat
ient experience by intentionally
30 | ACLP
incorporating leadership development, peer
socialization and mentoring, and
developmentally appropriate treatment and
survivorship education.
44
AEAs participating
in such programs demonstrated significant
improvements in illness knowledge and a
100% participation rate in routine follow-ups
after transition programming
engagement.
185
While engagement with transition
programming is essential, it cannot happen
without first assessing for the preparedness
of AEAs and their families for such
intervention. Reports of healthcare transition
readiness in this population are notably
impacted by family cohesion, such that the
more unity the patient and family describe,
the more likely patients are to report being
ready for healthcare transitions.
297
As
healthcare professionals acutely aware of
transitional needs and supports, CCLSs
employ their distinctive developmental
knowledge and training not only to
appropriately begin, but also effectively
maintain and revise purposeful, measured
movement from pediatric to adult health
systems.
Value Driver 5: Healthcare Consumership
____________________________________________________________________________
Certified Child Life Specialists improve population health by fostering long-term patterns
of healthcare consumership that reduce the risk of preventable conditions. By maintaining
and advancing a patient-and-family-centered healthcare environment, Certified Child Life
Specialists mitigate pediatric medical traumatic stress and improve mental health outcomes for
infants, children, youth, and families. They establish the foundation for positive coping and
resilience in the face of medical experiences and attenuate the negative physical and
psychosocial effects of stress, loss, and grief - including stroke, heart attack and high blood
pressure in adulthood - thereby cultivating health-promoting behaviors throughout the lifespan.
A family’s medical experience or
hospitalization has the potential to incur a
host of negative outcomes: pediatric
medical traumatic stress (PMTS), insecure
attachment, psychological maladjustment,
complicated bereavement, escalated risk of
psychopathology, and greater incidence of
life-threatening health conditions throughout
the lifespan. By providing procedural
preparation and support, opportunities for
parental education and involvement, and
therapeutic play interventions, CCLSs equip
patients and families with irreplaceable
adaptive coping strategies - thereby
cultivating resilience and mitigating
iatrogenic effects of healthcare related
stress.
Pediatric Medical Traumatic Stress
Pediatric medical traumatic stress (PMTS)
encompasses a set of psychological and
physiological responses of children to
potentially traumatic events such as pain,
injury, serious illness, medical procedures,
and invasive or frightening treatment
experiences.
303
More than a singular
diagnostic entity, PMTS is a broader
conceptual framework for understanding the
spectrum of possible negative responses to
medical experiences that children may
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 31
exhibit.
49
Overall
rates of clinical PMTS are
roughly 30
% for children, youth, and
parents/
caregivers.
48
Symptoms
of PMTS
can include - but are no
t limited to
-
manifest
ations of posttraumatic stress
disorder (PTSD
) such as arousal, avoidance
of trauma
reminders, dissociation, negative
changes in moo
d or cognition, re
-
experiencing t
raumatic events, and intrusive
thoughts.
47,48
In fact,
even three to five
months after an
inpatient hospitalization,
more than
55% of children demonstrated
significan
t symptoms of re
-experiencing
trauma,
30.4% exhibited symptoms of
avoidance,
and 32.9% displayed significant
symptoms of
hyperarousal.
304
___________________________________
By providing procedural preparatio
n
and support, opportunities for
parental education and involveme
nt,
and therapeutic play interventions,
CCLSs equip patients and families
with irreplaceable adaptive c
oping
strategies - thereby cultivating
resilience and mitigating iatrogenic
effects of healthcare related stress.
___________________________________
While acute st
ress reactions are common
initiall
y, they are typically mild to moderate
and short-lived.
305
A notabl
e minority (5
-
10%) of pe
diatric patients, however, will
develop post
traumatic stress symptoms that
persist l
ong after a healthcare encounter. If
left untr
eated, acute medical distress can
become a cli
nically
-verified PTSD
diagnosis,
inhibiting qua
lity of
life, impairing
day-to-day activi
ties, hindering adherence to
medical t
reatment, and, ultimately, leading
to poorer he
alth and functioning.
48,49
Therefore chil
dren and youth especially
require a
wide range of supports (e.g.,
education
about illness
or inju
ry, preparation
for procedures,
opportunities to play and
regain control
over their new environment)
in order t
o properly address PMTS and its
effects.
52
Identifying r
isk factors for the development
of PMTS i
s a critical assessment
component for
a
llaying po
tentially traumatic
healthcare e
xperiences and preventing
persistent
distress. Across illness and injury,
children’s subj
ective interpretations of the
severity
and threat of medical events are
one of the
most salient predictors of
enduring
PMTS,
48
appraisals whi
ch are
dependent upon their
unique developmental
history - including
ACEs, patterns and strata
of support
from families and communities,
and access to
coping resources. Thus, the
appraisals chil
dren make about their
healthcare en
counters an
d the respon
ses or
efforts
that their thought processes elicit can
be infinit
ely varied. It is imperative that
individual
ized coping interventions are
offered i
n developmentally appropriate
ways, necessit
ating the inclusion of child life
support.
306
Considering ho
w differently each case of
PMTS can
appear, a developmental and
contextual approach
is vital for preventative
intervention
s that support patient and family
post-discharge he
alth outcomes
-
interrelated
domains which are prioritized in
child life care. Modul
ating distress, providing
emotional sup
port, encouraging positive
coping, an
d explaining typical
development
al recovery processes, CCLSs
buffer
patients and families against the long
-
term psycho
logical deficits that can result
from ho
spitalizatio
n, alongside
the lingering
trauma t
hat accompanies it.
47
Certifi
ed Child
Life Speciali
sts are primely positioned to
32 | ACLP
assess for, prevent, and alleviate PMTS
symptoms in infants, children, youth, and
families through play-based, relationship-
reliant, and individualized psychosocial
care.
Infant Mental Health and Attachment
Even when a child is hospitalized in the first
few months of life, stress as a result of
hospitalization can have devastating effects
on health and development. Infant mental
health is an expeditiously emerging topic
within healthcare and psychology that
focuses on the social and emotional
development of children ages birth to five,
particularly as it relates to the child’s
developmental capacity, environment, and
family structure.
307
When an opportunity to
promote physical and social emotional
development is missed during infancy, the
infant will need to compensate for what they
were unable to achieve during that sensitive
peri
od of growth. Therefore, effective
intervention for infant development and
mental health should begin as early in life
as possible and be intensified as necessary
to achieve adaptive outcomes for
hospitalized infants.
308
In the context of their
targeted education and training, CCLSs
implement developmental play, non-
pharmacological pain management, parent
education and engagement, and help to
regulate environmental stimulation based on
the infant’s social emotional cues and
needs.
Optimal infant mental health outcomes
correlate with neurodevelopmental
processes, as well as the infant’s evolving
capacity to cope with stressful experiences,
regulate emotions, and form productive
attachment relationships. Attachment,
specifically, is a relational construct that
describes the child’s understanding of the
world as a trusting and safe environment,
usually a result of consistently positive
experiences with a primary
parent/caregiver.
29
The quality of the infant-
caregiver relationship, as indicated by the
construct of attachment style, has the
greatest impact on infant mental health
outcomes
307-313
but, separation from or loss
of the primary parent/caregiver, frequent
illness or hospitalizations, pain, and
environmental factors threaten attachment
and subsequent infant mental health
outcomes.
310,314
As practitioners who support the
psychosocial needs of the entire family,
CCLSs empower parents/caregivers to play
active roles in their infant’s daily care
throughout hospitalization, as this
participation directly promotes the formation
of positive and secure attachment.
315,316
Using clear communication and emotional
support to strengthen caregiving roles,
CCLSs help parents/caregivers form or
strengthen these seminal relationships with
their infant amidst the many risks and
stressors presented by healthcare
encounters.
317
For instance, a routine
attachment-promoting intervention
facilitated by CCLSs is touch, and whether a
child is intubated and sedated or has no
medical equipment creating barriers,
parent/caregiver touch provides an active
and constructive caregiving role that
establishes secure attachment.
318,319
Research continually demonstrates that
hospitalization delays the formation of
secure infant attachment,
315,320
and within
the walls of the Neonatal Intensive Care
Unit (NICU) in particular, manifestations of
hospitalization such as presence of medical
staff,
321
infant visual impairment,
319
infant
intellectual disabilities,
322
congenital
anomalies,
323
distance from
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 33
parent/caregi
ver,
316
and materna
l anxiety
and postpartu
m depression
324,325
negatively
impact t
his relationship
. In adultho
od, the
implications of
absent or malformed
attachments
are severe. Insecurely
attached ind
ividuals are 70% more likely to
report ch
ronic, widespread pain and
frequent
routine illnesses.
326,327
Striking
ly,
attachment
ratings
- though prima
rily
discussed in infanc
y
- are linked to
an array
of adult pa
thology. Avoidant attachment
ratings are linke
d to a broad range of
illnesses and condit
ions characterized by
pain; anxiou
s attachment is associated with
costly, life
threatening, and often
preventable health conditi
ons in adulthood,
including
stroke, heart attack, and high
blood pressure.
Secure attachment,
however,
holds no relationships to health
risks, il
lnesses, or disorders of any kind.
328
Certified
Child Life Specialists promote
positive social, emot
ional, and
development
al outcomes for infants by
providing suppo
rt and education to
parents/
caregivers,
309,312
thus target
ing the
future eff
ects of different attachment styles.
By addressing
infant pain and distress cues
both system
atically and consi
stently,
CCLSs
protect infan
ts' developmental trajectories
and foster
higher quality patient
-and-family-
centered care
experiences for patients,
families, and
institutions
329
- while also
mitigat
ing preventable health conditions in
adulthood.
Mental Health
Outcomes in Childhood
and Adolesce
nce
While the i
nability to form secure
attachments
and trusting relationships
affects deve
lopment beyond infancy,
decreased f
amily functioning, an impact of
chronic illne
ss, is also a contributor to the
recent ri
se
in mental
illness among children
and adolescents.
330,331
In the gene
ral
population of
the United States, the
prevalence of m
ental health disorders
among children is
16.5% (estimated as 7.7
million
children) with almost half of those
(49.4% na
tionally)
not receiving
counseling
or other
needed treatment from mental
health prof
essionals.
332
Perhaps even mor
e
alarming are
the recent statistics indicating
that pedi
atric emergency department (ED)
visits fo
r suicide attempt (SA) and/or
suicidal i
deation (SI) have
doubled - with
43% of t
hese being for children between the
ages of 5 and 11
years. Yet at the same
time, t
he number of emergency department
visits fo
r childhood injuries or illnesses has
seen little chang
e.
333
Mental he
alth, also referred to as behavioral
health in pe
diatric settings, is characterized
by an individu
al’s level of psychological
and/or psychosoci
al adjustment. The
symptoms of
mental illness and
psychological
maladjustment are often
categorized into ei
ther internalizing or
externalizing
behavio
rs. Inter
nalizing
behaviors incl
ude depressive symptoms,
withdraw
al, and anxiety, whereas
aggression and
active noncompliance with
behavioral exp
ectations are considered
externalizing
behaviors. In general,
internalizi
ng behaviors impact the individual,
initially,
while externalizing behaviors are
often directed
towards others.
330,331
Mental he
alth is a global epidemic, and
children wit
h chronic medical conditions are
at greate
r risk of mental health disorders,
especially w
hen compared to children
without such conditi
ons.
331,33
4
-337
While the
survival rat
e of children living with chronic
illness i
s nearly 90%, these conditions and
corresponding
treatments impose significant
stress on
children and families. Living with a
34 | ACLP
chronic illness is empirically associated with
negative psychosocial outcomes,
psychological maladjustment, incidence of
mental illness diagnoses, and symptoms of
anxiety and depression.
112,331,338-340
Moreover, having one mental illness
diagnosis significantly increases a child’s
risk of developing comorbid physical and
mental illness diagnoses that can further
diminish quality-of-life
339
- exemplifying the
bidirectional relationships between physical
and mental health operant throughout the
lifespan. Certified Child Life Specialists are
keenly aware of the impact healthcare
experiences can have on the mental health
of infants, children, and youth. Assessments
by CCLSs give attention to prevention of
misconceptions and the development of
adaptive coping behaviors. For instance,
teaching a child effective coping patterns
near initial diagnosis of a chronic illness can
lead to long-term, healthier patterns of
healthcare experiences for children and
their families.
What is most concerning is that research
reveals a higher prevalence of SI and SA in
children and youth with a history of
hospitalization and chronic illness, with
ideation and attempts directly related to the
reason for hospitalization.
341-343
The highest
risk for SA appear to be in the weeks
immediately following hospital admission,
but the risk appears elevated for five years
following onset of disease, and up to five
years post-discharge.
342,343
More
specifically, for children with type 1 diabetes
mellitus, the risk of psychiatric morbidity
(including SI) when compared with the
general population, triples for the first six
months after diagnosis, and double between
age of onset and the age of 18.
341
In
addition, increased risk of psychiatric
diagnoses and SA are proliferated among
individuals with a childhood onset of irritable
bowel disorder (IBD; including diagnoses of
Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and IBD
unspecified).
342
Moreover, when siblings
and parent/caregiver psychiatric histories
are also considered, there is a significant,
sustained association between childhood
onset of IBD, psychiatric disorders, and SA
for at least five years after diagnosis.
342
To date, studies have revealed that family
functioning and social isolation help to
moderate the relationship between chronic
illness and mental health disorders,
340,344
namely children’s mental health and general
well-being are improved when family
functioning is optimized.
340
However, the
sense of social isolation children and
adolescents experience during
hospitalization further threatens their
mental, behavioral, and emotional
stability.
344
Thus, the quality of survival, or
one’s Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-
QoL),
345
has become a contemporary focus
of research and intervention across the
healthcare sector. Furthermore, given the
prevalence of psychopathological needs
among children living with chronic
conditions, collaborative efforts from all
members of the healthcare team must be
reinforced via thorough screening,
prevention, and early identification.
346
Considering today’s trend of higher survival
rates for children with chronic medical
conditions, yet higher risk of mental health
disorders, simply surviving is no longer a
sufficient end goal. Certified Child Life
Specialists are members of the healthcare
team already working within domains that
optimize developmental trajectories and
prevent negative mental health outcomes
resulting from healthcare experiences.
Using a trauma-informed approach, CCLSs
teach adaptive coping strategies to manage
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 35
the typi
cal stressors involved in growing up,
as well as
the added chal
lenges po
sed by
chronic or acu
te medical conditions.
Certifi
ed Child Life Specialists increase
access to and
effective use of coping
strateg
ies, thereby mediating the effects of
chronic ill
ness on HR
-QoL.
112
The firs
t 12
months
after a medical diagnosis i
s
considered
a “critical intervention period” in
which children
demonstrate the highest
level of
need for emotional support and
adaptive copi
ng strategies.
338,34
1,342,346
Through
interventions such as therapeutic
and medical
play,
52
preparation
138,15
0
and
diagnosis
education,
112
coping
skills
education
,
124,12
8
and procedural
support,
75,98,
148,347
CCLSs
positively impact
parent
and child perception of disease, as
well as t
heir adjustment to illness related
limit
ations. Certified Child Life Specialists
facilitate peer
interaction through play,
group activit
ies, and online and
technolog
ically supported platforms of
communicat
ion to decrease social
isolation
330,33
7,344
; such i
nterventions provide
opportun
ities for positive childhood
experiences (
PCEs)
withi
n the context of
healthcar
e (e.g., feelings of control, mastery
of new ski
lls), thereby increasing active
engagemen
t with treatment throughout the
family syst
em and preventing additional
mental
and relational health issues into
adulthood
.
348
Sibling Support
As evidence
d by the dominant philosophy of
patient-and-famil
y
-centered
care across
healthcar
e institutions, a pediatric patient’s
medical
needs have resultant
– and often
substanti
al
– impact
s on all members of
their
identified family system. While
most
research on
PMTS focuses on patients and
parents
/caregivers, siblings, too, face
adverse develop
mental and psychosocial
consequences
as a result of stressful
medical
events, especially when their
unique needs
within the family are not
addressed. When a child is hospi
talized,
their
siblings struggle with separation from
family membe
rs, as well as feelings of
sadness, an
ger, anxiety, confusion,
loneline
ss, and jealousy that can last for
years and
contribute to increased family
conflict
.
349-351
These siblings m
ay exhibit
symptoms
of PMTS long after the patient’s
hospitali
zation or illness experience is over.
As many
as five years after the completion
of treat
ment, 81% of siblings of childhood
cancer survivors
reported posttraumatic
stress sy
mptoms, includ
ing 32%
exhibiting a
moderate
to severe reaction that predicted a
formal
diagnosis of PTSD.
352
These adverse
developmen
tal and psychosocial impacts
have devastating e
ffects on the sibling’s
immedi
ate and long
-term he
althcare usage
patter
ns, thereby challen
ging popu
lation
health outco
mes even in otherwise healthy
children.
Certifi
ed Child Life Specialists are the only
dedicated psycho
social healthcare
practition
ers who specifically extend their
patient-and-famil
y
-centered
interventions to
address the
behavio
ral and
psychosocial
health of
siblings. Successful sibling
interventi
ons typically include play,
developmen
tally appropriate health
education
, emotional support, advocating to
parents
/caregivers for siblings’ needs, and
teaching
coping strategies
353-355
- very
similar
to those proven effective in children
hospitali
zed for an illness or injury. For
example,
siblings of hospitalized children
displayed signi
ficant decreases in anxiety
after w
orking individually with a CCLS
356
;
and when pa
rticipating in play g
roups
facilit
ated by a child life professional,
siblings
benefited from medical play
36 | ACLP
interventions used to encourage emotional
expression, enacting themes such as
memories of health events, need for
parental attention, and impact of illness on
the family.
114
In the context of more trying circumstances,
both donor and non-donor siblings of
children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell
transplants highlight the integral role that
CCLSs play in providing therapeutic
interventions for siblings. Such services
were well received by siblings and family
members, in addition to healthcare
providers. For example, 100% of healthcare
providers reported that sibling meetings with
a CCLS were an important component of
the transplant process; in addition, the
sibling participants described child life
interventions as fun, helpful, and an
effective way to talk about their feelings.
357
Furthermore, the availability of child life
services improved both multidisciplinary
collaboration and patient and family
experience during transplant.
357,358
By
delivering interventions that address the
needs of siblings experiencing healthcare
hardship alongside pediatric patients,
CCLSs offer interventions that protect
against PMTS and encourage long-term
resilience, well-being, and coping that only
serves to benefit family health outcomes
throughout the lifespan.
Legacy Building
As has been seen, healthcare experiences
provoke a wide range of psychological and
developmental responses in infants,
children, adolescents, and their families. To
assist children and families in finding the
individualized sense of meaning needed to
effectively cope with their healthcare
encounters, CCLSs expressly offer legacy-
building interventions as a way to
therapeutically chronicle healthcare
journeys. The term “legacy building,”
distinctively coined and practiced by child
life professionals, describes a variety of
arts- and play-based efforts to help children
and their families reflect on their
experiences and create lasting memories
during illness, treatment, or
hospitalization.
359
While at times referred to
as “legacy making” or “memory making,”
these interventions are grounded in a
conceptual understanding of legacy as
“personal and relational summations of our
unique histories, current activities, and
hopes for the future.”
360(p43)
Children and
families can intentionally and tangibly create
a legacy through mediums like journaling,
scrapbooking, photography, video diaries,
collections, hand prints or molds, writing
letters, storytelling, and songwriting - some
of which are offered at upwards of 97% of
children’s hospitals.
361
Legacy can also be
developed serendipitously, without
forethought, and represented by intangible
items such as character traits, beliefs,
actions, and values. Whether helping a
patient recognize their constantly evolving
legacy or facilitating a targeted, tangible
activity, CCLSs ensure that the avenues
and mediums through which legacy is
explored by patients and families fits and
satisfies their individualized preferences.
Efforts to build memories and make
meaning out of difficult healthcare
experiences for children, adolescents, and
youth through legacy building can create an
important gateway for coping. When offered
by CCLSs, legacy-building interventions
provide patients and families with a chance
to purposefully and collaboratively
document their legacies (both ongoing and
established) through the hopeful framing of
activities, relationships, accomplishments,
and journeys - a technique promoting
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 37
legacies tha
t last beyond hospitalization
and
throughout
a lifetime.
360
Legacy act
ivities
have been fou
nd to promote self
-efficacy
in
patient
s, empowering them as they work to
create
lasting memories during extended,
signifi
cantly stressful, or end
-of-life
healthcar
e experiences.
362
This
empowerment and con
trol during a time
characteri
zed by uncertainty, fear, and
forced com
placency achieves something
always top-of-mind i
n child life care
- the
provision of
patient
-and-family choi
ce and
control.
For pat
ients nearing the end of life, legacy
building
proves additionally therapeutic, as
patient
s recognize their influence on the
lives of o
thers and develop a sense of
identity by
doing or saying something to be
remember
ed.
363-365
Histor
ically, legacy
-
building
interventions have encompassed
projects tha
t: 1) assist individuals and
families in
initiating the process of life
review an
d 2) result in a product that can be
enjoyed by
family and friends prior to and
after t
he individual's death.
363
Though t
hey
take man
y forms, children’s hospitals most
commonly
offer legacy
-building
at the end of
life through
mediums such as plaster hand
molds, gi
ving bereaved families an
intentional
and tangible way to remember
the dying
child.
361
However,
it is important to note that the
therapeu
tic value of these acti
vities
comes
not fr
om the objects they produce, but
rather t
he positive experience of connection,
collaborati
on, and control they engender at
the pinn
acle of stress and loss.
360
Certifi
ed
Child Lif
e Specialists recognize that
legacies last
far beyond death
and
keepsakes, an
d champion this awareness in
providers,
patients, and families, making
space and opport
unities for legacies to
manifes
t through self
-expression an
d
customized
celebration. As a result of
legacy-building
activities and the therapeutic
interactions
they facilitate, CCLSs fill a
compelling
void in health care
-
psychosocial
support for patients and
families as t
hey navigate personal
difficul
ties facing their family through the
hospitali
zation (or death) of a loved one.
Thus, engagi
ng in lega
cy-building
activities
supports
both patient and family coping in
the cont
ext of illness, promoting familial
engagemen
t and communication from the
day of di
agnosis, to the moment of
discharge,
or the time of death.
359-361
Bereavement
Support
An unfortun
at
e reali
ty that can generate or
exacerbate P
MTS in siblings and family
members al
ike is the death of a child.
The
grief an
individual experiences when a child
dies is more a
cute and prolonged than for
any other
familial loss.
366
Parents/car
egivers
can experience a
multitude of negative
psychosocial
outcomes as a result of their
child’s de
ath,
367-369
ranging
from clinical
anxiety and
depression
370
to sympt
oms of
posttrau
matic stress, to ultimately a clinical
diagnosis
of PTSD.
371
Negative
physiologi
cal repercussions are also
rampant i
n bereaved parents/caregivers,
resulti
ng in more physician consultations
and subsequent
hospitalizations, increased
pharmacolog
ical treatment, and decreased
productivity i
n the workforce.
372
Striki
ngly,
research ha
s demonstrated that a child’s
death is a
ssociated with increased mortality
in all be
reaved parents/caregivers, though
more sign
ificantly in mothers than fathe
rs.
373
Additi
onal empirical evidence suggests that
maternal
mortality increases by as much as
133%.
374
38 | ACLP
In line with the role and responsibilities of a
CCLS, the most salient predictor of long-
term complicated grief in bereaved
parents/caregivers is access to
psychological support and preparation prior
to the patient’s death.
367
Those with
knowledge of a loved one’s impending
death adapt better than those without
warning,
375
and, likewise, parents/caregivers
who receive psychological support during
the last month of their child’s life are better
equipped to work through grief, reporting
lower levels of persisting grief up to nine
years after their child’s death.
367
What is
more, qualitative reports validate these
findings, as parents/caregivers repeatedly
describe the importance of receiving
anticipatory guidance by psychosocial
professionals working in healthcare settings
to help them understand their child’s end of
life trajectory and cope more adaptively
after their child dies.
369
When asked to
reflect on their experiences, bereaved
parents specifically identified child life
services as “very helpful,” namely for the
developmentally appropriate education and
therapeutic play provided to the dying child
and their siblings; parents further suggested
that child life professionals should be
available across hospital, home, and clinic
settings as a family-centered support.
376
Aptly-timed and ongoing bereavement
support supplied by CCLSs improves
parent/caregiver grief and bereavement
outcome as it facilitates coping and
manages expectations in order to create
meaningful, manageable end-of-life
experiences.
Similar to their parents/caregivers, bereaved
siblings, too, keenly grieve the death of a
family member.
367
They suffer increases in
acute illnesses, hospitalizations, and
medication changes during the first six
months after their sibling’s death, which
have been found to persist for as long as 12
months after the death event.
377
Certified
Child Life Specialists efficaciously and
therapeutically adapt bereavement support
for siblings - which is highly rated by
bereaved parents/caregivers.
376
They
provide anticipatory guidance regarding
what to expect when their sibling dies,
significantly lowering levels of sibling
anxiety two to nine years after the fact.
378
Conversely, research reveals that bereaved
siblings who were dissatisfied with
communication at the end of the patient’s
life had higher distress, as well as greater
likelihood of unresolved grief, compared to
bereaved siblings who received
developmentally appropriate and sensitive
information.
378
___________________________________
When CCLSs provide preparation
specifically for children visiting a
family member in an adult intensive
care unit, as well as age appropriate
information about the illness and its
expected trajectory, children exhibit
fewer and less intense negative
emotional reactions.
381-384
___________________________________
With a strong understanding of how
developmental stages impact perceptions of
death, empathetic communication skills
adapted for individualized needs, and the
ability to establish a therapeutic relationship
with the family, CCLSs maintain unrivaled
positioning within multidisciplinary
healthcare teams to provide the preparation
and psychological support explicitly,
empirically, and anecdotally noted as
beneficial families. Using their scholarly
knowledge of child and family grief
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 39
processes, and de
velopmenta
l framew
orks
for children's
evolving conceptions of death
as final, i
rreversible, and universal, CCLSs
possess the ski
lls to explain such life events
to siblings i
n sensitive, deliberate, and
developmental
ly appropriate language.
Furthermo
re, their experti
se in
psychological prepara
tion is often utilized in
readying and
supporting siblings during
critical care
unit visits as patients near the
end of life,
even when the patient is a
parent, g
randparent, or another adult
relative.
379,380
When CCLSs provi
de
preparation spe
cifically for children visiting a
family member
in an adult intensive care
unit, as
well as age appropriate information
about the
illness and its expected trajectory,
children exhibit
fewer and less intense
negative emotio
nal reactions.
381-384
Thus, by
providing fam
ilies with honest and timely
information
that is delivered with
compassion and e
mpathy, CCLSs
remediate the
negative psychological and
physiological
consequences associated with
complicated bereave
ment experiences
across famil
y syste
ms.
Child Life
in Community Settings
Certified
Child Life Specialists also extend
their inva
luable psychosocial interventions
and support to
children and families in non
-
tradition
al, community
-based settings
385,386
-
outside tho
se considered as healthcare
settings. Th
e basis and rationale for this
expansion is
predicated on the
Child Life
Vision St
atement
,
387
which explains that
the
“practice of chi
ld life will be applicable to
any healthcar
e setting and transferable to
other communit
y settings or situatio
ns in
which the pot
ential for infants, children and
youth to cope,
learn, and master is placed
at risk.”
387(p1)
Hence, the si
x domains
interwoven in chi
ld life practice (see Figure
1) are comprised
of highly transferable
facets of
care, applicable in any s
etting
where children o
r families may experience
stress. When
CCLSs working in traditional
and non-tradition
al settings (e.g.
rehabilit
ation, private practice, and
community set
tings) were surveyed
about
offering sup
port for non
-illness-related
psychosocial stressors,
they reported
providing freq
uent assistance with other
family challen
ges such as divorce,
substance abuse
, poverty, homelessness,
and parental m
ental illness.
41
Certified
Child
Life Specialist
s address these stressors
through their
effectively
transferab
le coping
interventions
- those which impr
ove health
outcomes for
children and families across
care settings
.
Industry suppo
rt for the expansion of child
life services
in community settings amplifies
the aims an
d experiences of CCLS; the
American Academy of
Pediatrics
7
asserts
that child li
fe services are necessary beyond
the hospital
environment. To date, CCLSs
have already ad
apted the foundational
interventions
of their profession and
documented thei
r impacts in: recreational
and therapeut
ic ca
mps,
388
non-profit
agencies,
229
dentistry practi
ces,
389-391
early
childhood setti
ngs,
392,393
legal system
s and
child advocacy center
s,
394
prenatal
settings,
395
women’s centers,
396
bereavement p
rograms, funeral homes,
hospice and home health,
trauma or cris
is
teams, an
d behavioral health
clinics.
229,385,
397,398
While it is est
imated that approximately 7%
of all CCLS
s work in these non
-hospital
settings,
229
this proporti
on is growing in
stride wi
th changes in the healthcare
service delivery
model. Because cur
rent
healthcare quali
ty goals are aimed at
reducing acut
e care and extended
40 | ACLP
hospitalizations, many services are now
being provided in outpatient settings,
399
and
in order to best support today’s pediatric
patients and their families, many CCLSs are
developing private practice models and
exploring reimbursable billing schedules to
conti
nue this extension into the community.
Therefore, because the foundational skills
and interventions employed by Certified
Child Life Specialists (e.g., individualized
assessments, cultivation of a therapeutic
environment, coping skills education, and
psychological preparation) can be
implemented in various settings, the
potential for expansion of child life services
into additional service contexts is
innumerable.
Cultivating Resilience
Child life professionals, regardless of
setting, help weave an emotional and
psychological safety net for patients and
families, thus including CCLSs in standard
care protocols cultivates positive
development and, most importantly,
resilience. Resilience is a term used to
describe an individual’s ability to maintain
physical and psychological well-being
during and following times of significant
stress or adversity.
17,18
Resilience
encompasses
the evidence-based
phenomenon in which children and adults
are able to overcome difficulties and adapt
more effectively by capitalizing on the
strengths and abilities they already
possess,
400
all of which are embedded in the
foundations of child life practice. Certified
Child Life Specialists use integrative,
strengths-based approaches that support
patients and families through stressful
experiences, bridging the gaps between an
individual’s coping needs, their unique
strengths, and the task demands of
managing healthcare stress. By affirming
and facilitating positive coping,
17,19,20
problem solving, goal setting,
20,22
family
functioning, social support, and self-efficacy,
CCLSs foster resilience in children and
families facing medical
challenges,
17,22,24,401,402
thus enhancing
health-promoting behaviors and improving
relationships with providers.
19,21,191
It is widely demonstrated that disease-
specific factors can directly challenge
resilience and its associated health
outcomes; more specifically, illnesses that
are longer lasting or more severe are
associated with lower resilience and self-
esteem.
403,404
Findings have highlighted the
importance of interventions that promote
active coping and positive appraisals to
mitigate the negative effects of disease. Not
only do these interventions cultivate
resilience, but they also moderate symptom
severity and enable individuals to engage in
health promoting behaviors.
21
For example,
creating a disease narrative with patients
affords opportunities for them to make
meaning and exercise benefit-finding, while
also challenging inaccurate appraisals and
adjusting their beliefs about one’s ability to
control their own outcomes.
19,20,401
Moreover, interventions that promote
diagnosis education and problem-solving
behaviors in adolescents increase resilience
and foster self-efficacy and adherence.
20
Thus, interventions that assist patients and
families in processing their emotions,
thoughts, and experiences - such as those
provided by CCLSs - encourage adherence
and enhance quality-of-life.
191
Certified Child Life Specialists operate
under the premise that resilience can be
clinically cultivated through education, play,
and emotional support for pediatric patients
and their families. Fostering strong
therapeutic relationships, CCLSs recognize
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 41
that infants, children, youth, and
parents/caregivers ar
e capable of exercising
resilience throughout ev
en the most
stressful of exper
iences
- emerging on the
other side with renew
ed awareness of their
own internal coping resources
and
strategies.
405
Certified Child Lif
e Special
ists,
as multidisciplinary he
althcare team
members acutely attune
d to psychosocial
needs, understand t
heir ability to serve as
positive, non-familial allie
s and, while
employing healthy pati
ent
-provider
boundaries, act accordi
ngly. Certified Child
Life Specialists routinely
normalize
experiences and emotions t
hrough
therapeutic conversa
tion and activities, thus
filling a therapeu
tic role that is as comforting
as it is productive.
Strong, supportive
, consistent social
relationships are signif
icant predictors
of
resilience across age gro
ups and
conditions
401,404
; whether these
relationships
are with famili
es, peers, or non
-familial
adults (such as CCLS
s), the fact remains
that relationships prod
uce the qualities and
abilities individuals
need to engage in thei
r
care and achieve positi
ve health
outcomes.
17,19,21,402,4
04,406
-408
Grounded in the
therapeutic value o
f relationships, CCLSs
build resilience through t
he individualized,
trauma-informed, and developm
entally
appropriate care they provi
de to children
and families - the effects of which a
re broad
and enduring for physica
l and psychological
health. As the em
pirical links between
resilience and hope, optim
ism, self
-efficacy,
coping, meaning-making, and benef
it
-
finding
17
demonstrate CCLSs i
nstill
transferable skills, strengths,
and beliefs
that pediatric pat
ients and families can draw
upon during and be
yond their healthcare
encounters.
Conclusion
42 | ACLP
____________________________________________________________________________
Certified Child Life Specialists are members of the multidisciplinary care team that affect
positive outcomes for institutions, patients, and families, thus approaching the Quadruple Aim
and improving the healthcare industry in return. Certified Child Life Specialists empower
children and families at all ages and stages to become active, informed, and well-adjusted
consumers throughout their healthcare journey, no matter where it begins or leads. Resultant
reductions in anesthesia, sedation use, repeated tests/procedures due to coping difficulties,
pain medications, readmission rates, and overall length of stay equate to significant savings per
fiscal year scaled upon institutional programs, volumes, and performance. These impacts of
child life services transcend healthcare’s volume- and value-based service descriptors by
increasing throughput, minimizing waste, and improving the patient experience - all without
sacrificing quali
ty or substantially increasing expenditures. Certified Child Life Specialists
optimize resource use in the moment, while also cultivating a new generation of consumers that
will actively seek and sustain a more affordable, accessible, and effective healthcare industry
for all.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 43
Ac
k
nowl
edgem
ents
____________________________________________________________________________
T
he
au
tho
rs would like to acknowledge Janet Cross, MEd, CCLS, CPXP and Stephanie Van Dyke, CCLS
for the
i
r
s
upport of this project, as well as the many individuals who provided critical feedback on initial
drafts
, i
nc
l
uding: Stephanie Abbu, MSN,
RN; Marissa A
tti
s
,
MD; Michael W. Bishop, MD; Jason Brashier,
P
hD,
B
B
A, MA; Chris Brown, MS, CCLS; Sherwood Burns-Nade
r
,
P
hD, CCLS; Kathryn Cantrell, PhD,
CCLS
;
E
i
leen Clark, CCLS; Gary Clark; Sarah Daniels, MS, CCLS; J. Kevin Duplechain, MD, FACS; Ame
E
nri
gh
t;
Kris
F
a
l
l
on, PhD; James Gay, MD, MMHC; Megan Greffen, LMSW; Diane
Hart, MA, EDAC; Elise
Hebe
l
, M
S
, CCLS; Jim Hollender, MBA; Ellen C. Hollon, MS, CCLS; Yeh Hsueh, PhD; Katy Hudgins;
P
eg
gy
Jessee, PhD, CCLS; Jennifer A. Jewell, MD, MS, FAAP; Elizabeth McCarroll,
P
hD, CC
LS
; Amy
B
ul
l
oc
k Morse, PsyD, CCLS; Emily Mozena, MA, CCLS; Pamela Norcross, PhD, CCLS;Lori Anne Parker
-
Danl
ey
, P
hD; C
harles Phelps, PhD; Farya Phillips, PhD, CCLS; Leonard Rappaport, MD, MS; Judy
Rol
l
i
ns, PhD, RN; Teresa Schoell, MA, CCLS; Cara Si
s
k
, P
hD, CCLS; Jennifer Staab, MS, CCLS; Bindy
S
wee
tt,
CC
LS; Richard H. Thompson, PhD; Michelle Townsend
-B
ark
s
da
le, CCLS; Jessica Turnbull, MD,
MA
;
Di
v
na Wheelwright, MS, CCLS; Jeremy Willis, MBA; Denise Winsor, PhD; Jason A. Wolf, PhD,
CP
X
P
;
Lois Wolgemut
h,
C
CLS
,
and the staff and board of directors of the Association of Child Life
P
r
ofe
ssionals.
References
____________________________________________________________________________
1. Chee, T. T.
, Ryan, A.M., Wasfy
, J. H., & B
orden, W. B. (2016). Current state of value
-based pu
rchasing
programs. Circul
ation
, 133(22), 21
97
-2205.
2. Papani
colas, I., Woskie, L. R., & Jha, A. K. (2018). Health care spending in the United States and other
high-income c
ountries.
JAMA, 319(10), 1024-1039.
3. Schne
ider, E. C., Sarnak, D. O., Squires, D., Shah, A., & Doty, M. M. (2018). Mirror, mirror 2017:
Internationa
l comparison reflects flaws and opportunities for better US health care, 2017. Retrieved from:
https://int
eractives.commonwealthfund.org/2017/july/mirror
-mirror/
4. Institut
e of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001).
Crossing
the quality
chasm: A
new health system for
the 21st cen
tury
. Washingto
n DC; National Academies Press.
5. Assoc
iation of Child Life Professionals. (2018). Mission, values, vision. Retrieved August 29, 2019,
from https://www.chi
ldlife.org/the
-child-life-profession
/mission
-values-vision
6. Wolf, J
. A. (2018). Lessons for patient experience from the voices of pediatrics and children’s hospitals.
Patient
Experience Journal
, 5(2), 1-3.
7. Ameri
can Academy of Pediatrics. (2014). Child life services: Policy statement.
Pediatri
cs,
133(5),
e1471-e1478.
8. Beryl In
stitute. (2018). What patient experience can learn from child life professionals. Nashville, TN:
Beryl Ins
titute. Retrieved from
https://www.theb
erylinstitute.org/store/ViewProduct.aspx?id=11084124
9. Trotti
er
, E. D., Doré-Bergeron, M. J
., Chauvin
-Kimoff, L
., Baerg, K., & Ali, S. (2019). Managing pain and
distress
in children undergoing brief diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Paediatric
s & Child Health
,
24(8), 509-521.
10. Franke
l, L. R., Hsu, B. S., Yeh,
T. S., Sim
one, S., Agus, M. S., Arca, M. J., . . . & Gayle, M. O. (2019).
Criteria for Cr
itical Care Infants and Children: PICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Practice Statement
and Level
s of Care Guidance.
Pediatr
ic Critical Care Medicine
, 20(9), 847-887.
11.The Walt
Disney Company. (2018, March 7). The Walt Disney Company commits more than $100
Million
to bring comfort to children and their families in hospitals. Retrieved from:
https://www.thewa
ltdisneycompany.com/walt
-disney-company-commits-100-milli
on
-bring-comfort-
children-families-hospital
s
-2/
12. Gaynard, L., Wolf
er, J., Goldberger, J., Thompson, R., Redburn, L., & Laidley, L. (1990).
Psycho
social
care of chil
dren in hospitals: A clinical practice manual from the ACCH child life research project.
Bethesda,
MD: Association for the Care of Children's Health
.
13. Gursky, B
., Kestler, L. P., & Lewis, M. (2010). Psychosocial intervention on procedure
-related d
istress
in chil
dren being treated for laceration repair.
Journal
of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 31
(3),
217-222.
14. Mastro,
K. A., Flynn, L.,
Millar, T. F
., DiMartino, T. M., Ryan, S. M., & Stein, M. H. (2019). Reducing
anesthesi
a use for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: The effects of a patient
- and famil
y
-centered
interven
tion on image quality, health
-care costs, a
nd operational efficien
cy. Journal
of Radiology Nursing,
38(1), 21-27.
15. Steven
son, M. D., Bivins, C. M., O'brien, K., & del Rey, J. A. G. (2005). Child life intervention during
angiocath
eter insertion in the pediatric emergency department.
Pediatri
c Emergency Care, 21
(11), 712-
718.
16. Thompso
n, R. H., & Stanford, G. (1981).
Child li
fe in hospitals: Theory and practice
. Springfield
, IL:
Charles C. Thomas
.
17. Rosenberg,
A. R., Yi
-Frazier, J
. P., Wharton, C., Gordon, K., & Jones, B. (2014). Contributors and
inhibi
tors of resili
ence amo
ng adolescents and young adults with cancer.
Journal
of Adolescent and
Young A
dult Oncology, 3
(4), 185-193.
44 | ACLP
18. Yi-Frazier, J. P., McCauley, E., Fladeboe, K., Klein, V., Eaton, L., Wharton, C., & Rosenberg, A. R.
(2017). Promoting resilience in stress management for parents (PRISM-P): An intervention for caregivers
of youth with serious illness. Families, Systems, and Health, 35(3), 341-351.
19. Muther, E. F., Polineni, D., & Sawicki, G. S. (2018). Overcoming psychosocial challenges in cystic
fibrosis: Promoting resilience. Pediatric Pulmonology, 53, S86-S92.
20. Rosenberg, A. R., Yi-Frazier, J. P., Eaton, L., Wharton, C., Cochrane, K., Pihoker, C., . . . &
McCauley, E. (2015). Promoting resilience in stress management: A pilot study of a novel resili
ence-
promoting intervention for adolescents and young adults with serious illness. Journal of Pediatric
Psychology, 40(9), 992-999.
21. Huang, H., Chen, C., Chen, C., Yang, H., Su, W., Wang, J., & Tsai, P. K. (2018). A positive
perspective of knowledge, attitude, and practices for health-promoting behaviors of adolescents with
congenital heart disease. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 17(3), 217-225.
22. Hornor, G. (2017). Resilience. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 31(3), 384-390.
23. Roberts, J., Fenton, G., & Barnard, M. (2015). Developing effective therapeutic relationships with
children, young people and their families. Nursing children and young people, 27(4), 30-35.
24. Cousins, L. A., Kalapurakkel, S., Cohen, L. L., & Simons, L. E. (2015). Topical review: Resilience
resources and mechanisms in pediatric chronic pain. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40(9), 840-845.
25. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through i
mitation of
aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575.
26. Bowen, M. (1966). The use of family theory in clinical practice. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 7(5), 345-
374.
27. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: volume I: Attachment. London: The Hogarth Press and the
Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
28. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
29. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: WW Norton & Company.
30. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). S
tress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing
Company.
31. McCubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1983). The family stress process: The double ABCX model of
adjustment and adaptation. Marriage & Family Review, 6(1-2), 7-37.
32. Parten, M. B. (1932). Social participation among pre-school children. Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 27, 243-269.
33. Piaget, J. (1952). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: WW Norton & Co.
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Boston, MA: The M. I. T. Press.
35. Bibace, R., & Walsh, M. E. (1980). Development of children's concepts of illness. Pediatrics, 66(6),
912-917.
36. Bibace, R., & Walsh, M. E. (2016). Children’s conceptions of illness. In M. Watzlawik, A. Kreibel, & J.
Valsiner (Eds.), Particulars and universals in clinical and developmental psychology: Critical reflections
(pp. 65-82). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
37. Koopman, H. M., Baars, R. M., Chaplin, J., & Zwinderman, K. H. (2004). Illness through the eyes of
the child: the development of children's understanding of the causes of illness. Patient Education and
Counseling, 55(3), 363-370.
38. Perrin, E. C., & Gerrity, P. S. (1981). There's a demon in your belly: Children's understanding of
i
llness. Pediatrics, 67(6), 841-849.
39. Campbell, L., DiLorenzo, M., Atkinson, N., & Riddell, R. P. (2017). Systematic review: A systematic
r
eview of the interrelationships among children’s coping responses, children’s coping outcomes, and
parent cognitive-affective, behavioral, and contextual variables in the needle-related procedures context.
Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 42(6), 611-621.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 45
40. Folk
man, S., Lazarus
, R. S., Dun
kel
-Schett
er, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a
stress
ful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes.
Journa
l of Personality and
Socia
l Psychology
, 50(5), 992
.
41. Bottino
, C., Daniels, A., Chung, M., &
Dumais
, C. (2019). Child life specialists’ experiences
addressi
ng social determinants of health: A web
-based s
urvey.
Clinic
al Pediatrics, 58
(8), 851-856.
42. Si
lver, G., & Traube, C. (2019). A systematic approach to family engagement: Feasibility pilot of
a
pediatri
c delirium management and prevention toolkit.
Pall
iative & Supportive Care, 17
(1), 42-45.
43. Wi
lliams, N., Ben Birk, A., Petkus, J., & Clark, H. (2019). Importance of play for young people facing
illne
ss and hospitalization: rationale, opportuni
ties, an
d a case illustration.
Early
Child Development and
Care. Advanc
e online publication.
44. Berger
on, S., Noskoff, K., Hayakawa, J., & Frediani
, J. (2019).
Empowering adolescents and young
adults
to support, lead, and thrive: Development and validation of an AYA oncology child life program.
Journa
l of Pediatric Nursing, 47
.
45. Dobr
ozsi, S., Tomlinson, K., Chan, S., Belongia, M., Herda, C., Malo
ney, K
., . . . & Bingen, K. (2019).
Educat
ion milestones for newly diagnosed pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients: A
quali
ty improvement initiative.
Journa
l of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
. Adva
nce online publication.
46. Woo
d, E. B., Halv
erson, A.,
Harrison, G., & Rosenkranz, A. (2019). Creating a sensory
-friendl
y
pediatri
c emergency department.
Journa
l of Emergency Nursing, 45
(4), 415-424.
47. Marsac
, M., Kassam
-Adams, N.
, Hildenbrand, M., Nicholls, E., Winston, F., Leff, S., & Fein, J. (
2016).
Implemen
ting a trauma
-informe
d approach in pediatric networks.
JAMA
Pediatrics, 170
(1), 70-77.
48. Pr
ice, J., Kassam
-Adams, N.,
Alderfer, M., Christopherson, J., & Kazak, A. (2016). Systematic review:
A reev
aluation and update of the Integrative (Tr
ajectory
) Model of Pediatric Medical Traumatic Stress.
Journa
l of Pediatric Psychology, 41
(1), 86-97.
49. Kas
sam
-Adams, N.,
& Butler, L. (2017). What do clinicians caring for children need to know about
pediatri
c medical traumatic stress and the ethics of
trauma
informed approaches.
AMA J
ournal of Ethics,
19(8), 793-801.
50. And
a, R. F., Felitti, V. J., Bremner, J. D., Walker, J. D., Whitfield, C., Perry, B. D., . . . Giles, W. H.
(2006)
. The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in chi
ldhood
: A convergence of
evidenc
e from neurobiology and epidemiology.
Europea
n Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical
Neuroscie
nce, 256
, 174-186.
51. Burns-Nader, S., & Her
nandez
-Reif, M. (
2016). Facilitating play for hospitalized children through child
life servic
es.
Children's
Health Care, 45
(1), 1-21.
52. Sten
man, K., Christofferson, J., Alderfer, M. A., Pierce, J., Kelly, C., Schifano, E., . . . Kazak, A. E.
(2019)
. Integrating play in trauma
-informed c
are: Multidisciplinary pediatric healthcare provider
perspecti
ves.
Psyc
hological Services, 16
(1), 7-15.
53. Merric
k, M. T., Ford, D. C., Ports, K. A., & Guinn, A. S. (2018). Prevalence of adverse childhood
experi
ences from the 2011
-2014 Be
havioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 23 states.
JAMA
Pediatr
ics
, 172(11), 1038-1044.
54. Marsac, M
., Kassam
-Adams, N.
,
Delahan
ty, D., Widaman, K., & Barakat, L. (2014). Posttraumatic
stress
following acute medical trauma in children: A proposed model of bio
-psycho-social
processes
durin
g peri
-trauma p
eriod.
Clinic
al Child and Family Psychology Review, 17,
399-411.
55. Cole, M. B
., & McLean, V. (2003). Therapeutic relationships re
-defined
.
Occup
ational Therapy in
Mental H
ealth, 19
(2), 33-56.
56. Grav
es, T. A., Tabri, N., Thompson
-Brenn
er, H., Franko, D. L., Eddy, K. T., Bourion
-Bedes, S
., . . .
Thomas
, J. J. (2017). A meta
-analy
sis of the relation between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome
in eating
disorders.
Internati
onal Journal of Eating Disorders, 50
, 323-340.
57. Leac
h, M. J. (2005). Rapport: A key to treatment success.
Complemen
tary Therapies in
Clini
cal
Practi
ce, 11,
262-265.
46 | ACLP
58. Pinto, R. Z., Ferreira, M. L., Oliveira, V. C., Franco, M. R., Adams, R., Maher, C. G., & Ferreira, P. H.
(
2010). Patient-centered communication is associated with positive therapeutic alliance: A systematic
review. Journal of Physiotherapy, 58, 77-87.
59. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2018). The power of play: A pediatric role in enhancing
development in young children. Pediatrics, 142(3), e20182058.
60. Ginsburg, K. R. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and
maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119(1), 182-191.
61. Grissom, S., Boles, J., Bailey, K., Cantrell, K., Kennedy, A., Sykes, A., & Mandrell, B. (2016). Play-
based procedural preparation and support intervention for cranial radiation. Supportive Care in Cancer,
24, 2421-2427.
62. Jaaniste, T., Hayes, B., & von Baeyer, C. L. (2007). Providing children with information about
forthc
oming medical procedures: A review and synthesis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice,
14(2), 124-143.
63. Cejda, K. R., Smeltzer, M. P., Hansbury, E. N., McCarville, M. E., Helton, K. J., & Hankins, J. S.
(
2012). The impact of preparation and support procedures for children with sickle cell disease undergoing
MRI. Pediatric Radiology, 42, 1223-1228.
64. Brewer, S., Gleditsch, S. L., Syblik, D., Tietjens, M. E., & Vacik, H. W. (2006). Pediatric anxiety: Child
l
ife intervention in day surgery. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 21(1), 13-22.
65. Scott, L., Langton, F., O’Donoghue, J. (2002). Minimising the use of sedation/anesthesia in young
children receiving radiotherapy through an effective play preparation programme. European Journal of
Oncology Nursing 6(1), 15-22.
66. Athanassiadou, E., Tsiantis, J., Christogiorgos, S., & Kolaitis, G. (2009). An evaluation of
psychological preparation of children for minor surgery by puppet play and brief mother counseling.
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78, 62-63.
67. Cuzzocrea, F., Gugliandolo, M. C., Larcan, R., Romeo, C., Ruriaco, N., & Dominici, T. (2013). A
psychological preoperative program: Effects on anxiety and cooperative behaviors. Pediatric Anesthesia,
23, 139-143.
68. Barnea-Goraly, N., Weinzimer, S. A., Ruedy, K. J., Mauras, N., Beck, R. W., Marzelli, M. J., . . . &
F
ox, L. (2014). High success rates of sedation-free brain MRI scanning in young children using simple
subject preparation protocols with and without a commercial mock scanner - the Diabetes Research in
Children Network (DirecNet) experience. Pediatric Radiology, 44, 181-186.
69. Fortier, M. A., Bunzli, E., Walthall, J., Olshansky, E., Saadat, H., Satistevan, R. (2015). Web-ba
sed
tailored intervention for preparation of parents and children for outpatient surgery (WebTIPS): Formative
evaluation and randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 120(4), 915-922.
70. Li, H. C. M., Lopez, V., & Lee, T. L. I. (2007a). Effects of preoperative therapeutic play on outcomes of
s
chool-age children undergoing day surgery. Research in Nursing and Health, 30, 320-332.
71. de Amorim e Silva, C. J., Mackenzie, A., Hallowell, L. M., Stewart, S. E., & Ditchfield, M. R. (2006).
P
ractice MRI: Reducing the need for sedation and general anesthesia in children undergoing MRI.
Australasian Radiology, 50(4), 319-323.
72. MacLaren, J. E. & Kain, Z. N. (2007). Pediatric preoperative preparation: A call for evidence-based
practice. Pediatric Anesthesia, 17, 1019-1020.
73. Boles, J. (2018). The powerful practice of distraction. Pediatric Nursing, 44(5), 247-251.
74. Koller, D., & Goldman, R. D. (2012). Distraction techniques for children undergoing procedures: A
critical review of pediatric research. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 27(6), 652-681.
75. Burns-Nader, S., Joe, L., & Pinion, K. (2017). Computer tablet distraction reduces pain and anxiety in
pediatric burn patients undergoing hydrotherapy: A randomized trial. Burns, 43, 1203-1211.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 47
76. Or
tiz, G. S., O’Connor, T., Carey, J., Vella, A., Paul, A., Rode, D., & Weinberg, A. (2017). Impact of a
chil
d life and music therapy procedural
suppo
rt intervention on parental perception of their child’s distress
duri
ng intravenous placement.
Pedi
atric Emergency Care, 35
(7), 498-505.
77. Can
bulat, N., Inal, S., & Sonmezer, H. (2014). Efficacy of distraction methods on procedural pain
anxi
ety by a
pply
ing distraction cards and kaleidoscope in children.
Asi
an Nursing Research, 8,
23-28.
78. Go
ld, J. I., Kim, S. H., Kant, A. J., Joseph, M. H., & Rizzo, A. (2006). Effectiveness of virtual reality for
pedi
atric pain distraction during IV placement.
CyberPs
ychology & Behavior, 9
(2), 20
7
-212.
79. K
arakaya, A., & Gozen, D. (2016). The effect of distraction on pain level felt by school
-age c
hildren
duri
ng venipuncture procedure
- Randomi
zed controlled trial.
Pai
n Management Nursing, 17
(1), 47-53.
80. B
erg
omi,
P., Schudeller, L., Pintaldi, S., & Dal Molin, A. (2018). Efficacy of non
-pharmac
ological
method
s of pain management in children undergoing venipuncture in a pediatric outpatient clinic: A
rando
mized controlled trial of audiovisual distraction and ext
ernal c
old and vibration.
Jour
nal of Pediatric
Nursi
ng, 42,
e66-e72.
81. Qu
an, X., Joseph, A., Nanda, U., Moyano
-Smit
h, O., Kanakri, S., Ancheta, C., & Loveless, E. A.
(2016
). Improving pediatric radiography patient stress, mood, and parental satisfaction
through p
ositive
envi
ronmental distractions: A randomized control trial.
Jour
nal of Pediatric Nursing, 31,
e11-e22.
82. S
ola, C., Lefauconnier, A., Bringuier, S., Raux, O., Capdevila, X., & Dadure
, C. (2017
). Childhood
preoperativ
e anxiolysis: Is sedation and distraction better than either alone? A prospective randomized
study
.
Pedi
atric Anesthesia, 27,
827-834.
83. Meg
el, M. E., Houser, C. W., & Gleaves, L. S. (1998). Children's responses to immu
nizat
ions:
Lull
abies as a distraction.
Iss
ues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 21,
129-145.
84. Dowl
lman, D. (2003). Pharmacological versus nonpharmacological techniques to reducing
veni
puncture psychological trauma in pediatric patients.
Jour
nal of In
fusion
Nursing, 26
(2), 103-109.
85. Leroy
, P. L., Costa, L. R., Emmanouil, D., van Beukering
, A.
, & Franck, L. S. (2016). Beyond the
drugs: Nonp
harmacological strategies to optimize procedural care in children.
Curr
ent Opinion in
Anaes
thesiology, 29
(1), S1-S13.
86. Dray
ton, N. A., Waddups, S., & Walker, T. (2019). Exploring distraction and the i
mpac
t of a child life
spec
ialist: Perceptions from nurses in a pediatric setting.
Jour
nal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 24
,
e12242
.
87. Carter
, A. J., Greer, M. C., Gray, S. E., & Ware, R. S. (2010). Mock MRI: Reducing the need for
anaes
thesia in c
hildren. Pedi
atric Radiology, 40
(8), 13
68
-1374.
88. E
smonde, N., Jedrzejewski, B., Fitzpatrick, B., Koh, J., Bardo, D., Urbinelli, L., . . . Kuang, A. (2019).
Feed a
nd Swaddle: An Alternative to Infant Sedation for Craniofacial Imaging
. The Cl
eft Palate
-
Crani
ofacial Journal.
89. K
han, J. J., Donnelly, L. F., Koch, B. L., & Curtwright, L. A. (2007). A program to decrease the need
for pediatr
ic sedation for CT and MRI.
Appl
ied Radiology, 36
(4), 30-33.
90. K
ino, A., Zucker, E. J., Honkanen, A., Kneebone, J.
Wang
, J., Chan, F., & Newman, B. (2019).
Ultrafa
st pediatric chest computed tomography: Comparison of free
-breathin
g vs. breath
-hold i
maging
with an
d without anesthesia in young children.
Pedi
atric Radiology, 49
, 301-307.
91. Run
ge, S. B., Christensen, N.
L., Je
nsen, K., & Jensen, I. E. (2018). Children centered care:
Mini
mizing the need for anesthesia with a multi
-facete
d concept for MRI in children aged 4
-6. Europea
n
Jour
nal of Radiology, 107
, 183-187.
92. S
cott, M. T., Todd, K. E., Oaakley, H., Bradley,
J. A
., Rotondo, R. L., Morris, C. G., . . . Indelicato, J.
D. (201
6). Reducing anesthesia and health care cost through utilization of child life specialists in pediatric
radi
ation oncology
. Internat
ional Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 96
(2), 401-405.
93. de B
ie, H. M. A., Boersma, M., Wattjes, M. P., Adriaanse, S., Vermeulen, R. J., Oostrom, K. J., . . .
Delema
rre
-Van
de Waal, H. A. (2010). Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in
high q
uality structural and func
tiona
l MRI scans.
Europea
n Journal of Pediatrics, 169
(9), 107
9
-1085
.
48 | ACLP
94. Dong, S. Z., Zhu, M., & Bulas, D. (2019). Techniques for minimizing sedation in pediatric MRI. Journal
of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 50(4), 1047-1054.
95. Hallowell, L. M., Stewart, S. E., de Amorim e Silva, C. T., & Ditchfield, M. R. (2008). Reviewing the
process of preparing children for MRI. Pediatric Radiology, 38, 271-279.
96. Rudder, B. S., Easley, S. J., Robinson, A. L., Noel-MacDonnell, J. R., & Nielsen, D. B. (2019). Effects
of an MRI Try Without program on patient access. Pediatric Radiology, 1-6.
97. Durand, D. J., Young, M., Nagy, P., Tekes, A., & Huisman, T. A. (2015). Mandatory child life
c
onsultation and its impact on pediatric MRI workflow in an academic medical center. Journal of the
American College of Radiology, 12(6), 594-598.
98. Elitsur, R., Hollenbeck, A., Tasan, L., Torok, K. S., Cassidy, E., Blasiole, B., . . . Angelelli, I. C. (2019).
E
fficacy and cost savings with the use of a minimal sedation/anxiolysis protocol for intra-articular
corticosteroid injections in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective review of prospectively
collected data. Pediatric Rheumatology, 17(1), 11.
99. Willis, D., & Barry, P. (2010). Audiovisual interventions to r
educe the use of general anaesthesia with
paediatric patients during radiation therapy. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 54, 249-
255.
100. Kain, Z., Caldwell-Andrews, A., Mayes, L., Weinberg, M, Wang, S., MacLaren, J., & Blount, R.
(2007). Family-centered preparation for surgery improves perioperative outcomes in children: A
randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology, 106(1), 65-74.
101. Seiden, S. C., McMullan, S., Sequera-Ramos, L.,
De Oliveira, G. S., Roth, A., Rosenblatt, A., . . .
S
uresh, S. (2014). Tablet-based interactive distraction (TBID) vs oral midazolam to minimize
perioperative anxiety in pediatric patients: A noninferiority randomized trial. Pediatric Anesthesia, 24,
1217-1223.
102. Stewart, B., Cazzell, M. A., & Pearcy, T. (2019). Single-blinded randomized controlled study on use
of interactive distraction versus oral midazolam to reduce pediatric preoperative anxiety, emergence
delirium, and postanesthesia length of stay. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 34(3), 567-575.
103. Fraser, C., Gray, S., & Boles, J., (2019). Patient awake while scanned: Program to reduce the need
for anesthesia in pediatric MRI. Pediatric Nursing, 45(6), 283-288.
104. Tornqvist, E., Mansson, A. & Hallstrom,
I. (2015). Children having magnetic res
onance imaging: A
preparatory storybook and audio/visual media are preferable to anesthesia or deep sedation. Journal of
Child Health Care, 19(3), 359-369.
105. Luehmann,
N. C., Staubach, M. E., Akay, B
., Collier, P. J., Han, R. E., Riggs, T. W., & Novotny, N.
M. (2019). Benefits of a family-centered approach to pediatric induction of anesthesia. Journal of Pediatric
Surgery, 54(1), 189-193.
106. Dastgheyb, S., Flishlock, K., Daskalakis, C., Kessel, J., & Rosen, P. (2018). Evaluating comfort
measures for commonly performed painful procedures in pediatric patients. Journal of Pain Research, 11,
1383-1390.
107. Marechal, C., Berthiller, J., Tosetti, S., Cogniat, B., Desombres, H., Bouvet, L., . . . de Queiroz
Siqueira, M. (2017). Children and parental anxiolysis in paediatric ambulatory surgery: A randomized
controlled study comparing 0.3 mg kg -1 midazolam to tablet computer based interactive distraction.
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 118(2), 247-253.
108. Fortier, M. A., del Rosario, A. M., Martin, S. R., & Kain, N. Z. (2010) Perioperative anxiety in children.
Pediatric Anesthesia, 20, 318-322.
109. Fortier, M. A., del Rosario, A. M., Rosenbaum, A., & Kain, Z. N. (2010). Beyond pain: Predictors of
postoperative maladaptive behavior change in children. Pediatric Anesthesia, 20, 445-453.
110. Kain, Z. N., Mayes, L. C., Caldwell-Andrews, A. A., Karas, D. E., & McClain, B. C. (2006).
Preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain and behavioral recovery in young children undergoing surgery.
Pediatrics, 118(2), 651-658.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 49
111. Com
pas
, B., C
onner
-Smi
th, J., Saltzman, H., Harding, A., & Wadsworth, M. (2001). Coping with
stres
s during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research.
Psy
chological Bulletin, 127
(1), 87-127.
112. Hons
, A., Eliott, J., Wil
son, A
., & Kettler, L. (2008). Understanding young peoples' experience of
chronic
illness: A systematic review.
Integr
ated Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare, 6,
321-336.
113. O
sterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005). Adherence to medication.
New Eng
land Jou
rnal
of Medicine,
353(5), 48
7
-497.
114. Nab
ors, L., Bartz, J., Kichler, J., Sievers, R., Elkins, R., & Pangallo, J. (2013). Play as a mechanism
of work
ing through medical trauma for children with medical illnesses and their siblings.
Issue
s in
Compre
hensiv
e Nurs
ing, 36
(3), 212-224.
115. P
otasz, C., Varela, M., Carvalho, L., Prado, L., Prado, G. (2013). Effect of play activities on
hospi
talized children's stress: a randomized clinical trial.
Sca
ndinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy,
20, 71-79.
116. G
ar
iepy
, N., & Howe, N. (2003). The therapeutic power of play: Examining the play of young children
with l
eukemia.
Chil
d Care, Health, and Development, 29
(6), 523-537.
117. K
oller, D. (2018). Anxiety and the hospitalized child: Best practices for guiding ther
apeuti
c play. In
Drewes, A
. & Schafer, C. (Eds.),
Play-base
d interventions for childhood anxieties, fears, and phobias
(pp.
15-26). N
ew York, NY: Guilford.
118. Y
ogman, M., Garner, A., Hutchinson, J., Hirsh
-Pasek
, K., & Golinkoff, R. (2018). The power of p
lay:
A pedi
atric role in enhancing development in young children.
Pedi
atrics, 142
(3), 1-15.
119. S
almela, M., Salantera, S., Ruotsalainen, T., & Aronen, E. (2010). Coping strategies for hospital
-
relate
d fears in preschool aged children.
Journa
l of Paediatr
ics
and Child Health, 46,
108-114.
120. E
llerton, M., Caty, S., & Ritchie, J. (1985). Helping young children master intrusive procedures
through pl
ay.
Chil
dren's Health Care, 13
(4), 16
7
-173.
121. Mo
ore, M., & Russ, S. (2006). Pretend play as a resource f
or chi
ldren: Implications for pediatricians
and he
alth professionals.
Jour
nal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 27
, 237-248.
122. Rae,
W., Sullivan, J., & Askins, M. (2016). Play interventions for hospitalized children. In L. Reddy,
T. Fil
es
-Hall, & C.
Schaefer (Eds.),
Empi
rically based play interventions for children
(2nd
ed., pp. 115
-
133). W
ashington, DC: American Psychological Association.
123. Chok
ephaibulkit, K., Tarugsa, J., Lolekha, R., Leowsrisook, P., Manaboriboon, B., Naiwatanakul, T.,
. . . B
oon
-yashi
dhi, V. (2015). Outcomes of a comprehensive youth program for HIV
-infec
ted adolescents
in Thai
land.
Jour
nal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 26
(6), 758-769.
124. G
rey, M., Whittemore, R., Jaser, S., Ambrosino, J., Lindemann, E.,
Liberti
, L., . . . Dziura, J. (2009).
Effec
ts of coping skills training in school
-age c
hildren with type 1 diabetes.
Researc
h in Nursing and
Health,
32
(4), 405-418.
125. Nab
ors, L., Stough
, C., Com
bs, A., & Elkins, J. (2019). Implementing the Coping Positively with My
Worri
es manual: A pilot study.
Jour
nal of Child and Family Studies,
1-10.
126. S
ansom
-Daly
, U. M., Peate, M., Wakefield, C. E., Bryant, R. A., & Cohn, R. J. (2012). A systema
tic
revi
ew of psychological interventions for adolescents and young adults living with chronic illness.
Healt
h
Psy
chology, 31
(3), 38
0
-393.
127. S
rof, B. J., Velsor
-Fri
edrich, B., & Penckofer, S. (2012). The effects of coping skills training among
teens w
it
h asthm
a.
Wester
n Journal of Nursing Research, 34
(8), 104
3
-1061
.
128. W
hittemore, R., Jaser, S., Jeon, S., Liberti, L., Delamater, A., Murphy, K.,. . . Grey, M. (2012). An
inter
net coping skills training program for youth with type 1 diabetes.
Nursi
ng Rese
arch, 61(6), 395-404.
129. Hol
mes, C. S., Chen, R., Mackey, E., Grey, M., & Streisand, R. (2014). Randomized clinical trial of
cli
nic
-integrate
d, low
-intens
ity treatment to prevent deterioration of disease care in adolescents with type
1 diab
etes.
Diab
etes
Care, 37
,
1535-1543.
50 | ACLP
130. Clark, L. A., Whitt, S., & Lyons, K. (2019). Improving communication between health care providers,
families, and children with autism spectrum disorder: The linked program. Journal of PeriAnesthesia
Nursing, 34(5), 889-899.
131. Gettis, M. A., Wittling, K., Palumbo-Dufur, J., McClain, A., & Riley, L. (2018). Identifying best practice
for healthcare providers caring for autistic children perioperatively. Worldviews on Evidence-Based
Nursing, 15(2), 127-129.
132. Straus, J., Coburn, S., Maskell, S., Pappagianopoulos, J., & Cantrell, K. (2019). Medical encounters
for youth with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review of environmental considerations and
interventions. Clinical Medicine Insights: Pediatrics, 13.
133. Wittling, K., Dufur, J., McClain, A., & Gettis, M. (2018). Behavioral coping plans: One inter-
professional team's approach to patient-centered care. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 41, 135-139.
134. Harrison, D., Joly, C., Chretien, C., Cochrane, S., Ellis, J., Lamon
tagne, C., & Regis, V. (2014). Pain
prevalence in a pediatric hospital: Raising awareness during pain awareness week. Pain Research and
Management, 19(1), e24-e30.
135. Kennedy, R. M., Juhman, J., & Zempsky, W. T. (2008). Clinical implications of unmanaged needle-
insertion pain and distress in children. Pediatrics, 122(3), S130-S133.
136. Anand, K. J., & Scalzo, F. M. (2000). Can adverse neonatal experiences alter brain development
an
d subsequent behavior? Biology of the Neonate, 77(2), 69-82.
137. Fernandes, S. C., Arriaga, P., & Esteves, F. (2014). Providing preoperative information for children
undergoing surgery: a randomized study testing different types of educational material to reduce
children's preoperative worries. Health Education Research, 29(6), 1058-1076.
138. West, N., Christopher, N., Stratton, K., Gorges, M., & Brown, Z. (2019, forthcoming). Reducing
preop
erative anxiety with child life preparation prior to intravenous induction of anesthesia: A randomized
controlled trial. Pediatric Anesthesia.
139. Li, H. C. W., & Lopez, V. (2008). Effectiveness and appropriateness of therapeutic play intervention
i
n preparing children for surgery: A randomized controlled trial study. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric
Nursing, 13(2), 63-73.
140. Li, H. C., Lopez, V., & Lee, T. L. I. (2007b). Psychoeducational preparation of children for surgery:
T
he importance of parental involvement. Patient Education and Counseling, 65, 34-41.
141. Sabaq, A. G. & El-Awady, S. (2012). The effect of pre-operative preparation program and mothers
presence during induction on anxiety level and behavior change in young children undergoing elective
surgery. Life Science Journal, 9(4), 3798-3807.
142. Wennstrom, B., Tornhage, C. J., Nasic, S.., Hedelin, H., & Bergh, I.
(2011). The perioperative
dialogue reduces postoperative stress in children undergoing day surgery as confirmed by salivary
cortisol. Pediatric Anesthesia, 21(10), 1058-1065.
143. Wong, C. L., Ip, W. Y., Kwok, B. M. C., Choi, K. C., Ng, B. K. W., & Chan, C. W. H. (2018). Effects of
therapeutic play on children undergoing cast-removal procedures: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ
Open, 8(7), e021071.
144. Fincher, W., Shaw, J., & Ramelet, A. (2012). The effectiveness of a standardised preoperative
preparation in reducing child and parent anxiety: A single-blind randomised controlled trial. Journal of
Clinical Nursing, 21, 946-955.
145. Kolk, A. M., van Hoof, R., & Dop, F. (2000). Preparing
children for venipuncture: The effect of an
integrated intervention on distress before and during venipuncture. Child: Care, Health and Development,
26(3), 251-260.
146. Moore, E., Bennett, K., Dietrich, M., & Wells, N. (2015). The effect of directed medical play on young
children’s pain and discomfort during burn wound care. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 23(3), 265-273.
147. Piskorz, J., & Czub, M. (2018). Effectiveness of a virtual reality intervention to minimize pediatric
s
tress and pain intensity during venipuncture. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 23(1), e12201
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 51
148. S
anchez Cristal, N., Staab, J., Chatham, R., Ryan, S., Mcnair, B., & Grubenhoff, J. A. (2018). Child
lif
e reduces distress and pain and improves family satisfaction in
the pe
diatric emergency department.
Clini
cal pediatrics
, 57(13)
, 1567
-1575.
149. B
rown N. J., David, M., Cuttle, L., Kimble, R. M., Rodger, S., & Higashi, H. (2015). Cost
-
effecti
veness of a nonpharmacological intervention in pediatric burn care.
Val
ue in H
ealth
, 18, 631
-637.
150. B
artik, K. & Tourner, E. K. (2017). Effectiveness of a preoperative preparation program on children’s
emoti
onal states and parental anxiety.
Jour
nal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 33
(6), 9
72
-980.
151. K
ada, S., Satinovic, M., Booth, L.
, &
Miller, P. K. (2019). Managing discomfort and developing
parti
cipation in non
-emerge
ncy MRI: Children’s coping strategies during their first procedure.
Radiogr
aphy, 25
, 10-15.
152. Cop
anitsanou, P. & Valkeapaa, K. (2013). Effects of education on paedia
tric
patients undergoing
elect
ive surgical procedures on their anxiety
- a sy
stematic review.
Journa
l of Clinical Nursing, 23
, 940-
954.
153. Dah
lquist, L. M., Busby, S. M., Slifer, K. J., Tucker, C. L., Eischen, S., Hilley, L., & Sulc, W. (2002).
Distr
acti
on for c
hildren of different ages who undergo repeated needle sticks.
Jour
nal of Pediatric
Oncol
ogy Nursing
, 19(1), 22-34.
154. Klos
ky, J. L., Garces
-Webb,
D. M., Buscemi, J., Schum, L., Tyc, V. L. & Merchant, T. E. (2007).
Exam
ination of an interactive
-educati
on intervention in improving parent and child distress outcomes
assoc
iated with pediatric radiation therapy procedures.
Childre
n's Healthcare, 36
(4), 323-334.
155. Diene
r, M., Lofgren, A., Isabella, R., Magana, S., Choi, C., & Gourley, C. (2018). Chi
ldren’
s distress
duri
ng intravenous placement: The role of child life specialists.
Chil
dren's Health Care, 48
(5), 1-17.
156. Mc
Carthy, A. M., Kleiber, C., Hanrahan, K., Zimmerman, M. B., Ersig, A., Westhus
, N., & A
llen, S.
(2014
). Matching doses of distraction with child risk for distress during a medical procedure.
Nursi
ng
Resear
ch, 63
(6), 397-407.
157. G
old, J. L., & Mahrer, N. E. (2018). Is virtual reality ready for prime time in medical space? A
rando
mi
zed c
ontrol trial of pediatric virtual reality for acute procedural pain management.
Journa
l of
Pedi
atric Psychology, 43
(3), 266-275.
158. S
hahid, R., Benedict, C., Mishra, S., Mulye, M., & Guo, R. (2015). Using ipads for distraction to
reduc
e pain during
immu
nizations.
Clini
cal Pediatrics, 54
(2), 145-148.
159. Bol
es, J. (2013). Speaking up for children undergoing procedures: The ONE VOICE approach.
Pedi
atric Nursing
, 39(5), 257-260.
160. Steph
ens, B. K., Barkey, M. E., & Hall, H. R. (1999). Techniques to c
omfor
t children during stressful
procedures
.
Acc
ident and Emergency Nursing, 7
(4), 226-236.
161. Lacey
, C. M., Finkelstein, M., & Thygeson, M. V. (2008). The impact of positioning on fear during
immun
izations: Supine versus sitting up.
Jour
nal of Pediatric
Nursi
ng, 23
(3), 195-200.
162. S
parks, L., Setlik, J., & Luhman, J. (2007). Parental holding and positioning to decrease IV distress
in you
ng children: A randomized controlled trial.
Jour
nal of Pediatric Nursing
, 22(6), 440-447.
163. Sven
dsen, E. J., Moen, A., Pedersen, R., & Bjork, I. T. (2018). "But perhaps they could reduce the
sufferin
g?" Parents' ambivalence toward participating in forced peripheral vein cannulation performed on
their
preschool
-aged c
hildren.
Jour
nal of Pediatric
Nursi
ng, 41
, e46-e51.
164. Kahram
an, A., Basbakkal, Z., Yalaz, M., & Sozmen, E. Y. (2018). The effect of nesting positions on
pain,
stress and comfort during heel lance in premature infants.
Pedi
atrics and Neonatology, 59
, 352-359.
165. K
oller, D. (2016)
. Ki
ds need to talk, too': Inclusive practices for children's healthcare education and
parti
cipation.
Jour
nal of Clinical Nursing, 26
, 2657-2668.
166. S
tein, A., Dalton, L., Rapa, E., Bluebond
-Langn
er, M. Hanington, L., Stein, K. F., . . . Yousafzai, A.
(2019). Com
munication with children and adolescents about the diagnosis of their own life
-threateni
ng
condi
tion.
Lanc
et, 393
, 1150-1163.
52 | ACLP
167. Weaver, M. S., Heinze, K. E., Bell, C. J., Wiener, L., Garee, A. M., Kelly, K. P., . . . Hinds, P. S.
(2016). Establishing psychosocial palliative care standards for children and adolescents with cancer and
their families: An integrative review. Palliative Medicine, 30(3), 212-233.
168. Konstantynowicz, J., Marcinowicz, L., Abramowicz, P., & Abramowicz, M. (2016). What do children
with chronic diseases and their parents think about pediatricians? A qualitative interview study. Maternal
and Child Health Journal, 20, 1745-1752.
169. Smith, L. E., Maybach, A. M., Feldman, A., Darling, A., Akard, T. F., & Gilmer, M. J. (2019). Parent
and child preferences and styles of communication about cancer diagnoses and treatment. Journal of
Pediatric Oncology Nursing. Advance online publication, 1043454219859235.
170. Blazin, L. J., Cecchini, C., Habashy, C., Kaye, E. C., & Baker, J. N. (2018). Communicating
effec
tively in pediatric cancer care: Translating evidence into practice. Children, 5(40), 1-16.
171. Hughes, B., O'Brien, M. R., Flynn, A., & Knighting, K. (2018). The engagement of young people in
their own advance care planning process: A systematic narrative synthesis. Palliative Medicine, 32(7),
1147-1166.
172. Croom, A., Wiebe, D. J., Berg, C. A., Lindsay, R., Donaldson, D., Foster, C., . . . Swinyard, M. T.
(20
11). Adolescent and parent perceptions of patient-centered communication while managing type 1
diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(2), 206-215.
173. Durall, A., Zurakowski, D., & Wolfe, J. (2012). Barriers to conducting advance care discussions for
children with life-threatening conditions. Pediatrics, 129(4), e975-e982.
174. LeBlanc, C. K., Naugler, K., Morrison, K., Parker, J. A., & Chambers, C. T. (2014). Parent
per
ceptions and satisfaction with inpatient child life specialist interventions and the role of child
temperament. Children's Health Care, 43(3), 253-272.
175. Levetown, M., & Committee on Bioethics (2008). Communicating with children and families: From
everyday interactions to skill in conveying distressing information. Pediatrics, 121(5), e1441.
176. Maisels, M. J., & Kring, E. A. (2005). A simple approach to improving patient satisfaction. Clinical
Pediatrics, 44, 797-800.
177. Van Cleave, J., Gortmaker, S. L., & Perrin, J. M. (2010). Dynamics of obesity and chronic health
conditions among children and youth. JAMA, 303(7), 623–630.
178. Asnani, M. R., Quimby, K. R., Bennett, N. R., & Francis, D. K. (2016). Interventions for patients and
caregi
vers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10, CD011175.
179. Pellisé, F., Sell, P., & EuroSpine Patient Line Task Force (2009). Patient information and education
with modern media: The Spine Society of Europe Patient Line. European Spine Journal, 18 (Suppl 3),
395–401.
180. Abualula, N. A., Jacobsen, K. H., Milligan, R. A., Rodan, M.
F., & Conn, V. S. (2016). Evaluating
diabetes educational interventions with a skill development component in adolescents with type 1
diabetes: A systematic review focusing on quality of life. The Diabetes Educator, 42(5), 515-528.
181. Frizzell, C., Connolly, A., Beavis, E., Lawson, J., & Bye, A. (2011). Personalised epilepsy education
intervention for adolescents and impact on knowledge acquisition and psychosocial function. Journal of
Pediatrics and Child Health, 47, 271-275.
182. Hood, K., Iturralde, E., Rausch, J., & Weissberg-Benchell, J. (2018). Preventing diabetes distress in
adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Results 1 year after participation in the STePS program. Diabetes Care,
41, 1623-1630.
183. Cantrell, K., Patel, N., Mandrell, B., & Grissom, S. (2013). Pediatric HIV disclosure: A process-
oriented framework. AIDS Education and Prevention, 25(4), 302-314.
184. Gerson, A. C., Joyner, M., Fosarelli, P., Butz, A., Wissow, L., Lee, S., . . . Hutton, N. (2001).
Disclosure of HIV diagnosis to children: When, where, why, and how. Journal of Pediatric Health Care,
15, 161-167.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 53
185. G
riffin, A., Gilleland, J., Johnson, A., Cummings, L., New, T., Brailey, T., . . . Osunkwo, I. (2013).
Appl
ying a developmental
-ecolo
gical framework to sickle cell dis
ease t
ransition.
Clini
cal Practice in
Pedi
atric Psychology, 1
(3), 25
0
-263.
186. K
ossoff, E. H., Sutter, L., Doerrer, S. C., Haney, C. A., & Turner, Z. (2017). Impact of child life
servi
ces in children and families admitted to start the ketogenic diet.
Journal
of Child Neurology, 32
(9),
828-833.
187. S
tarnes, C., Bailey, E., Calvert, C., Gusler, J., Gisler, S., Williams, F., . . . Cairns, B. (2016).
Develo
pment of a pediatric educational tool: Helping burns heal . . . An adventure for kids with burns.
Journal
of Pediatric Surgical Nursing, 5
(2), 50-59.
188. G
unter, M., & Duke, G. (2018). Reducing uncertainty in families with childhood cancers: An
integrati
ve literature review.
Pedi
atric Nursing, 44
(1), 21-37.
189. La
ndier, W., Ahern, J., Barakat, L. P., Bh
atia, S
., Bingen, K. M., Bondurant, P. G., . . . Hockenberry,
M. (20
16). Patient / family education for newly diagnosed pediatric oncology patients: Consensus
recom
mendations from a children's oncology group expert panel.
Jour
nal of Pediatric Oncology Nurs
ing,
33(6), 422-431.
190. Rod
gers, C. C., Laing, C. M., Herring, R. A., Tena, N., Leonardelli, A., Hockenberry, M., &
Hendri
cks
-Ferguson
, V. (2016). Understanding effective delivery of patient and family education in
pedi
atric oncology: A systematic revie
w from t
he children's oncology group.
Jour
nal of Pediatric Oncology
Nursi
ng, 33
(6), 43
2
-446.
191. Uten
s, E. M., Callus, E., Levert, E. M., De Groote, K., & Casey, F. (2018). Multidisciplinary family
-
centered
psychosocial care for patients with CHD: Consen
sus r
ecommendations from the AEPC
Psy
chosocial Working Group.
Cardiol
ogy in the Young, 28,
192-198.
192. Me
nrath, I., Ernst, G., Mönkemöller, K., Lehmann, C., Eberding, A., Müller
-Godeff
roy, E., . . . &
ModuS
Study group (2018). How are effects of patient
educat
ion programs influenced by psychosocial
ris
k factors in pediatrics?
Kli
nische Pädiatrie, 230
(2), 73-80.
193. B
oyd, M., Lasserson, T. J., McKean, M. C., Gibson, P. G., Ducharme, F. M., & Haby, M. (2009).
Interven
tions for educating children who are
at ri
sk of asthma
-relate
d emergency department attendance.
Cochrane Dat
abase of Systematic Reviews, 2,
CD00129
0.
194. S
rof, B., Taboas, P., & Velsor
-Fri
edrich, B. (2012). Adolescent asthma education programs for
teens: R
eview and summary. Journal of Pedia
tric
Health Care, 26(6), 418
-426.
195. W
atson, W. T., Gillespie, C., Thomas, N., Filuk, S. E., McColm, J., Piwiniuk, M. P., & Becker, A. B.
(2009
). Small
-group, i
nteractive education and the effect on asthma control by children and their families.
Canadian Medi
cal Association Journal, 181
(5), 25
7
-263.
196. K
udubes, A., Bektas, M., & Mutafoglu, K. (2018). The effect of fatigue
-rela
ted education on pediatric
oncol
ogy patients' fatigue and quality of life.
Journa
l of Cancer Education.
197. P
eterson
-Swee
ney,
K., M
cMullen, A., Yoos, H., Kitzmann, H., Halterman, J., Arcoleo, K., & Anson,
E. (2007
). Impact of asthma education received from health care providers on parental illness
repr
esentation in childhood asthma.
Researc
h in Nursing & Health, 30,
203-212.
198. W
u, Y. P., & Roberts, M. C. (2008). A meta
-anal
ysis of interventions to increase adherence to
medi
cation regimens for pediatric otitis media and streptococcal pharyngitis.
Jour
nal of Pediatric
Psy
chology
, 33(7), 78
9
–796.
199. Mc
Grady, M. E., & Hommel, K. A. (2013). Medication adherence and health care utilization in
pedi
atric chronic illness: A systematic review.
Pedi
atrics
, 132(4), 730–740.
200. Lo
iselle, K. A., Gutierrez
-Colina, A.
M., Eaton, C. K., Simons, L. E., Devine, K. A., Mee, L. L., &
Blo
unt, R. L. (2015). Longitudinal stability of medication adherence among adolescent solid organ
trans
plant recipients.
Pedi
atric Transplantation
, 19, 428–435.
201. Coy
ne, K. D., Trimble,
K. A
., Lloyd, A., Petrando, L., Pentz, J., & Fawcett, A. (2019). Interventions to
promote or
al medication adherence in the pediatric chronic illness population: A systematic review from
the ch
ildren’s oncology group.
Jour
nal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
, 36(3), 21
9
–235.
54 | ACLP
202. Hood, K. K., Rohan, J. M., Peterson, C. M., & Drotar, D. (2010). Interventions with adherence-
promoting components in pediatric type 1 diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control.
Diabetes Care, 33(7), 1658–1664.
203. Garvie, P. A., Lensing, S., & Rai, S. N. (2007). Efficacy of a pill-s
wallowing training intervention to
improve antiretroviral medication adherence in pediatric patients with HIV/AIDS. Pediatrics, 119(4), e893–
e899.
204. Patel, A., Jacobsen, L., Jhaveri, R., & Bradford, K. K. (2015). Effectiveness of pediatric pill
swallowing interventions: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 135(5), 883–889.
205. Graham, S., Weinman, J., & Auyeung, V. (2018). Identifying potentially modifiable factors associated
with treatment non-adherence in paediatric growth hormone deficiency: A systematic review. Hormone
Research in Paediatrics, 90, 221–227.
206. Gutierrez-Colina, A. M., Smith, A. W., Mara, C. A., & Modi, A. C. (2018). Adherence barriers in
pediatric epilepsy: From toddlers to young adults. Epilepsy & Behavior, 80, 229–234.
207. Michaud, P.-A., Suris, J.-C., Thomas, R., Gnehm, H. E., Chesaux, J.-J. (2010). Coping with an HIV
infection: A multicenter qualitative survey on HIV positive adolescents’ perceptions of their disease,
therapeutic adherence and treatment. Swiss Medical Weekly, 140(17–18), 247253.
208. Lowenstein, D., Cervenka, M., Mitchell, L., Stewart, N., Kossoff, E., & Kelley, S. (2018). Child life
services in an epilepsy monitoring unit. Clinical Pediatrics, 57(11), 1269-1274.
209. Foster, K., Young, A., Mitchell, R., Van, C., & Curtis, K. (2017). Experiences and needs of parents of
c
ritically injured children during the acute hospital phase: a qualitative investigation. Injury, 48(1), 114-
120.
210. Hall, E. O. (2005). Being in an alien world: Danish parents’ lived experiences when a newborn or
small child is critically ill. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(3), 179-185.
211. Power, N., & Franck, L. (2008). Parent participation in the care of hospitalized children: a systematic
review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(6), 622-641.
212. Rennick, J. E., Johnston, C. C., Dougherty G., Platt, R, & Ritchie, J. A. (2002). Children’s
ps
ychological responses after critical illness and exposure to invasive technology. Journal of
Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 23(3), 133-144.
213. Cousino, M., & Hazen, R. (2013). Parenting stress among caregivers of children with chronic illness:
A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38(8), 809-828.
214. Angstrom-Branstrom, C., Lindh, V., Mullaney, T., Wickart-J
ohansson, G., Svard, A., Nyholm, T., . . .
Engvall, G. (2018). Parents’ experiences and responses to an intervention for psychological preparation
of children and families during the child’s radiotherapy. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 35(2), 132-
148.
215. Burns-Nader, S., Hernandez-Reif, M., & Porter, M. (2014). The relationship between mothers’
coping patterns and children’s anxiety about their hospitalization as reflected in their drawing.
Journal of Child Health Care, 18(1), 6-18.
216. So, S., Rogers, A., Patterson, C., Drew, W., Maxwell.,J., Darch, J., Hoyle, C., Patterson, S., &
Pollack-BarZiv, S. (2014). Parental experiences of a developmentally focused care program for infants
and children during prolonged hospitalization. Journal of Child Health Care, 18(2), p. 156-167
217. Cypress, B. (2012). Family presence on rounds: A systematic review of literature. Dimensions of
Critical Care Nursing, 31(1), 53-64.
218. Kuo, D., Sisterhen, L., Sigrest, T., Biazo, J., Aitken, M., & Smith, C. (2012). Family experiences and
pe
diatric health services use associated with family centered rounds. Pediatrics, 130(2), 299-305.
219. Tyson, M., Bohl, D., & Blickman, J. (2014). A randomized controlled trial: Child life services in
pe
diatric imaging. Pediatric Radiology, 44, 1426-1432.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 55
220. Cheng,
L., Wang, L., He, M., Feng, S., Zhu, Y., & Rodgers, C. (2018). Pers
pectives
of children,
family c
aregivers, and health professionals about pediatric oncology symptoms: A systematic review.
Supporti
ve Care in Cancer,
26(9), 1-15.
221. Lerr
et, S. (2009). Discharge readiness: An integrative review focusing on discharge follo
wing
pediatric
hospitalization.
Journal for S
pecialists in Pediatric Nursing, 14
(4), 245-255.
222. Instit
ute of Medicine (2004).
Health li
teracy: A prescription to end confusion
. Washi
ngton, DC: The
National
Academies Press.
223. United
States Department
of Educa
tion National Center for Education Statistics (2019).
Data point:
Adult l
iteracy in the United States
[Data file]
. Retrieved from
https://nces
.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019179.pdf
224. DeWal
t, D.A.
& Hink,
A. (2009). Health literacy and child health outcomes: A systematic review of
the lit
erature.
Pediatric
s, 124
(Suppl.
3), S265
-274
225. Dries
snack, M., Chung, S., Perkhounkova
, E., & Hein
, M. (2014). Using the "newest vital sign" to
assess he
alth literacy in children.
Journal
of Pediatric Health Care, 28
(2), 165-171.
226. Flea
ry, S. A., Joseph, P., & Pappagianopoulos, J. E. (2018). Adolescent health literacy and health
behaviors: A sys
tematic review.
Journal of
Adolescence, 62
, 116-127.
227. Bigg
s, J. M., Glasgow, N. E., Pradel, F., & Morgan, J. A. (2018). Assessing the understanding of
pediatric-oriented
medication education materials versus standard available education materia
ls. The
Journal
of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 23
(5), 362-365.
228. Nabors, L
., Bush, A., Buchanan, R., Clarke, J., & Campbell, A. (2011). Preschoolers' knowledge
about hosp
ital and emergency equipment and care.
Issues i
n Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 34
, 131-
143.
229. Looka
baugh, S., & Ballard, S. (2018). The scop
e and futur
e direction of child life.
Journal
of Child
and Family
Studies, 27,
1721-1731.
230. Blai
ne, K., Rogers, J., O'Neill, M. R., McBride, S., Faerber, J., Feudtner, C, & Berry, J. G. (2018).
Clinici
an perceptions of the importance of hospital discha
rge comp
onents for children.
Journal
for
Healthcare Qual
ity, 40
(2), 79-88.
231. Haugen,
M. S., Landier, W., Mandrell, B. N., Sullivan, J., Schwartz, C., Skeens, M. A., &
Hockenber
ry, M. (2016). Educating families of children newly diagnosed with cancer: In
sights of
a Delphi
panel of e
xpert clinicians from the Children's Oncology Group.
Journal
of Pediatric Oncology Nursing,
33(6), 405-413
232. Smi
th, J. G., Desai, P. P., Sira, N., & Engelke, S. C. (2014). Family
-centered de
velopmentally
supporti
ve care in
the neonata
l intensive care unit: Exploring the role and training of child life specialists.
Children’s
Health Care, 43
(4), 345-368.
233. Vepras
kas, S. H., O'Day, P., Zhang, L., Simpson, P., & Gage, S. (2018). Parents support teach
-
back, dem
onstration, and
a postdi
scharge phone call to augment discharge education.
Hospital
Pediatri
cs, 8
(12), 778-784.
234. Schwe
itzer, M., Aucoin, J., Docherty, S. L., Rice, H. E., Thompson, J., & Taylor
-Sulliv
an, D. (2014).
Evaluati
on of a discharge education protocol for ped
iatric
patients with gastrostomy tubes.
Journal
of
Pediatri
c Health Care, 28
(5), 420-428.
235. Wei
ss, M. E., Sawin, K. J., Gralton, K., Johnson, N., Klingbell, C., Lerret, S., . . . Schiffman, R.
(2017). D
ischarge teaching, readiness for discharge, and pos
t-dischar
ge outcomes in parents of
hospital
ized children.
Journal o
f Pediatric Nursing, 34,
58-64.
236. Wil
son
-Smith, M.
G., Sachse, K., & Perry, M. T. (2018). Road to home program: A performance
improve
ment initiative to increase family and nurse satisfa
ction wi
th the discharge education process for
newly di
agnosed pediatric oncology patients.
Journal
of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 35
(5), 368-374.
237. Kul
aylat, A. N., Rocourt, D. V., Tsai, A. Y., Martin, K. L., Engbrecht, B. W., Santos, M. C., . . . Dill
on,
P. W. (2018
). Understanding readmissions in children undergoing surgery: A pediatric NSQIP analysis.
Journal
of Pediatric Surgery, 53
(7), 1280-1287.
56 | ACLP
238. Parikh, K., Hall, M., Kenyon, C. C., Teufel II, R. J., Mussman, G. M., Montalbano, A., . . . & Morse, R.
B. (2018). Impact of discharge components on readmission rates for children hospitalized with asthma.
The Journal of Pediatrics, 195, 175-181.
239. Heiser Rosenberg, C. E., Terhaar, M. F., Ascenzi, J. A., Walbert, A., Kokoszka, M., Perretta, J. S., &
Miller, M. R. (2017). Becoming parent and nurse: High-fidelity simulation in teaching ambulatory central
line infection prevention to parents of children with cancer. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and
Patient Safety, 43(5), 251-258.
240. Nakamura, M. M., Toomey, S. L., Zaslavsky, A. M., Berry, J. G., Lorch, S. A., Jha, A. K., . . . &
Schuster, M. A. (2014). Measuring pediatric hospital readmission rates to drive quality improvement.
Academic Pediatrics, 14(5), S39-S46.
241. Auger, K. A., Teufel, R. J., Harris, J. M., Gay, J. C., Del Beccaro, M. A., Neuman, M. I., . . . & Simon,
H. K. (2017). Children’s hospital characteristics and readmission metrics. Pediatrics, 139(2), e20161720.
242. Friedman, A. J., Cosby, R., Boyko, S., Hatton-Bauer, J., & Turnbull, G. (2011). Effective teaching
strategies and methods of delivery for patient education: A systematic review and practice guideline
recommendations. Journal of Cancer Education, 26(1), 12-21.
243. Badaczewski, A., Bauman, L. J., Blank, A. E., Dreyer, B., Abrams, M. A., Stein, R. E. K., . . . Sharif, I.
(2017). Relationship between teach-back and patient-centered communication in primary care pediatric
encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 100, 1345-1352.
244. Klingbeil, C., & Gibson, C. (2018). The teach back project: A system-wide evidence based practice
implementation. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 42, 81-85.
245. Kaddoura, M., Cormier, K., & Leduc, J. (2013). Resource collaboration: The benefits of utilizing child
life specialists when dealing with pediatric stress. Educational Research Quarterly, 37(2), 3-21.
246. Zoucha, J., Hull, M., Keniston, A., Mastalerz, K., Quinn, R., Tsai, A., . . . Burden, M. (2018). Barriers
to early hospital discharge: A cross-sectional study at five academic hospitals. Journal of Hospital
Medicine,13(12), 816-822.
247. Turner, T., Cull, W. L., Bayldon, B., Klass, P., Sanders, L. M., Frintner, M. P., . . . Dreyer, B. (2009).
Pediatricians and health literacy: Descriptive results from a national survey. Pediatrics, 124(3), S299-S305.
248. Al-Yateem, N. S., Issa, W. B., & Rossiter, R. (2015). Childhood stress in healthcare settings:
Awareness and suggested interventions. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatrics Nursing, 38(2), 36-153.
249. Butler, S. C., Huyler, K., Kaza, A., & Rachwal, C. (2017). Filling a significant gap in the cardiac ICU:
implementation of individualised developmental care. Cardiology in the Young, 27(9), 1797-1806.
250. Lerwick, J. L. (2013). Psychosocial implications of pediatric surgical hospitalization. Seminars in
Pediatric Surgery, 22, 129-133.
251. Peterson, J. K., & Evangelista, L. S. (2017). Developmentally supportive care in congenital heart
disease: A concept analysis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 36, 241-247.
252. Aley, K. E. (2002). Developmental approach to pediatric transplantation. Progress in Transplantation,
12(2), 86-91.
253. Brynes, N., Lee, H., Ren, D., & Beach, M. (2017). Improvement of Patient-and Family-Specific Care
for Children with Special Behavioral Needs in the Emergency Setting: A Behavioral Needs Education.
Journal of Emergency Nursing, 43(3), 202-207.
254. Jensen, E. J., Geisthardt, C., & Sarigiani, P. A. (2019). Working with children with autism spectrum
disorder in a medical setting: Insights from Certified Child Life Specialists. Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorders, 1-10.
255. Johnson, N. L., & Rodriguez, D. (2013). Children with autism spectrum disorder at a pediatric
hospital: A systematic review of the literature. Pediatric Nursing, 39(3), 131-141.
256. Action for Sick Children - National Association for the Welfare of Children in Hospital. (2013). Action
for Sick Children- National Association for the Welfare of Children in Hospital Recommendations (Vol.
2029339). UK. Retrieved from
http://www.actionforsickchildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/RECOMMENDATIONS-18-6-13.pdf.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 57
257. Desai, P. P., Ng, J. B., & Bryant, S. G. (2002). Care of children and families in the CICU: A focus on their
developmental, psychosocial, and spiritual
needs. Critical Care Nursing, 23(3), 88-97.
258. Turner, J. C., & Fralic, J. (2009). Making explicit the implicit: Child life specialists talk about their
assessment process. Child
Youth Care Forum, 38, 39-54.
259. Als, H., & McAnulty, G. B. (2011). The Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment
Program (NIDCAP) with Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC): Comprehensive care for preterm infants. Current
Women’s Health Reviews, 7(3), 288-301.
260. Lambert, V., Coad, J., Hicks, P., & Glacken, M. (2014). Social spaces for young children in hospital.
Child:
Care, Health, and Development, 40(2), 195-204.
261. Bjork, M., Nordstrom, B., & Hallstrom, I. (2006). Needs of young children with cancer during their initial
hospitalization: An observational study. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 23(4), 210-219.
262. Haiat, H., Bar-Mor, G., & Shochat, M. (2003). The world of the child: A world of play even in the
hospital.
International Pediatric Nursing, 18
(3), 209-214.
263. Zahr, L. (1998). Therapeutic play for hospitalized preschoolers in Lebanon. Pediatric Nursing, 24(5),
449-4
54.
264. Oremland, E. K. (2000). The pediatric playroom: a multiple play partners environment. In J. D. Oremland
(Ed.), Protecting the emotional development of the ill child: The essence of the child life profession (pp.
17-32).
Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.
265. Weber, F.S. (2010). The influence of playful activities on children's anxiety during the preoperative period at
the outpatient surgical center. Jornal de Pediatria, 86(3), 209-214.
266. Koukourikos, K. Tzeha, L., Pantelidou, P., & Tsaloglidou, A. (2015). The importance of play during
hospitalization of children. Materia Socio-Medica, 27(6), 438-441.
267. Vilas, D. (2014). Report on findings of play practices and innovations survey: The state of play in North
American hospitals. Arlington, VA: Child Life Council. Retrieved from
http://www.childlife.org/docs/default-source/resources/resource-
library/the_state_of_play_in_north_american_hospitals.pdf?sfvrsn=2
268. Almqvist, L., Hellnas, P., Stefansson, M., Granlund, M. (2006). I can play! Young children's perception of
health. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9(3), 275-284.
269. Campos, M., Rodrigues, K., & Pinto, M. (2009). Evaluation of the behavior of the preschool one just
admitted in the unit of pediatrics and the use of the therapeutic toy. Einstein (São Paulo), 8(1), 10-17.
270. Nijhof, S. L., Vinkers, C. H., van Geelen, S. M., Duijff, S. N., Achterberg, E. M., van der Net, J., . . . van der
Brug, A. W. (2018). Healthy play, better coping: The importance of play for the development of children in health
and disease. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 95, 421-429.
271. Cox, E. (2017, November 8). The power of play in children’s health. U.S. News and World Report.
Retrieved from https://health.usnews.com/health-care/for-better/articles/2017-11-08/the-power-of-play-in-
childrens-health
272. McCue, K. (1988). Medical play: An expanded perspective. Children's Health Care, 16(3), 75-85.
273. Bolig, R. (2018). Play in children’s health-care settings. In J. A. Rollins, R. Bolig, & C. C. Mahan
(Eds.), Meeting children’s psychosocial needs across the health-care continuum (pp. 77-117). Austin, TX: Pro-
Ed.
274. Jones, M. (2018). The necessity of play for children in health care. Pediatric Nursing, 44(6), 303-305.
275. Davis, M., & Burns-Nader, S. (2017). Examining differences in affect displayed during non-medical pretend
play and medical pretend play. Early Child Development and Care, 189(10), 1657-1665.
276. Dionigi, A. (2017). Clowning as a complementary approach for reducing iatrogenic effects in pediatrics.
AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(8), 775-782.
277. Koller, D., & Gryski, C. (2007). The life threatened child and the life enhancing clown: Towards a model of
therapeutic clowning. eCAM, 5(1), 17-25.
58 | ACLP
278. McCullough, A., Ruehrdanz, A., Jenkins, M., Gilmer, M. J., Olson, J., Pawar, A., . . . O’Haire, M.
(2018). Measuring the effects of an animal-assisted intervention for pediatric oncology patients and their
parents: A multisite randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 35(3), 159-177.
279. Boles, J., Winsor, D., Mandrell, B., Gattuso, J., West, N., Leigh, L., & Grissom, S. (2017).
Student/patient: The school perceptions of children with cancer. Educational Studies, 43(5), 549-566.
280. Rodriguez, E., Dunn, M., Zuckerman, T., Vannatta, K., Gerhardt, C. & Compas, B. (2012). Cancer-
relate
d sources of stress for children with cancer and their parents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology,
37(2). 185-197.
281. Boles, J. (2017). School attendance for children with chronic illnesses. Pediatric Nursing, 43(6), 305-
306.
282. Shiu, S. (2001). Issues in the education of students with chronic illness. International Journal of
Disability, Development and Education, 48(3), 269-281.
283. Burns, S., Hernandez-Reif, M., & Jessee, P. (2008). A review of pediatric HIV effects on
neurocognitive development. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 31(3), 107-121.
284. Compas, B., Jaser, S., Reeslund, K., Patel, N., & Yarboi, J. (2017). Neurocognitive deficits in
children with chronic health conditions. American Psychological Association, 72(4), 326-338.
285. Shaw, S., & McCabe, P. (2008). Hospital-to-school transition for children with chronic illness:
Meeting the new challenges of an evolving health care system. Psychology in the Schools, 45(1), 74-87.
286. Thies, K. M. (1999). Identifying the educational implications of chronic illness in school children.
Journal of School Health, 69(10), 392-397.
287. Irwin, M., Elam, M., & Merianos, A. (2015). Coordination of care between health and education
systems for patients with a hematologic or oncologic diagnosis: A time study analysis. Jour
nal of Pediatric
Nursing, 20, 244-253.
288. Schilling, E., & Getch, Y. (2017). School reentry services for students with chronic health conditions:
An examination of regional practices. Psychology in the Schools, 55, 1027-1040.
289. Thompson, A., Christiansen, H., Elam, M., Hoag, H., Irwin, M., Pao, M., . . . Kelly, K. (2015).
Academic continuity and school reentry support as a standard of care in pediatric
oncology. Pediatric
Blood Cancer, 62, S805-S817.
290. Worchel-Prevatt, F., Heffer, R., Prevatt, B., Miner, J., Young-Saleme, T., Horgan, D., . . . Frankel, L.
(1998). A school reentry program for chronically ill children. Journal of School Psychology, 36(3), 261-
279.
291. Weiner, P., Hoffman, M., & Rosen, C. (2018). Child life and education issues: The child with a
chronic illness or special healthcare needs. In R. H. Thompson (Ed.), The
handbook of child life: A guide
for pediatric psychosocial care (pp. 527-549). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
292. Michael, A. I., Ademola, S. A., Olawoye, O. A., Iyun, A. O., Arowojolu, O., & Oluwatosin, O. M.
(2019, in press). Time to return to school in child and adolescent burn patients from a sub-Saharan
tertiary hospital. Burns.
293. National Research Council (2015). Investing in the health and well-being of young adults.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available from http://nap.edu/18869
294. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine (2017). Young adult health and well-being: A
position statement of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Journal of Adolescent Medicine,
60, 758-759,
295. Spencer, D.L., McManus, M., Call, K.T., Turner, J., Harwood, C., White, P., & Alarcon, G. (2018).
Health care coverage and access among children, adolescents, and young adults, 2010-2016:
Implications for future health reforms. Journal of Adolescent Medicine, 62, 667-673.
296. Dwyer-Matzky, K., Blatt, A., Asselin, B. L., & Wood, D. L. (2017). Lack of preparedness for pediatric
to adult-oriented health care transition in hospitalized adolescents and young adults. Academic
Pediatrics, 18(1), 102-110.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 59
297. Fenton,
N., Ferris, M., Ko, Z., Javalkar, K., & Hooper, S. R. (2015). The relationship of health care
transition
readiness to disease
-related cha
racteristics, psychosocial factors, and health care outcomes:
Prelimi
nary findin
gs in adol
escents with chronic kidney disease.
Journal
of Pediatric Rehabilitation
Medicin
e, 8
, 13-22.
298. Gray,
W. N., Schaefer, M. R., Resmini
-Rawlinson, A
., & Wagoner, S. T. (2018). Barriers to transition
from pediatri
c to adult care: A systematic revi
ew. Journal o
f Pediatric Psychology, 43
(5), 488-502.
299. Shepard
, C. L., Doerge, E. J., Eickmeyer, A. B., Kraft, K. H., Wan, J., & Stoffel, J. T. (2018).
Ambulatory
care use among patients with spina bifida: Change in care from childhood to adulthood.
The
Journal
of Urology, 199
, 1050-1055.
300. Campbel
l, F., Biggs, K., Aldiss, S. K., O'Neill, P. M., Clowes, M., McDonagh, J., . . . Gibson, F.
(2016). Tra
nsition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.
Cochrane
Database of Systematic
Reviews, 4
, 1-67.
301. Bowen,
M. E., Henske, J. A., & Potter, A. (2010). Health care transitions in adolescents and young
adults wit
h diabetes.
Clinical
Diabetes, 28
(3), 99-106.
302. Goralsk
i, J. L., Nasr, S. Z., & Uluer, A. (2017). Overcoming b
arriers to a s
uccessful transition from
pediatric t
o adult care.
Pediatric P
ulmonology, 52
, S52-S60.
303. National
Child Traumatic Stress Network. (2003, September).
Definition
of medical traumatic stress
.
Paper presented
at the Medical Traumatic Stress W
orking Grou
p meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
304. Ari,
A., Peri, T., Margalit, D., Galili
-Weisstub
, E., Udassin, R., & Benarroch, F. (2018). Surgical
procedures and
pediatric medical traumatic stress (PMTS) syndrome: Assessment and future directions.
Journal
of
Pediatric
Surgery, 53
, 1526-1531.
305. Bonan
no, G., & Mancini, A. (2008). The human capacity to thrive in the face of potential trauma.
Pediatric
s, 121
(2), 369-375.
306. Boles
, J. (2017). Trauma
-informed care: A
n intentional approach.
Pediatri
c Nursing,
43(5), 250-253.
307. Clinton,
J., Feller, A. F., & Williams, R. C. (2016). The importance of infant mental health.
Paediatric
Child Health,
21
(5), 239-241.
308. Lawles
s, A., Conveney
, J., & MacDouga
ll, C. (2013). Infant mental health promotion and the
discours
e of risk.
Sociology
of Health & Illness, 36
(3), 416-431.
309. Marcel
lus, S., & Cross, S. (2016). Trauma
-informed care
in the NICU: Implications for early
childhoo
d development.
Neonatal Netwo
rk, 35
(6), 359-366.
310. Sampa
io, A., & Lifter, K. (2014). Neurosciences of infant mental health development: Recent
findings an
d implications for counseling psychology.
Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 61
(4), 513-520.
311. Simps
on, T., Cond
on, E., P
rice, R., Finsh, B. K., Sdler, L. S., & Ordway, M. R. (2015). Demystifying
infant ment
al health: What the primary care provider needs to know.
Journal of
Pediatric Health Care,
30(1), 38-48.
312. Tomli
n, A. M., Deloian, B., & Wollesen
, L. (2016)
. Infant/early childhood mental health and
collabor
ative partnerships: Beyond the NICU.
Newborn & Infant
Nursing Reviews, 16
(4), 309-315.
313. Wheel
er, R., Ludtke, M., Helmer, J., Barna, N., Wilson, K., & Oleksiak, C. (2013). Implementation of
the PICCOLO
in infant mental health practice: A case study.
Infant Mental
Health Journal, 34
(4), 352-358.
314. Weathers
ton, D. (2017). Reflecting on the practice of infant mental health and the reduction of risk in
infancy and
early parenthood: A case study
. Infant Mental
Health Journal, 38
(1), 143-149.
315. Fernandez
Medina, I. M., Granero
-Molina, J., F
ernandez
-Sola, C., He
rnandez
-Padilla,
J. M., Avila,
M. C., & Lopez
Rodriguez, M. (2018). Bonding in neonatal intensive care units: Experiences of extremely
preterm inf
ants' mothers.
Women and Bi
rth, 31
, 325-330.
316. Makel
a, H., Axelin, A., Feeley, N., & Niela
-Vilen, H. (
2018). Clinging to closeness: The parental view
on developi
ng a close bond with their infants in the NICU.
Midwifery, 62, 183-188.
317. Guillaume, S., Mi
chelin, N., Amrani, E., Benier, B., Durrmeyer, X., Lescure, S., . . . Caeymaex, L.
(2013). P
arents’ expectations of staff in the early bonding process with their premature babies in the
intensive c
are setting: A qualitative multicenter study wi
th 60 parents. Pediatri
cs, 13
(1), 18.
60 | ACLP
318. Duhn, L. (2010). The importance of touch in the development of attachment. Advances in Neonatal
Care, 10(6), 294-300.
319. Reda, N. M., & Hartshorne, T. S. (2008). Attachment, bonding, and parental stress in CHARGE
syndrome. Mental Health Aspects of Developmental Disabilities, 11(1), 10-21.
320. Pennestri, M., Gaudreau, H., Bouvette-Turcot, A., Moss, E., Lecompte, V., Atkinson, L., . . . Meaney,
M. J. (2015). Attachment disorganization among children in neonatal intensive care unit: Preliminary
results. Early Human Development, 91, 601-606.
321. Bialoskurski, M., Cox, C. L., & Hayes, J. A. (1999). The nature of attachment in a neonatal intensive
care unit. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 13(1), 66-77.
322. Schuengel, C., De Schipper, J. C., Sterkenburg, P. S., & Kef, S. (2013). Attachment, intellectual
disabilities and mental health: Research, assessment and intervention. Journal of Applied Research in
Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 34-46.
323. Boztepe, H., Ay, A., Yildiz, G. K., & Cinar, S. (2016). Does the visibility of a congenital anomaly
affect maternal-infant attachment levels? Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 21, 200-211.
324. Fleckman, J. F., Kuint, J., & Eidelman, A. I. (1999). The nature of the mother's tie to her infant:
Maternal bonding under conditions of proximity, separation, and potential loss. Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 40(6), 929-939.
325. Nonnenmacher, N., Noe, D., Ehrenthal, J. C., Reck, C. (2016). Postpartum bonding: The impact of
maternal depression and adult attachment style. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 19(5), 927-935.
326. Davies, K. A., Macfarlane, G. J., McBeth, J., Morriss, R., & Dickens, C. (2009). Insecure attachment
style is associated with chronic widespread pain. Pain, 343, 200-205.
327. Puig, J., Englund, M. M., Simpson, J. A., & Collins, W. A. (2013). Predicting adult physical illness
from infant attachment: A prospective longitudinal study. Health Psychology, 32(4), 409-417.
328. McWilliams, L. A., & Bailey, S. J. (2010). Associations between adult attachment ratings and health
concerns: Evidence from the national comorbidity survey replication. Health Psychology, 29(4), 446-453.
329. Coughlin, M. E. (2017). Trauma-informed care in the NICU: Evidence-based practice guidelines for
neonatal clinicians. New York, NY: Spring Publishing Company.
330. Ferro, M. A. (2016). Major depressive disorder, suicidal behaviour, bipolar disorder, and generalised
anxiety disorder among emerging adults with and without chronic health conditions. Epidemiology and
Psychiatric Sciences, 25(5), 462-474.
331. Ferro, M. A., & Boyle, M. H. (2015). The impact of chronic physical illness, maternal depressive
symptoms, family functioning, and self-esteem on symptoms of anxiety and depression in children.
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 177-187.
332. Whitney, D. G., & Peterson, M. D. (2019). US national and state-level prevalence of mental health
disorders and disparities of mental health care use in children. JAMA pediatrics, 173(4), 389-391.
333. Burstein, B., Agostino, H., & Greenfield, B. (2019). Suicidal attempts and ideation among children
and adolescents in US emergency departments, 2007-2015. JAMA pediatrics, 173(6), 598-600.
334. Curtis, C. E., & Luby, J. L. (2008). Depression and social functioning in preschool children with
chronic medical conditions. The Journal of Pediatrics, 153(3), 408-413.
335. Immelt, S. (2006). Psychological adjustment in young children with chronic medical conditions.
Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 21(5), 362-377.
336. Merikangas, K. R., Calkins, M. E., Burstein, M., He, J. P., Chiavacci, R., Lateef, T., . . . Gur, R. E.
(2015). Comorbidity of physical and mental disorders in the neurodevelopmental genomics cohort study.
Pediatrics, 135(4), e927.
337. Vessey, J. A. (1999). Psychological comorbidity in children with chronic conditions. Pediatric
Nursing, 25(2), 211
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 61
338. Barlow, J.
H., & Ellard, D. R. (2006). The psychosocial well
-being of chi
ldren with chronic disease,
their parents and sibl
ings: An overview of the research evidence base.
Child: Care,
Health and
Development, 32(1), 19-31.
339. Butler, A
., Van Lieshout, R. J., Lipman, E. L., MacMillan, H. L., Gonzalez, A., Gorter, J. W., . . .
Ferro, M. A. (201
8). Mental disorder i
n children wit
h physical conditions: A pilot study.
BMJ Open, 8(1),
e019011.
340. Leeman, J
., Crandell, J., Lee, A., Bai, J., Sandelowski, M., & Knafl, K. (2016). Family functioning and
the wellbeing of ch
ildren with chronic conditions: A meta
-analysis
.
Research in Nur
sing & Health, 39
(4),
229-243.
341. Butwick
a, A., Frisén, L., Almqvist, C., Zethelius
, B., & Lichten
stein, P. (2015). Risks of psychiatric
disorders and s
uicide attempts in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A population
-based
cohort study. Diabetes Car
e, 38
(3), 453-459.
342. Butwicka, A
., Olén, O., Larsson, H., Halfvarson, J.
, Almqvist, C.,
Lichtenstein, P., Serlachius, E.,
Frisen, L.
, & Ludvigsson, J. F. (2019). Association of childhood
-onset inflamma
tory bowel disease with
risk of psy
chiatric disorders and suicide attempt.
JAMA pediatri
cs
, 173(10), 969-978.
343. Christians
en, E., & Stenager, E. (2012). Risk for attempted suicide in children and youths after
contact with s
omatic hospitals: a Danish register based nested case
–control study. Journal of
Epidemiolo
gical Community Health
, 66(3), 247-253.
344. Eblin,
A.
(2019). Redu
cing seclusion and restraints on the inpatient child and adolescent behavioral
health unit: A
quality improvement study.
Journal of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 32,
122-
128.
345. Ferro, M. A
., Avison, W. R., Karen Campbell, M., &
Speechley, K
. N. (2011). The impact of maternal
depressive sy
mptoms on health
-related qua
lity of life in children with epilepsy: A prospective study of
family envi
ronment as mediators and moderators.
Epilepsi
a
, 52(2), 316-325.
346. Reaume, S.
V., & Ferro,
M. A. (2019). Chron
icity of mental comorbidity in children with new
-onset
physical
illness.
Child: Care, Hea
lth and Development,
45(4), 559-567.
347. Hornsby, N., Blo
m, L., & Sengoelge, M. (2019, in press). Psychosocial interventions targeting
recovery in child and ad
olescent burns: a systematic review.
Journal of Pe
diatric Psychology
.
348. Bethell
, C., Jones, J., Gombojav, N., Linkenbach, J., & Sege, R. (2019). Positive childhood
experiences
and adult mental and relational health in a statewide sample: ass
ociations ac
ross adverse
childhood e
xperiences levels. JAMA pediatrics, 173(11), e193007
-e193007.
349. Deavin, A., Gr
easley, P., & Dixon, C. (2018). Children's perspectives on living with a sibling with a
chronic illne
ss.
Pediatrics,
142
(2), e2017415
1.
350. Fleary
, S. A., & Heffer, R. W. (2013). Impact of growing up with a chronically ill sibling on well
siblings’
late adolescent functioning.
International S
cholarly Research Notices
- Family Me
dicine, 2013.
351. Nabors, L., Li
ddle, M., Graves, M., Kampha
us, A., & El
kins, J. (2018). A family affair: Supporting
children wi
th chronic illnesses.
Child: Care, Health
, & Development, 45
, 227-233.
352. Alderfer,
M. A., Labay, L. E., & Kazak, A. E. (2003). Brief report: Does posttraumatic stress apply to
siblings of childhood c
ancer survivors?
Journal of
Pediatric Psychology, 28
(4), 281-286.
353. Dolgin, M. J
., Somer, E., Zaidel, N., & Zaizov, R. (1997). A structured group intervention for siblings
of children with
cancer.
Journal o
f Child and Adolescent Group Ther
apy, 7(1), 3-20.
354. Hashemi, F., &
Shokrpour, N. (2010). The impact of education regarding the needs of pediatric
leukemia pa
tients' siblings on the parents' knowledge and practice.
Health Care Mana
ger, 29
(1), 75-79.
355. Roberts, R. M., Ej
ova, A., Gia
llo, R., Stroh
m, K., Lillie, M., & Fuss, B. (2015). A controlled trial of the
SibworkS
group program for siblings of children with special needs.
Research in Devel
opmental
Disabiliti
es, 43
-44, 21-31.
356. Gursky, B
. (2007). The effect of educational interv
entions with s
iblings of hospitalized children.
Journal of
Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 28,
392-398.
62 | ACLP
357. White, T. E., Hendershot, K. A., Dixon, M. D., Pelletier, W., Haight, A., Stegenga, K., . . . Pentz, P. D.
(2017). Family strategies to support siblings of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.
Pediatrics, 139(2), e20161057.
358. Wiener, L., Hoag, J. A., Pelletier, W., Shah, N. N., Shaw, B. E., Pulsipher, M. A., . . . Guilcher, G.
(2019
). Transplant center practices for psychosocial assessment and management of pediatric
hematopoietic stem cell donors. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1. Advance online publication.
359. Sisk, C., Walker, E., Gardner, C., Mandrell, B., & Grissom, S. (2012). Building a legacy for children
and adolescents with chronic disease. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 27, e71-e76.
360. Boles, J. (2014). Creating a legacy for and with hospitalized children. Pediatric Nursing, 40(1), 43-
44.
361. Foster, T., Dietrich, M., Friedman, D., Gordon, J., & Gilmer, M. (2012). Nati
onal survey of children's
hospitals on legacy-making activities. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 15(5), 573-578.
362. Otis-Green, S. (2003). Legacy building. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 73(3), 395-405.
363. Allen, R., Hilgeman, M., Ege, M., Shuster, J., & Burgio, L. (2008). Legacy activities as interventions
approaching end of life. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 11(7), 1029-1038.
364. Foster, T., Gilmer, M., Davies, B., Barrera, M., Fairclough, D., Vannatta, K., & Gerhardt, C. (2009).
Bereaved parents' and siblings’ reports of legacies created by children with cancer. Journal of Pediatric
Oncology Nursing, 26(6), 369-376.
365. Hunter, E. (2008). Beyond death: Inheriting the past and giving to the future, transmitting the legacy
of one's self. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 56(4), 313-329.
366. Snaman, J. M., Kayce, E. C., Torres, C., Gibson, D. V., & Baker, J. N. (2016). Parental grief
following the death of a child from cancer: The ongoing odyssey. Pediatric Blood Cancer, 63, 1594-1602.
367. Kreicbergs, U., Lannen, P., Onelow, E., & Wolfe, J. (2007). Parental grief after losing a child to
cancer: Impact of professional support on long-term outcomes. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25, 3307-
3312.
368. Morris, S., Dole, O., Joselow, M., Duncan, J., Renaud, K., & Branowicki, P. (2016). The development
of a hospital-wide bereavement program: Ensuring bereavement care for all families of pediatric patients.
Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 31(1), 88-95.
369. Suttle, M., Jenkins, T., & Tamburro, R. (2017). End-of-life and bereavement care in pediatric
intensive care units. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 64(5), 1167-1183.
370. Kreicbergs, U., Valdimarsdóttir, U., Onelöv, E., Henter, J. I., & Steineck, G. (2004). Anxiety and
depression in parents 4–9 years after the loss of a child owing to a malignancy: A population-based
follow-up. Psychological medicine, 34(8), 1431-1441.
371. Ljungman, L., Hovén, E., Ljungman, G., Cernvall, M., & vos Essen, L. (2015). Does time heal all
wounds? A longitudinal study of the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms in parents of
survivors of childhood cancer and bereaved parents. Psycho-Oncology, 24, 1792-1798.
372. Stroebe, M., Hansson, R., Stroebe, W., & Schut,
H. (2001). Introduction: Concepts and issues in
contemporary research on bereavement. In M. Stroebe et al. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research
(pp. i-xv). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
373. Li, J., Precht, D., Mortensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2003). Mortality in parents after death of a child in
Denmark: A
nationwide follow-up study. Lancet, 361, 363-367.
374. Espinosa, J., & Evans, W. (2013). Maternal bereavement: The heightened mortality of mothers after
the dea
th of a child. Economics and Human Biology, 11, 371-381.
375. Cleiren, M. (1993). Bereavement and adaptation: A comparative study of the aftermath of death.
Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
376. Sedig, L. K., Spruit, J. L., Paul, T. K., Cousino, M. K., Pituch, K., & Hutchinson, R. (201
9,
forthcoming). Experiences at the end of life from the perspective of bereaved parents: Results of a
qualitative focus group study. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 1-9.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 63
377. Brooten,
D. A., Youngblut, J. M., Roche, R. M., Cai
cedo, C. L., &
Page, T. F. (2018). Surviving
siblings'
illnesses, treatments/health services over 13 months after a sibling's death.
Journal of
Child and
Family St
udies, 27,
2049–2056.
378. Lövgren, M.
, Jalmsell, L., Wallin, A., Steineck, G., &
Kreicber
gs, U. (2016). Siblings' experiences of
their brother's
or sister's cancer death: a nationwide follow
-up 2–9 years later
.
Psycho-Oncology, 25,
435–440.
379. Kobayashi
, M., Heiney, S. P., Osawa, K., Ozawa, M., & Matsushima, E. (2017). Effect of a g
roup
intervention
for children and their parents who have cancer.
Palliative
& Supportive Care, 15
(5), 575-586.
380. McCue, K., & B
onn, R. (2011).
How to help chil
dren through a parent's serious illness: Supportive,
practical adv
ice from a leading child li
fe speciali
st
. New York: St. Martin's
Griffin Press.
381. Crider, J. D.,
& Pate, M. (2011). Helping children say goodbye to loved ones in adult and pediatric
intensive care
units: Certified Child Life Specialist
—critical c
are nurse partnership.
AACN Advanced
Critical Care
, 22
(2), 109-112.
382. Hanley, J.
B., & Piazza, J. (2012). A visit to the intensive care unit: A family
-centered culture c
hange
to facilitate
pediatric visitation in an adult intensive care unit.
Critical C
are Nursing Quarterly, 35
(1), 113-
122.
383. Mori, M.,
Elsayem, A., Reddy, S., Bruera, E., & Fadul, N. (2012). Unrelieved pain and suffering in
patients with
advanced cancer.
American J
ournal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 29
(3), 236-240.
384. Sutter, C., & Reid,
T. (2012). How do we t
alk to the c
hildren? Child life consultation to support the
children of s
eriously ill adult inpatients.
Journal of P
alliative Medicine
, 15(12), 1362-1368.
385. Hicks, M
. (Ed.). (2008).
Child life b
eyond the hospital.
Arlington,
VA: Child Life
Council.
386. Kleinberg
, S. (1987). Child life in the 1990s: Changing roles, changing times.
Children's Health
Care
,
15(4), 240-244.
387. Associ
ation of Child Life Professionals. (2019). ACLP 2019
-2021 strategic
plan. Retrieved from:
https://www.child
life.org/docs/default
-source/abou
t
-aclp/aclp-2019-2021-strategic-plan.pdf
388. Geisse,
J. (2013).
Child life s
pecialists in the camp setting:
An exploration
of presence, roles, and
perspectiv
es
(Unpublis
hed master's thesis). Mills College, Oakland, CA.
389. Glasrud
, P., & Feigal, R. (1984). Child life and children's dentistry: Broadening our scope of concern.
Children's Health
Care
, 12(3), 143-147.
390. Hinze, T. (20
10).
Effectivenes
s of child life intervention on uncooperative pediatric patients in the
dental clin
ic setting
(Unpublis
hed master's thesis). Texas A&M, College Station, TX.
391. Schwartz, B
., & Albino, J. (1983). Effects of psycholo
gical prepar
ation on children hospitalized for
dental procedures
.
The Journa
l of Pediatrics, 102
(4), 634-638.
392. Oldfie
ld, B. J., Nogelo, P. F., Vázquez, M., Ayala, K. O., Fenick, A. M., & Rosenthal, M. S. (2019).
Group Well-Child Care and
Health Service
s Utilizat
ion: A Bilingual Qualitative Analysis of Parents’
Perspectives
. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 1
-7.
393. Palau,
R. (2012).
Integrating and
establishing child life outside of the hospital setting: The role of a
child life
specialist in schools
(Unpublish
ed master's thesis). Mills College, Oakland, CA.
394. Coleman, C. (201
3).
An assessme
nt of the education and training of victim advocates to work with
abused children
in North Carolina: An investigation of the possible role for child life in cou
rtrooms
(Unpublish
ed master's thesis). East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
395. Tucker, J., &
McCann, L. (2013). Collaborating for family
-centered care: Int
egrating child life
specialis
ts in the prenatal setting.
Journal of Obs
tetric, Gynecologic, &
Neonatal Nurs
ing, 42
(1), S49.
396. Manheime
r, L. (2000). Child life in a non
-hospital sett
ing: A play group for substance abusers and
their drug-exposed infa
nts and toddlers. In E. K. Oremland & J. D. Oremland (Eds.),
Protecting
the
emotional dev
elopment
of the ill c
hild: the essence of the child life profession
(pp. 173-189). Madis
on, CT:
Psychosoc
ial Press.
64 | ACLP
397. Bodner, K., D’Amico, S., Luo, M., Sommers, E., Goldstein, L., Neri, C., & Gardiner, P. (2018). A
cross-sectional review of the prevalence of integrative medicine in pediatric pain clinics across the United
States. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 38, 79-84.
398. Decosimo, C. A., Hanson, J., Quinn, M., Badu, P., & Smith, E. G. (2019). Playing to live: Outcome
evaluation of a community-based psychosocial expressive arts program for children during the Liberian
Ebola epidemic. Global Mental Health, 6, 1-12.
399. Brock, K., Snaman, J., Kaye, E., Bower, K., Weaver, M.,
Baker, J., . . . Ullrich, C. (2019). Models of
P
ed
i
atr
ic Palliative Oncology Outpatient Care - Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities. Journal of
Oncology Practice, 15(9), 476-487.
400. Kim, D. H.
& Yoo, I. Y. (2010). F
ac
tors
as
sociated with resilience of school age children with cancer.
Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 46, 431-436.
401. Greup, S. R., Kaal, S. E. J., Jansen, R., Manten-Horst, E., Thong, M. S. Y., van der Graaf, W. T. A., .
. . Husson, O. (2018). Post-traumatic growth and resilience in adolescent and young adult cancer
patients: An overview. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, 7(1), 1-14.
402. Shapiro, E. R. (2002). Chronic illness as a family process: A social-developmental approach to
promoting resilience. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, 58(22), 1375-
1384.
403. Carter, B., Edwards, M., & Hunt, A. (2015). 'Being a presence': The ways in which family support
workers encompass, embrace, befriend, accompany and endure with families of life-limited children.
Journal of Child Health Care, 19(3), 304-319.
404. Im, Y. J. & Kim, D. H. (2011). Factors associated with the resilience of school-aged children with
atopic dermatitis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 80-88.
405. Rosenberg, A. R., Starks, H., & Jones, B. (2014). "I know it when I see it." The complexities of
measuring resilience among parents of children with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22, 2661-2668.
406. Boles, J. (2013). When everything changes: Supporting resilience in children with acquired brain
injuries. Pediatric Nursing, 39(6), 314-289.
407. Kazak, A. E. (2006). Pediatric psychosocial preventative health model (PPPHM): Research, practice
and collaboration in pediatric family systems medicine. Families, Systems, and Health, 24(4), 381-395.
408. McManus, R. P. (2002). Adolescent care: Reducing risk and promoting resilience. Clinical Practice,
29, 557-569.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 65
Contributors
____________________________________________________________________________
Jessika Boles, PhD, CCLS is a Certified Child Lif
e Specialist and team lead at Monroe
Carell Jr. Children's Hosp
ital at Vanderbilt, and an Adjunct Professor in the Department
of Psychology and Hum
an
Development at Vanderbilt
University.  In her current
positions and her pr
ior tenure at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Dr. Boles has
served infants, children, ad
olescents, and young adults with chronic, life
-threatening, or
terminal illnesses and injuries.  The diversity of
her educational background
- a
bachelor of arts in Religio
us Studies from Rhodes College, a master's of education in
Applied Child Studies
from Vanderbilt University, and a doctorate in Educational
Psychology from the Univ
ersity
of Memphis - shapes her clinical work
and research, both of which aim to
break down the discursive ba
rriers that can limit children's understanding of and participation in their
healthcare experiences.  Her pub
lications and presentations similarly address
topics such as children’s
involvement in healthcare research, thei
r conceptions of abstract constructs such as legacy and loss, and
the ways in which they acc
ess and respond to medical information.  Additionally, Dr. Boles is a former
board member of the Association of Child Li
fe Professionals and
regularly contributes her time t
o
institutional initia
tives for improving bereavement care, increasing patient mobility, and mitigating trauma
and distress in pediatr
ic critical care environments. 
66 | ACLP
Camille Fraser, MS, CCLS, CIMI is a Child Life Specialist II at Monroe Carell Jr.
Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Family
Science at Lipscomb University. In her clinical role, she works in the pediatric
cardiology department providing services to the outpatient cardiology clinic, pediatric
cardiac intensive care unit, and cardiac step-down unit. Camille has helped lead both
unit-specific and institution-wide initiatives to improve bereavement support, facilitate
the formation of infant attachment, and enhance sensory support measures to aid in
long-term coping and regulation. She has held previous child life positions working in
acute care and PRN roles. Her educational background includes a Bachelor of Arts degree in family
relations from Lipscomb University and a Master of Science degree in child life from Bank Street College
of Education.
Katherine Bennett, MEd, CCLS, has worked as a Certified Child Life Specialist at
Monroe Carell, Jr. Children's Hospital since 2001. She has worked with children and
families in the areas of operative surgery, community outreach/education, PICC,
inpatient medicine with all age groups, and in the burn center. Currently, she serves as
the educator for Child Life & Volunteer Services, planning and coordinating the clinical
training experiences for emerging child life professionals, onboarding new employees,
working with the department's clinical advancement program and providing education
about the needs of children in healthcare settings to colleagues both in and outside the Vanderbilt
community. She has written and presented at international conferences and in several published outlets
about such topics as medical play and its impacts, developmental theory applied to hospitalized children,
and teaching child life in the clinical and university settings.
Maile Jones, MEd(c), CIMI is a graduate student pursuing her Master of Education
degree in Applied Child Studies at Vanderbilt University, where her coursework and
clinical experiences have focused on pediatric healthcare. After obtaining her Bachelor
of Science degree in Psychology and Health and Wellness from Tulane University,
Maile spent a year in Australia working for the Starlight Children’s Foundation to
expand her knowledge in international child life practice. The diversity of her
experiences both locally and internationally have shaped her research interests in
understanding how children, adolescents, and caregivers cope with stress and
adversity in their lives. Maile currently works on several research projects including examining the effect
of group medical play interventions on children’s anxiety in the preoperative waiting area, and
investigati
ng the legacy perceptions described by pediatric patients, caregivers, and healthcare
professionals
. Her publications and presentations similarly include the importance of play in healthcare
settings, pediatric patient and caregiver perceptions of legacy, and the ways in which children’s anxiety
level and self-reported fear are influenced by medical play interventions.
The Value of Certified Child Life Specialists | 67
Jenna Dunbar, MEd(c), CIMI is a graduate student in the Applied Child Studies
program at Vanderbilt University’s Peabody College of Education and Human
Development pursuing an emphasis in pediatric healthcare, and a specialization in
poverty and intervention. She will graduate with her M.Ed. in May 2020 and is currently
completing her child life internship at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Using her
bachelor’s degree in journalism from the University of Missouri, professional experience
at both large and small magazines and in advertising, as well as her present and
evolving experience in pediatric psychosocial care, Jenna incorporates creativity and
effective communication into all aspects of her work. She often employs her nontraditional path to child
lif
e to formulate unique interventions and treatment strategies for pediatric patients and their
families, applying her well-rounded knowledge of the ways in which adversity, poverty, and
marginalization in childhood impact development. Jenna maintains involvement in research and has been
involved in quality improvement initiatives at Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt
that address the influences of child development and early adversity in pediatric healthcare, such as the
study of how legacy and loss are conceptualized by pediatric patients and their families, as well as
improving the treatment of newborns exposed to opioids in utero and procedures for diagnosing neonatal
abstinence syndrome (NAS).
Ashlie Woodburn, MEd, CCLS, CIMI is a Certified Child Life Specialist working at
Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt and serving the pediatric cardiology
population. Ashlie has experience implementing a wide range of child life interventions
that meet the needs of diverse patients and families across outpatient clinic, inpatient
acute and critical care settings. Ashlie is particularly interested in meeting the
devel
opmental needs of infants with chronic medical conditions. Ashlie has completed
certification as an infant massage instructor and has worked to implement programs to
increase the utilization of child life support during infant procedures and encourage developmentally
appropriate sensory support in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Her academic training includes
Bachelor of Science degrees in Psychology and Family and Human Development from Arizona State
University and a Master of Education degree in Child Studies from Vanderbilt University.
Mary Ann Gill, MEd(c), is a graduate student at Vanderbilt University, where she is
pursuing a Master of Education in Applied Child Studies with a concentration in
Pediatric Healthcare. While completing a Bachelor of Science in Psychology at St.
Mary's College of Maryland, Mary Ann spent several summers working at the Center
for Courageous Kids, a residential camp for children with serious illnesses. Her diverse
professional experiences there, in the special education field, and at Flying Horse
Farms, another medical specialty camp, have shaped her interests in teaching
emotional literacy, incorporating mindfulness into coping skills education, providing adaptive care for
children with developmental disabilities, and supporting adolescents and emerging adults through
healthcare transitions. Other publications, presentations, and research experiences include projects
related to sibling support, therapeutic camp programs, and behavioral interventions in pediatric
endocrinology. In the spring of 2020, she is completing a child life internship at Riley Hospital for Children
at Indiana Uni
versity Health. 
68 | ACLP
Anne Duplechain, MEd(c), is a graduate student at Vanderbilt University pursuing
her Mas
ter of Education degree in Applied Child Studies, with a concentration in
pediatric healthcare. After completing her Bachelor of Arts degree in elementary
education at Texas Christian University, Annie served children and their families
around the world through humanitarian work in Central America, Africa, and Asia. She
then returned to Texas to teach in a Title I school but felt a continued passion for
providing psychosocial support to children and families in healthcare settings. In her
graduate studies, with aspirations to become a child life specialist in a critical care environment, Annie
has concentrated her coursework, research, and service on best practices for bereavement programs
and the ways in which child life and spiritual care can partner to provide holistic, patient-and-family-
centered care. She has published and presented on this work at national and regional conferences for a
wide range of stakeholder audiences to provide multidisciplinary clinicians with evidence-based
approaches for ameliorating negative psychological sequelae associated with hospitalization and loss.
After completing her internship, Annie will pursue certification and continue to establish her identity as a
child life specialist. 
Erin Munn, MS, CCLS is a Child Life Specialist III at Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s
Hospital at Vanderbilt in Nashville, Tennessee, with twenty-five years of experience as
a Certified Child Life Specialist.  Over her fifteen years at Johns Hopkins Children’s
Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland and nine years at Vanderbilt, Erin has served
children and families across a wide range of inpatient and outpatient areas -
cardiology, critical care, pre-surgery, burn/trauma, and specialty clinics – as well as
her current role with a quality improvement initiative focused on opioid-exposed
newborns and thei
r mothers. Throughout her career, she has maintained a
commitment to the professional development of child life students and staff, serving as co-chair of the
Internship Task Force for the Association of Child Life Professionals (ACLP) and developing standardized
curriculum modules and a supervisor manual for child life internship programs. In addition to numerous
presentations at conferences in the United States, Erin has been an invited speaker for conferences and
education series in New Zealand, the Philippines, and in the Balkans.  Erin has been an active member of
ACLP since 1995 and is a former President of the organization; most recently, she was named as the
recipient of the Mary Barkey Clinical Excellence Award to acknowledge her exemplary child life care and
high level of clinical skill. 
Katy Hoskins, CCLS is a Certified Child Life Specialist in the Neonatal Intensive Care
Unit at Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt in Nashville, TN. Katy's
interests and advocacy centers around infant mental health, non-pharmacological pain
management/procedural support for infants, prenatal psychosocial support for parents
and siblings in Maternal Fetal medicine, preterm developmental needs, and family-
centered end of life care. Katy has been a child life specialist for four years with
previous clinical experience in the emergency department and inpatient neurology.
Katy was instructed and mentored by Dr. Cara Sisk, Ph.D. at Tennessee Tech
University and graduated in 2015 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Human Ecology with a
concentration in Child Life. Katy serves on many hospital committees, including chair of the NICU
Bereavement Committee, and is also an ACLP Bulletin committee member.
www.childlife.org
ACLP Vision
ACLP advances psychosocial care and the emotional safety of children, youth, and families
impacted by healthcare and significant life experiences.
ACLP fosters child life professionals through:
Standards and credentialing
Connection, collaboration and community
Evidence-based practice
Professional development
Championing the child life profession
ACLP Mission