INWORK Issue Brief No.9
Women in Non-standard Employment
*
*
This document was prepared by Mariya Aleksynska, with guidance
and comments by Philippe Marcadent, Shauna Olney and Janine Berg.
1
Unless stated otherwise, this policy brief draws on ILO, 2016a.
2
ILO, 2016b.
Non-standard employment (NSE), including temporary employment, part-me and on-call work, mulparty
employment arrangements, dependent and disguised self-employment, has become a contemporary feature of
labour markets across the world. Its overall importance has increased over the past few decades, and its use has
become more widespread across all economic sectors and occupaons.
However, NSE is not spread evenly across the labour market. Along with young people and migrants, women are
oen over-represented in non-standard arrangements. This policy brief examines the incidence of part-me and
temporary work among women, discusses the reasons for their over-representaon in these arrangements, and
suggests policy soluons for alleviang gender inequalies with respect to NSE
1
.
Women in part-me work
Part-me employment (dened stascally as
employees who work fewer than 35 hours per
week) is the most widespread type of non-standard
employment found among women. In 2014, over 60
per cent of women worked part-me hours in the
Netherlands and India; over 50 per cent in Zimbabwe
and Mozambique; and over 40 per cent in a handful
of countries including Argenna, Australia, Austria,
Belgium, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Mali,
Malta, New Zealand, Niger, Switzerland, and United
Kingdom (gure 1). Where casual work is widespread,
such as in India and Australia, part-me work is
common. In nearly all countries of the world, women
are also more likely to be found in part-me work than
men. While women make up less than 40 per cent of
total employment, their share of all those working
part-me is 57 per cent.
2
Gender dierences with
respect to part-me hours are over 30 percentage
points in the Netherlands and Argenna. There is
at least a 25 percentage point dierence in Austria,
Belgium, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Niger, Pakistan,
and Switzerland.
Moreover, marginal part-me work involving
less than 15 hours per week features parcularly
sizeable gender dierences (gure 2), including
in Brazil, Germany, India, Mozambique, the
Netherlands, Niger, and Switzerland, even though in
Brazil and Mozambique marginal part-me work is
also prominent among men.
2
Note: Upper panel: percent of part-mers among male wage employees; lower panel: percent of part-mers among female wage employees.
Data correspond to the year 2014 or nearest available year, in the range 2011-2014.
Source: ILO (2016a) on the basis of ILOSTAT.
Figure 1. Distribuon of part-me work (fewer than 35 hours per week) among male and female wage
employees, 2014
3
Schmid and Wagner, 2016; calculaons based on ELFS.
4
Euwals and Hogerbrugge, 2006; Fallick, 1999; Thévenon, 2013.
5
Eurofound, 2012.
By far the main reason for women being over-
represented in part-me work is their tradional
role as caregivers. In Europe in 2014, 27 per cent of
all female part-mers reported choosing this type
of work because of the need to look aer children
or incapacitated adults, against only 4.2 per cent
of male part-mers.
3
This reason also echoes the
unequal distribuon of unpaid work that women
undertake in the home and the consequences of this
inequality on the likelihood of obtaining standard
jobs in general given the hours and availability
that some standard employment requires as well
as the reservaon that some employers have in
hiring women because of other demands on them
outside work.
Another set of reasons reect dierent cultural
and instuonal sengs, as well as occupaonal
segregaon. While manufacturing is generally
characterized by full-me hours, the services sector,
where most women work, relies heavily on part-
me work.
4
As the demand for workers in services
connues to grow, it is ancipated that more women
than men will connue to be found in part-me jobs.
In Europe, in services such as health and social work,
educaon, and in hotels and restaurants over 20 per
cent of workers are employed part-me,
5
and these
sectors are likely to connue to expand. Low-skill jobs
in retail sales and cleaning employ very high numbers
of female part-mers, with the incidence surpassing
over 70 per cent among women in Germany and a
handful of other EU countries (gure 3).
Male
Female
3
6
Eurofound, 2015.
7
Brinkley, 2013.
8
ILO, 2016b.
Figure 2. Distribuon of very short hours work (fewer than 15 hours per week) among male and female wage
employees, 2014
Note: Upper panel: percent of part-mers among male wage employees; lower panel: percent of part-mers among female wage employees.
Data correspond to the year 2014 or nearest available year, in the range 2011-2014.
Source: ILO (2016a) on the basis of ILOSTAT.
The higher presence of women in marginal part-
me jobs can also be explained by their presence
in occupaons that commonly recruit on an on-
call basis. In Italy, 60 per cent of all employees in
the hotel and restaurant sector and 13 per cent
of all employees in educaon, health, social and
personal services are employed on an on-call
basis.
6
In the United Kingdom, many zero-hours
contracts are found in educaon, health and
public administraon (30 per cent of all zero-hours
contracts) and hospitality and retail services (27 per
cent of all zero-hours contracts).
7
This form of work
presents a challenge as it contributes to the trend
in lower earnings for women. Without minimum
hours, workers in on-call employment are at risk of
economic instability and considerable work–family
conict, as they may not be able to ancipate the
earnings they will receive.
8
Male
Female
4
Figure 3. Gender gap in part-me work, in the elementary sales and cleaning services sector, selected
European countries, 2009–10.
Note: Percentage of employees working part-me.
Source: EU SILC, 2009–10 pooled. Tabulated data from Leschke, 2015.
Part-me work is somemes seen as an important
means for enabling women to integrate into
the labour force.
9
However, whether it can help
promote gender equality, or rather reinforce
stereotypes, will depend on the quality of the
part-me work and how it is viewed by society.
For example, many higher-paid, higher-skilled
jobs leading to careers are simply unavailable on
a part-me basis, and there may be signicant
obstacles for moving from part-me to full-me
jobs, in part as a result of skill requirements,
but also because of percepons about women’s
commitment to full-me work as well as the
dicules women can face in working extended
hours at a paid job.
10
In some instances, women
wishing to switch from full-me to part-me may
have to change to a lower-skilled occupaon,
11
thus also partly explaining the high incidence of
female part-me employment in the lowest paid
jobs (gure 3).
When working part-me is voluntary, it can be
advantageous and allow for a beer work-family
balance. Yet, throughout the world, more women
than men report that they are underemployed
meaning that they are willing but unable to work
more hours (gure 4). The involuntary part-me
employment oen results in lower wages, lower
training opportunies, and poorer career prospects
for women. Moreover, insucient hours of work may
also result in inadequate social security contribuons,
or even exclude women from social security coverage
if they work less than a specied threshold number
of hours. As a result, women may be more vulnerable
than men in face of unemployment, health problems,
and nancing rerement. In addion, in countries
such as Australia, Canada, Germany, Ghana, and
United States, women are more oen than men
obliged to hold mulple jobs in order to provide a
steady stream of work and income - once again
conrming that part me is oen an involuntary
choice” (ILO, 2016a).
9
Fagan et al., 2012.
10
Sirianni and Negrey, 2000.
11
ILO, 2016b.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Male Female
5
Figure 4. Incidence of me-related underemployment, as a percentage of all persons in employment, 2010
Note: Data coverage: 87 countries. Denions of regions correspond to the ILO Regions; data for Arab States are unavailable.
Source: ILO (2016a) on the basis of ILOSTAT.
Women in temporary employment
Women are also oen over-represented in temporary, rather than in permanent jobs, though the situaon
varies substanally across countries. For example, in Europe, between 1995 and 2014, the incidence of xed-
term contracts (FTCs) among women remained on average two percentage points higher than that of men
(gure 5). In Japan, women are over four mes more likely than men to hold temporary jobs.
12
In the Republic
of Korea, women account for 52 per cent of temporary employment (and 59 per cent of non-renewable
temporary contract employment) despite making up 43 per cent of overall wage employment.
13
In Brazil and
South Africa, temporary employment rates are also higher for women than for men; the situaon is however
reversed in Argenna and Indonesia.
12
OECD, 2014.
13
Jung, 2010.
Figure 5. Employees with xed-term contracts as a percentage of the working populaon aged 15 to 64,
total and by sex, selected European countries, 1995–2014
Note: Quarterly data for 1995 excludes Estonia, Hungary, Poland, Germany and the United Kingdom.
Source: ILO (2016a), on the basis of European Union Labour Force Survey 1995–2014 (Eurostat). Countries included: Belgium, Germany, Estonia,
Spain, France, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, the United Kingdom; yearly data used except for 1995
(only quarterly data available) and weighted for annual esmates.
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
Total temporary Male Female
6
14
Rubery and Grimshaw, 2009; Grimshaw, 2011.
15
Azmat et al., 2004.
16
The Guardian, 2014, describes the results of a survey of 500 Brish managers and shows that 40 per cent of them
generally avoided hiring young women to avoid maternity costs.
17
Lee and Eun, 2014; OECD, 2015; Dixon, 2011.
One of the reasons for the higher incidence
of women in temporary work is to be found in
the reforms to liberalize the use of xed-term
contracts that some countries undertook with
the stated goal of smulang or accommodang
women’s increased parcipaon in the labour
market (for example, in Italy). Another reason is
that in many countries, the tradional posion of
women in sociees and their unequal care-giving
responsibilies may undermine their bargaining
power, making them more likely to accept jobs
with less stability.
14
The percepon that women
are parally dependent on family income
and thus less dependent on waged work may
result in lower remuneraon oered to women
(ILO, 2016b). In contrast to this percepon, the
recent ILO-Gallup study shows that most women
consider their income from work to be at least a
signicant contribuon to the household income
(ILO and Gallup, 2017). In addion, women tend to
receive less support in the form of unemployment
benets as a result of gaps in contribuon periods,
thus perpetuang their need to accept jobs of
inferior quality as compared to men.
15
Regarding
young women, there is some anecdotal evidence
that managers may be reluctant to hire them
on permanent contracts in order to avoid costs
associated with maternity leave.
16
Like part-me work, temporary employment may
have its advantages and disadvantages, and a key
queson is to what extent it is voluntary or not.
In Europe, sixty-three per cent of women state
that they engage in temporary jobs because they
could not nd a permanent one. This incidence
is slightly higher than for men; moreover,
empirical evidence shows that for women,
there is a higher probability that temporary
jobs will not lead to permanent employment,
but rather conne women to temporary jobs or
result in unemployment or inacvity. Temporary
jobs are also oen characterized by lower pay,
as compared to permanent jobs in the same
sectors and occupaons. For example, women in
temporary jobs face wage penales, as compared
to women with similar personal characteriscs
and in similar though permanent jobs, reaching
15 per cent in the Republic of Korea, 13 per cent
throughout EU-15 countries, and 7 per cent in
New Zealand.
17
Temporary jobs also oen result
in poorer social security outcomes; longer hours
of work including unpaid over-me; poorer health
outcomes, including in terms of stress and exposure
to harassment; poorer training opons; higher risks
of exclusion from collecve bargaining and freedom
of associaon (whether in law or in pracce) and
higher risks of workplace discriminaon. All of these
issues contribute to low-pay and poor skill upgrading
of women, exacerbang gender inequalies in the
labour market. Moreover, they also pose societal
challenges, as couples in unstable jobs oen delay
marriage and child-bearing unl they nd stable
employment, thus contribung to demographic
decline.
Addressing work decits for women in NSE
As with other working arrangements that may pose
challenges and result in unequal outcomes, the point
is not to forbid non-standard jobs, but rather to render
them decent. Also, many women aspire to working
part-me, and some prefer having a temporary job
at some point in their life. Thus, the key quesons
are how to create good-quality non-standard jobs
that will be voluntarily taken up by both women and
men, how to improve the quality of those NSE jobs
that exhibit decits in working condions, and how
to improve transions towards beer-quality jobs,
including standard jobs. While some of the policies
aimed at achieving these goals are clearly specic
to the nature of the NSE jobs, it is also important to
have policies that concern the general improvement
of social outcomes for women and for their families.
With respect to part-me and temporary work, it is
essenal to ensure equal treatment for women and
men alike, and also in comparison with standard
workers. This is important not only to avoid
discriminaon based on occupaonal status but also
as a way of ensuring that NSE are not used solely to
lower labour costs by oering worse condions. Given
the over-representaon of women in NSE, ensuring
equal treatment for non-standard workers helps
to combat gender discriminaon at the workplace.
Establishing minimum guaranteed hours and liming
the variability of working schedules is an important
safeguard for part-me, on-call and casual workers.
Policies to support transfer from full-me to part-
me work and vice versa should be instuted more
widely. Establishing limits on temporary work, such
as allowing their use only for genuinely temporary
but not for permanent tasks, can help prevenng
abusive hiring on temporary contracts.
7
18
Fultz, E. 2011.
19
Blau and Kahn, 2013; Leschke, 2015.
20
ILO, 2014.
Countries should also strengthen, and somemes
adapt, their social protecon systems to ensure that
all workers benet from social protecon coverage.
Of parcular relevance for women, this may include
eliminang or lowering thresholds on minimum
hours, earnings or duraon of employment so that
workers in NSE are not excluded; or making systems
more exible with regards to contribuons required
to qualify for benets, allowing for interrupons
in contribuons, and enhancing the portability of
benets between dierent social security systems
and employment statuses. Such policies can be
complemented by measures to recognize care work
(e.g. child rearing) as contribuon periods counng
towards social security entlements, which can
facilitate the access of women to social security
benets and reduce gender inequalies in social
insurance systems, as is the case in Chile, Germany,
Japan, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
18
These
changes should be complemented by eorts to
guarantee a universal social protecon oor. Many
of the NSE jobs that women perform, especially
the involuntary ones, are informal and oer low
pay. Many also are disproporonally found in
occupaons and sectors that are somemes not
covered by minimum wage policies and collecve
agreements, such as the domesc work sector. It
is thus important to make minimum wage policies
and collecve bargaining more inclusive of women
in general, but especially in sectors that pose
parcular risks in terms of quality work. Promong
formalizaon of such sectors should also be a
priority.
Broader public policies aimed at women in
non-standard work can either reinforce gender
stereotyping and its subsequent ramicaons in
the labour market or remedy it. Indeed, dierences
in labour force parcipaon rates frequently reect
prevailing social welfare policies, tax policies and
the provision of public services. In this regard, it is
important to instute policies aimed at increasing
overall labour force parcipaon of women by
promong tax systems that favour second earners,
and making it easier for women and men to reach
beer work-family balance through publicly funded
and adequate care services, public transfers, and
suitable and quality workplace working me.
19
Maternity protecon remains one of the most
important policy measures allowing women to
remain aached to the labour market in general,
and it is essenal to ensure the adequate eecve
coverage of all women, regardless of employment
status.
20
References
Azmat, G.; Guell, M.; Manning, A. 2004. Gender gaps in unemployment
rates in OECD countries, Working Paper of the Centre for Economic
Performance No. 607 (London, London School of Economics).
Blau, F.D.; Kahn, L.M. 2013. Female labor supply: Why is the US falling
behind? IZA Discussion Paper No. 7140 (Bonn, Instute for the
Study of Labor).
Brinkley, I. 2013. Flexibility or insecurity? Exploring the rise in zero hours
contracts. The Work Foundaon Report: Lancaster University.
Dixon, S. 2011. “Temporary employment and the quality of temporary
jobs”, in New Zealand Journal of Employment Relaons, Vol. 36,
No. 1, pp. 1–20.
Eurofound. 2012. Fih European Working Condions Survey. Publicaons
Oce of the European Union (Luxembourg).
—. 2015. New Forms of Employment (Dublin).
Euwals, R.; Hogerbrugge, M., 2006. “Explaining the Growth of Part-me
Employment: Factors of Supply and Demand” in LABOUR, Vol. 20,
No. 3, pp.533-557.
Fagan, C., et al, 2012. The inuence of working me arrangements on
work-life integraon or ‘balance’: A review of the internaonal
evidence”. Condions of Work and Employment Working Paper No.
32. (Geneva, ILO).
Fallick, B., 1999. “Part-me Work and Industry Growth” in Monthly Labor
Review, Vol. 22, pp. 22-29.
Fultz, E. 2011. Pension creding for caregivers: Policies in Finland, France,
Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Canada and Japan.
(Washington D.C.).
Grimshaw, D., 2011. What Do We Know about Low-Wage Work and Low-
Wage Workers? Analysing the Denions, Paerns, Causes and
Consequences in Internaonal Perspecve, Condions of Work and
Employment Working Paper No. 28. (Geneva, ILO).
ILO. 2014. Maternity and Paternity at Work. Law and pracce across the
world. ILO: Geneva.
—. 2016a. Non-standard employment around the world: Understanding
challenges, shaping prospects. ILO: Geneva.
—. 2016b. Women at Work: Trends 2016. ILO: Geneva.
ILO and Gallup, 2017. Towards a beer future for women and work: Voices
of women and men. ILO: Geneva.
Jung, S-M. 2010. “Women part-me workers in Korea: Status and
Characteriscs,in Monthly Labour Review, Korea Labor Instute,
December. Translated version available at: hps://www.kli.re.kr/
kli_eng/selectBbsNView.do?key=220&bbsNo=31&nNo=100766
[May 2016].
Lee, B.-H.; Eun, S. M. 2014. “Labor Polics of Employment Protecon
Legislaon for Nonregular Workers in South Korea”, in Korea
Journal, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 57-90.
Leschke, J. 2015. “Non-Standard Employment of Women in Service Sector
Occupaons: A Comparison of European Countries” in W. Eichhorst
and P. Marx (eds): Non-Standard Employment in post-Industrial
Labour Markets (Elgar Publishing Limited: Cheltenham).
OECD. 2014. OECD Employment Outlook (Paris, OECD).
—. 2015. “Non-standard Work, Job Polarisaon and Inequality, in:
OECD: In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benets All (Paris,
OECD Publishing). Available at: hp://www.keepeek.com/Digital-
Asset-Management/oecd/employment/in-it-together-why-less-
inequality-benefits-all/non-standard-work-job-polarisation-and-
inequality_9789264235120-7-en#page25 [May 2016].
Further informaon:
Inclusive Labour Markets, Labour Relaons and
Working Condions Branch (INWORK)
Internaonal Labour Oce
4, route des Morillons
CH-1211 Geneva 22,
Switzerland
Tel: +41 22 799 6754
Fax: +41 22 799 8451
www.ilo.org/inwork
ISSN 2411-684X (print)
ISSN 2227-9334 (web)
May 2017
Rubery, J., and D. Grimshaw, 2009. Gender and the minimum wage.
Paper presented at the ILO Regulang for Decent Work
Conference (Geneva, ILO).
Schmid, G.; J. Wagner. 2016. Managing Social Risks of Non-standard
Forms of Employment: Europe Compared to Selected
Countries in Asia, Lan America, and Africa, unpublished ILO
working paper. ILO: Geneva.
Sirianni, C.; Negrey, C. 2000. “Working me as gendered me” in
Feminist Economics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 59-76.
The Guardian, 2014. 40% of Managers Avoid Hiring Younger Women
to Get around Maternity Leave. August 12. Available at:
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2014/aug/12/
managers-avoid-hiring-younger-women-maternity-leave
[June 2016].
Thévenon, O., 2013. Drivers of Female Labour Force Parcipaon in
the OECD. OECD Social, Employment and Migraon Working
Papers, No. 145 (Paris, OECD).