AGENDA
COMMITTEE ON CAMPUS PLANNING, BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS
Meeting: 11:10 a.m., Wednesday, November 8, 2023
Glenn S. Dumke Auditorium
Jack McGrory, Chair
Diana Aguilar-Cruz, Vice Chair
Larry L. Adamson
Raji Kaur Brar
Mark Ghilarducci
Leslie Gilbert-Lurie
Anna Ortiz-Morfit
Darlene Yee-Melichar
Consent
1. Approval of Minutes of the Meeting of September 12, 2023, Action
Discussion
2. California State University, Fresno Affordable Student Housing Schematic
Design Approval, Action
3. San Diego State University, Imperial Valley - Brawley Sciences Building
Project Schematic Design Approval, Action
Action Item
Agenda Item 1
November 7-8, 2023
Page 1 of 3
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE
COMMITTEE ON CAMPUS PLANNING, BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS
Trustees of the California State University
Office of the Chancellor
Glenn S. Dumke Auditorium
401 Golden Shore
Long Beach, California
September 12, 2023
Members Present
Jack McGrory, Chair
Diana Aguilar-Cruz, Vice Chair
Larry L. Adamson
Raji Kaur Brar
Mark Ghilarducci
Leslie Gilbert-Lurie
Wenda Fong, Chair of the Board
Jolene Koester, Interim Chancellor
Trustee Jack McGrory called the meeting to order.
Public Comment
Public comment occurred at the beginning of the meeting’s open session prior to all committees.
No public comments were made pertaining to committee agenda items.
Consent Agenda
The minutes of the July 2023 meeting of the Committee on Campus Planning, Buildings and
Grounds were approved as submitted.
Following approval of the minutes, it was explained that the topics would be reordered to
accommodate the schedule of a guest presenter for the California State University, Long Beach
Hillside North Student Housing Schematic Design Approval presentation.
CPB&G
Agenda Item 1
November 7-8, 2023
Page 2 of 3
California State University, Long Beach Hillside North Student Housing Schematic Design
Approval
This item requested approval of schematic plans for the California State University, Long Beach
Hillside North Student Housing project.
During the presentation, Paul Gannoe, previously Chief of Planning and Design in Capital
Planning Design and Construction, was introduced and congratulated on his promotion to Assistant
Vice Chancellor, Capital Planning Design and Construction, upon the retirement of Vi San Juan.
Following the presentation, a question was asked about the value engineering approach which was
undertaken for this project. It was explained that the builder, the architect, and the university
collaborated on the process, and a second opinion was obtained from another builder. It was noted
that site work is a high percentage of the cost, and it was explained that the water table on campus
is high and special foundational elements are required. A question was asked about contingency
costs, and it was explained that the estimate includes a 10% construction contingency and
additional contingency for design. It was recommended that for future projects, a target cost per
square foot should be established and architects should design to that target number. Additionally,
it was suggested that the trustees be provided with an independent value engineering report so that
project costs can be reviewed.
A question was asked about how this project will be funded, and it was explained that the funding
plan for this project has changed over time. Due to financial challenges this year, the State took
back approximately $1B for projects, but in exchange gave the CSU enough permanent base
budget money to pay for debt service. The CSU views this as a preferred funding arrangement
because the additional money is a permanent addition to the base budget. It was confirmed that
the money allocated to this project does not compete with other projects for state money.
The project team was congratulated on value engineering efforts and reasonable project cost, but
it was noted that the contingency element is high and should be managed closely.
The committee recommended approval of the proposed resolution (RCPBG 09-23-07).
Update and Approval of the Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan
This item requested approval by the California State University Board of Trustees of the Five-
Year Capital Outlay Plan covering the period from 2024-2025 through 2028-2029.
Following the presentation, it was suggested that in addition to the six funding strategies that were
outlined in the presentation, philanthropy should be added as a seventh strategy. It was noted that
philanthropy has been becoming more important in recent years along with various combinations
of funding approaches. The importance of funding capital projects was emphasized, to support
the CSU’s ability to increase enrollment in key programs and meet labor force needs. The need
for a bond initiative was also noted.
CPB&G
Agenda Item 1
November 7-8, 2023
Page 3 of 3
It was asked why the proposed budget request for capital is only $1.3B when critical needs are
actually $2.4B, and it was explained that the Chancellor’s Office is trying to make an aggressive
but realistic request. Concern was expressed that the lower request sends the wrong message and
will not adequately address the growing capital needs of the CSU. It was explained that in addition
to the budget request, the CSU’s complete list of capital needs are continuously communicated
with the Department of Finance and other governmental bodies.
The committee recommended approval of the proposed resolution (RCPBG 09-23-06).
California State University, San Bernardino Palm Desert Off-Campus Center Student
Services Building Schematic Design Approval
This item requested approval of schematic plans for the Student Services Building project at the
California State University, San Bernardino Palm Desert Off-Campus Center (Palm Desert
Campus).
Following the presentation, it was noted that the estimated cost is $200 per square foot above the
cost of comparable buildings, and it was asked what donors are willing to pledge for extra
amenities. It was also reiterated that a value engineering report would be helpful to the trustees in
analyzing project costs. It was explained that the proposed clock tower will not be built unless the
university receives funding from the donor. It was also noted that the desert climate presents
challenges, including a significant loss of productivity due to the heat in the summer months. It
was reiterated that setting cost goals per square foot would be helpful. It was explained that for
sites such as this which are not adjacent to utilities, costs will be higher than in urban settings.
It was noted that this building will present an opportunity, as there are not many buildings in the
region to host high visibility events, and it also could create synergy with the community college.
A question was asked about the difference between assignable square feet and gross square feet.
It was explained that assignable square feet include offices and other primary purposes, whereas
gross square feet include areas such as bathrooms, corridors, and stairwells.
It was noted that this project means a lot to the students and the community, but cost is still a
concern, including the large percentage allocated for site work. The CSU’s pool of money is
limited, therefore project costs need to be closely scrutinized.
The committee recommended approval of the proposed resolution (RCPBG 09-23-08).
Trustee McGrory adjourned the Committee on Campus Planning, Buildings and Grounds.
Action Item
Agenda Item 2
November 7-8, 2023
Page 1 of 5
COMMITTEE ON CAMPUS PLANNING, BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS
California State University, Fresno Affordable Student Housing Schematic Design Approval
Presentation By
Steve Relyea
Executive Vice Chancellor and
Chief Financial Officer
Deborah Adishian-Astone
Vice President for Administration and CFO
California State University, Fresno
Paul Gannoe
Assistant Vice Chancellor
Capital Planning, Design and Construction
Summary
This agenda item requests approval of schematic plans for the California State University, Fresno
Affordable Student Housing project.
Affordable Student Housing
Project Architect: SVA Architects
Construction Manager at Risk Contractor: TBD
Background and Scope
California State University, Fresno (Fresno State) proposes to design and construct a four-story,
57,948 assignable square feet (ASF)/82,838 gross square feet (GSF) Affordable Student Housing
building (#89
1
) on the existing Parking Lot 27, located at the southwest corner of the campus and
west of Homan Hall (#88), an existing residence hall. This project was approved for funding in
2022-2023 through the State’s Higher Education Student Housing Grant Program (HESHGP) to
provide affordable student housing. As part of the 2023-24 state budget, the Higher Education
Student Housing Grant will be replaced with CSU Systemwide Revenue Bonds supported by
ongoing state appropriation. The Board of Trustees approved this funding swap in the July 2023
meeting. Fresno State will seek future Board of Trustees approval of Systemwide Revenue Bond
financing for the self-support portion of the project funding. The grant program allows affordable
beds to be located across the university inventory of new beds and the existing student housing
inventory.
1
The facility number is shown on the master plan map and recorded in the Space and Facilities Database.
CPB&G
Agenda Item 2
November 7-8, 2023
Page 2 of 5
Fresno State is a vibrant, diverse university community with approximately 24,000 students
located in the central valley. The university is a federally designated Hispanic-Serving Institution,
Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-Serving Institution and is the driver of
social mobility in the San Joaquin valley. The majority of students at Fresno State are low-income
students. Fifty-two percent of Fresno State students are Pell-eligible; and 74% of undergraduate
students are first-generation college students. Fresno State has not built new student housing since
the late 1960s. The existing housing capacity of 1,121 beds can accommodate less than 5% of the
student population with more than 250 students on the housing waitlist.
The university’s vision is to provide access to affordable housing for all students that will improve
graduation rates and support student success. This proposed project is aligned with the university’s
Strategic Plan vision of diversity, equity, and inclusive excellence, and will provide much needed
affordable housing to designated low-income students, reducing the total cost of attendance,
bolstering direct access to affordable student housing for those students in the most need, and
improving student retention and graduation rates.
This project will construct 228 apartment style beds allowing the housing program to
accommodate most of the students on the current waitlist. The first floor will provide a learning
community, recreational spaces, and accessible housing units. The three upper residence floors are
identical and include student housing units, shared study and gathering spaces, laundry facilities,
and space for a resident advisor. Shared common spaces on each floor will foster student
engagement and a sense of community. Outdoor hardscape and landscape areas will provide
additional space for studying and recreation.
The new student housing building is a four-story load-bearing metal framed system supplemented
by a concrete floor on a metal deck over structural metal steel joists. The overall massing creates
a stepped roofline with the main entrance at the ground level. The proposed project is currently
designed to meet the CSUs Sustainability Policy requirements. Notable sustainability features
include low flow plumbing fixtures, high quality air filtration, maximum insulation values for
walls and roofs, double-glazed windows, drought-tolerant landscaping, efficient irrigation
systems, and groundwater recharge design elements.
Timing (Estimated)
Completion of Preliminary Drawings January 2024
Completion of Working Drawings May 2024
Start of Construction October 2024
Occupancy August 2026
CPB&G
Agenda Item 2
November 7-8, 2023
Page 3 of 5
Basic Statistics
Gross Building Area 82,838 square feet
Assignable Building Area (CSU
2
) 57,948 square feet
Net Useable Building Area (FICM
3
) 76,000 square feet
Efficiency (CSU) 70 percent
Efficiency (FICM) 92 percent
Cost Estimate—California Construction Cost Index 8287
4
Building Cost ($500 per GSF) $41,442,000
Systems Breakdown ($ per GSF)
a. Substructure (Foundation) $ 11.09
b. Shell (Structure and Enclosure) $ 134.30
c. Interiors (Partitions and Finishes) $ 115.73
d. Services (HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, Fire) $ 159.67
e. Built-in Equipment and Furnishings $ 9.44
f. Special Construction and Demolition $ 0
g. General Requirements/Conditions and Insurance $ 70.05
Site Development $4,397,000
Construction Cost $45,839,000
Fees, Contingency, Services $11,054,000
Total Project Cost ($687 per GSF) $56,893,000
Fixtures, Furniture & Movable Equipment $1,857,000
Grand Total $58,750,000
Cost Comparison
The student housing building’s cost of $500 per GSF is lower than the $760 per GSF for the West
Campus Green Student Housing and Health Center at San Francisco State University approved in
January 2023, the $689 per GSF for the Affordable Student Housing Buildings #22 and #23 at
2
Assignable building area is based on CSU policy.
3
Net useable building area is greater than assignable building area by including corridors, restrooms, mechanical rooms,
etc., based on the definitions of the Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory & Classification Manual (FICM).
4
The July 2022 Engineering News-Record California Construction Cost Index (CCCI). The CCCI is the average
Building Cost Index for Los Angeles and San Francisco.
CPB&G
Agenda Item 2
November 7-8, 2023
Page 4 of 5
CSU Northridge approved in July 2022, the $551 per GSF for the Student Housing project at Cal
Poly Humboldt approved in January 2023, the $580 per GSF for the University Village Housing
and Dining project at CSU San Marcos approved in May 2023, and the $685 per GSF for the
Hillside North Student Housing project at CSU Long Beach approved in September 2023, all
adjusted to CCCI 8287.
During the value engineering process, Fresno State saved approximately $7 million in direct
construction costs through several mindful revisions, including simplifying exterior design,
reducing landscaping and site features, and choosing the most cost-effective mechanical systems,
framing system, and finish materials. Sustainability elements included in the project that exceed
code requirements, such as solar panels and highly efficient water conservation measures support
the overall sustainability goals of California and the CSU and generate operating savings over the
life of the facility.
Funding Data
This project was approved for funding ($31,050,000) in 2022-2023 from the State’s Higher
Education Student Housing Grant Program (HESHGP). As part of the 2023-24 state budget, the
Higher Education Student Housing Grant will be replaced with CSU Systemwide Revenue Bonds
supported by ongoing state appropriation. The Board of Trustees approved this funding
realignment in the July 2023 meeting. This project will receive additional state-support CSU
Systemwide Revenue Bonds ($2,700,000) from the 2023-24 state approved $7,489,000 to fund
cost overruns associated with approved CSU affordable student housing project grants. In addition,
this project will be co-funded with CSU Systemwide Revenue Bonds ($25,000,000) for self-
support programs. The board will be asked at a future meeting to consider the approval of the CSU
Systemwide Revenue Bond financing for the self-support portion of the project funding.
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Action
The proposed project is exempt under Categorical Exemption Class 32 of the Guidelines for
Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Guidelines § 15132). This
exemption applies to infill development projects that are consistent with applicable land use plans;
on sites of no more than five acres, with no habitat value for sensitive species, that are substantially
surrounded by urban uses and can be adequately served by public utilities and services; and that
would not result in significant traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality impacts.
The project is subject to and incorporates applicable mitigation measures provided in the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program adopted in conjunction with certification of the
1994 Campus Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No.
94032022). The applicable mitigation measures would be implemented during construction.
Supporting documentation for the categorical exemption is available for review at:
https://adminfinance.fresnostate.edu/facilitiesmanagement/projects/completedprojects.html
CPB&G
Agenda Item 2
November 7-8, 2023
Page 5 of 5
Recommendation
The following resolution is recommended for approval:
RESOLVED, By the Board of Trustees of the California State University, that:
1. The California State University, Fresno Affordable Student Housing project will
benefit the California State University.
2. The California State University, Fresno Affordable Student Housing project
qualifies for a categorical exemption from CEQA and a Notice of Exemption
shall be filed following project approval (Guidelines § 15062(a)).
3. Applicable mitigation measures adopted in conjunction with Campus Master
Plan approval and EIR certification in 1994 shall be implemented, monitored,
and reported in accordance with the requirements of CEQA (Cal. Pub. Res. Code
§ 21081.6).
4. The schematic plans for the California State University, Fresno Affordable
Student Housing project are approved at a project cost of $58,750,000 at CCCI
8287.
Action Item
Agenda Item 3
November 7-8, 2023
Page 1 of 6
COMMITTEE ON CAMPUS PLANNING, BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS
San Diego State University, Imperial Valley - Brawley Sciences Building Project Schematic
Design Approval
Presentation By
Steve Relyea
Executive Vice Chancellor and
Chief Financial Officer
Adela de la Torre
President
San Diego State University
Paul Gannoe
Assistant Vice Chancellor
Capital Planning, Design and Construction
Summary
This agenda item requests the California State University Board of Trustees approve schematic
plans for the San Diego State University, Imperial Valley, Brawley Sciences Building project.
Project Background and Scope
Architect: AC Martin
Collaborative Design-Build Contractor: Sundt
The Brawley Sciences Building (#102
1
) is a new 22,500 assignable square feet (ASF)/36,900 gross
square feet (GSF) teaching laboratory and research building on the SDSU Imperial Valley,
Brawley campus. Imperial County’s economic forecast projects a dramatic workforce and skill
deficit that is facing the region and will continue to grow over the next ten years. This project will
expand degree program offerings for students in the Imperial Valley region in the sciences and
engineering fields and foster the local workforce to enhance their skills in the support of renewable
and alternative energy production.
The project will serve 60 FTES in a combination of lower and upper division wet and dry teaching
labs (6,300 ASF). The program also includes 7,500 ASF of flexible use wet and dry research labs,
teaching and research lab support spaces, including graduate student workstations, 18
faculty/researcher offices, conference rooms, and informal collaboration spaces throughout the
building. The building will include core facilities with major instruments and experimental
fabrication space for collaborative work with industry partners.
1
The facility number is shown on the master plan map and recorded in the Space and Facilities Database.
CPB&G
Agenda Item 3
November 7-8, 2023
Page 2 of 6
The project’s exterior building massing will be constructed with a two-story tilt-up concrete
structure composed of three volumes that are informed by solar exposure and prevailing wind
directions. The shape of the building creates a three-sided courtyard leading to the main entrance,
with a shaded colonnade providing a pathway from the existing Initial Building (#101). The
concrete exterior walls are ideal to withstand the extreme climatic conditions of the Imperial
Valley, and window openings are strategically placed in these walls to optimize indoor daylighting
and transparency while keeping solar heat gain to a minimum. The building’s taller volume to the
north accommodates teaching and research labs, the shorter volume to the south houses faculty
and advising offices, and a central double-height lobby space at the main entry connects the two
wings.
The building will connect to existing domestic water, sanitary sewer, and telecommunications
utility lines at the Brawley center. The building will utilize onsite bioretention basins for all storm
drainage and runoff. A new electrical utility feed from the local utility company will service the
building. Power will be provided from existing overhead lines along Highway 78 and then will
run underground to a new transformer located in the new utility yard northeast of the building.
The electrical system includes lighting, power, emergency power, fire alarm, and infrastructure
for solar photovoltaics to be generated from future solar panels on the canopy. The building will
take advantage of electrified air source heat pumps to provide energy efficient water heating. All
space and water heating will be electrified, eliminating the need for natural gas.
The Brawley Sciences Building will achieve the sustainability goals of the university by pursuing
active energy production strategies, as well as using architecture in a strategic way to mitigate
solar heat gain and reduce operating energy loads. The project includes EV charging stations,
infrastructure for future solar photovoltaics, runoff management, native landscaping, and efficient
insulation and fixtures. This project will meet the requirements of the CSU Sustainability Policy.
Timing
Preliminary Plans Completed December 2023
Working Drawings Completed January 2024
Construction Start January 2024
Occupancy August 2025
Basic Statistics
Gross Building Area 36,900 square feet
Assignable Building Area (CSU
2
) 22,500 square feet
2
Assignable building area is based on CSU policy.
CPB&G
Agenda Item 3
November 7-8, 2023
Page 3 of 6
Net Useable Building Area (FICM
3
) 35,100 square feet
Efficiency (CSU) 61 percent
Efficiency (FICM) 95 percent
Cost Estimate – California Construction Cost Index (CCCI) 8287
4
Building Cost ($1,412 per GSF) $52,089,000
Systems Breakdown ($ per GSF)
a. Substructure (Foundation) $ 38.56
b. Shell (Structure and Enclosure) $ 261.60
c. Interiors (Partitions and Finishes) $ 141.95
d. Services (HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, Fire) $ 508.73
e. Built-in Equipment and Furnishings $ 123.01
f. Special Construction & Demolition $ 0.00
g. General Requirements $ 39.13
h. General Conditions and Insurance $ 298.64
Site Development $6,572,000
Construction Cost $58,661,000
Fees, Contingency, Services $19,339,000
Total Project Cost ($2,168 per GSF) $78,000,000
Fixtures, Furniture & Movable Equipment $2,000,000
Grand Total $80,000,000
Cost Comparison
The building cost of $1,412 per GSF is higher than the CSU cost guide figure of $742 per GSF for
a biological sciences (wet lab) building, the $947 per GSF for the Science Replacement Building
at San Francisco State University approved in November 2020, and the $1,149 per GSF for the
Interdisciplinary Science Building at San Jose State University approved in September 2018, all
adjusted to CCCI 8287. Factors that contribute to the high building cost include: the remote
location of the Brawley campus; the advanced technology lab environment, including heavy lab
equipment required for industry collaboration; the extreme climatic conditions of the Imperial
3
Net useable building area is greater than assignable building area by including corridors, restrooms, mechanical
rooms, etc., based on the definitions of the Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory & Classification Manual
(FICM).
4
The July 2022 Engineering News-Record California Construction Cost Index (CCCI). The CCCI is the average
Building Cost Index for Los Angeles and San Francisco.
CPB&G
Agenda Item 3
November 7-8, 2023
Page 4 of 6
Valley requiring additional mechanical cooling to counteract the high loads of energy consumption
in this lab intensive building; and the building's sustainable features such as heat recovery chillers
for hot and cold water distribution and the use of electric energy only, as natural gas will only exist
for lab use.
Funding Data
The project will be funded with $80,000,000 in state appropriations approved in the final 2022-
2023 California State Budget.
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Action
An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) tiering from analysis in the 2003
SDSU Imperial Valley Master Plan Project EIR was prepared to analyze the potential significant
environmental effects of the proposed project in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and
the CEQA Guidelines.
The IS/MND concluded that the project would result in potentially significant impacts on
Biological Resources, Archaeological Resources, Paleontological Resources, and Tribal Cultural
Resources. The IS/MND further determined the proposed project would result in less than
significant impacts in the remaining environmental impact categories: Aesthetics, Agriculture and
Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Cultural Resources (Historic Resources), Energy, Greenhouse
Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and
Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation,
Transportation, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire.
The IS/MND was made available to the public for review and comment from September 5, 2023,
to October 5, 2023. Four written comment letters were received by the close of the review period,
from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 11, the Imperial County Air
Pollution Control District (ICAPCD), the Imperial Irrigation District (IID), and the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Caltrans asked for clarification of the status of traffic
improvements along SR-78 required by mitigation measures adopted in conjunction with the 2003
EIR, and the status of dedication by SDSU to Imperial County of right-of-way along the SR-78
for a right-turn lane into the Brawley Center driveway. The IAPCD questioned the project’s
compliance with its rules and regulations and the thresholds of significance used to determine air
quality impacts. The IID noted the need for new electrical and, potentially, water, sewer, and
stormwater infrastructure to serve the project and requested coordination with SDSU regarding
any necessary rights-of-way and easements. CDFW questioned whether a comprehensive
biological resources assessment had been performed addressing sensitive species potentially
affected by the project, and suggested clarifications and minor revisions to IS/MND mitigation
measures. Public comments have been reviewed and considered and did not raise substantive new
issues not already addressed in the IS/MND or resulted in the need for substantive revisions.
Responses to all comments are provided in the finalized IS/MND.
CPB&G
Agenda Item 3
November 7-8, 2023
Page 5 of 6
Mitigation measures incorporated into the IS/MND as conditions of project approval, together with
mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program adopted in conjunction
with the 2003 EIR, reduce all potentially significant project impacts to a less than significant level.
Each of the mitigation measures is listed in, and will be implemented through, the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6
and CEQA Guidelines Section 15097, for adoption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15074(d).
Accordingly, there is no substantial evidence, considering the whole record, that the Brawley
Sciences Building project may have a significant effect on the environment. This finding is
supported by the IS/MND and all related materials, in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section
15070. The IS/MND and related materials are available for review by the Board and the public at:
https://bfa.sdsu.edu/campus/facilities/planning/eir.
Recommendation
The following resolution is presented for approval:
RESOLVED, by the Board of Trustees of the California State University, that:
1. The IS/MND was prepared to evaluate the environmental effects of the Brawley
Sciences Building project and confirms that the project will not result in new
significant impacts that cannot be mitigated, pursuant to the requirements of
CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA
Guidelines. The IS/MND is consistent with the assumptions in and is properly
tiered from, the 2003 SDSU Imperial Valley Master Plan Project EIR and has
been completed in compliance with CEQA (Public Resources Code 20180(d)
and (e)) and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.
2. This resolution is adopted pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources
Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, which require that
the Board of Trustees make findings regarding significant project effects prior
to the approval of a project.
3. The Board of Trustees finds that the IS/MND reflects its independent judgment
and analysis and hereby adopts the IS/MND, approves the project, and reaffirms
prior adoption of the Findings of Fact and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program prepared for the 2003 SDSU Imperial Valley Master Plan Project EIR.
CPB&G
Agenda Item 3
November 7-8, 2023
Page 6 of 6
4. Mitigation measures contained within the 2003 SDSU Imperial Valley Master
Plan Project EIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program that are
applicable to the Brawley Sciences Building project are hereby incorporated by
reference and shall be monitored and reported in accordance with the
requirements of CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).
5. The Brawley Sciences Building project will benefit the California State
University.
6. The schematic plans for the Brawley Sciences Building project are approved at
a project cost of $80,000,000 at CCCI 8287.