What is Blue Hydrogen?
The idea of “clean” hydrogen has become popular in recent years among policymakers and the
fossil fuel industry as a potentially cleaner source of energy that can be made from fossil fuels,
but not emit greenhouse gases when combusted. However, hydrogen can be produced in
multiple ways with different power sources, each of which results in different climate impacts.
The “cleanest” form is “green” hydrogen, which uses renewable energy to split water molecules
into hydrogen energy. Green hydrogen is currently only 1% of the global hydrogen supply. Gray
hydrogen, which accounts for 95% of the global hydrogen supply, is created by using
methane-generated steam to break apart methane.
“Blue” hydrogen, one of the proposed products of KeyState to Zero, is made from methane gas,
only with the added step of CCS. Safely, securely, and permanently storing carbon underground
has yet to be proven at commercial scale and certainly not at any sites in Pennsylvania, making
this “blue” hydrogen project purely theoretical. The vast majority of CCS projects worldwide to
date have either failed or dramatically underperformed projected capture rates. There is no
current manufacturing facility similar to KeyState to Zero that permanently holds its captured
CO2 onsite.
Oil and gas companies are promoting blue hydrogen as a “bridge fuel,” using the same
language and strategy used for decades in promoting methane gas. Blue hydrogen is the latest
false solution these industries are promoting to protect their market share and delay the
necessary transition to clean, renewable energy.
Environmental Concerns
The production of blue hydrogen is capable of resulting in large amounts of greenhouse gas
emissions, primarily from upstream fugitive methane emissions. Hydrogen, while itself not a
GHG, is capable of interacting with GHGs in the atmosphere to compound their warming effects;
it is an “indirect” GHG. Hydrogen is also the lightest element in the universe and extremely
leaky. Hydrogen atoms are so small they can diffuse into metals, embrittling them, creating leak
and explosion risks. Research indicates that fugitive hydrogen emissions can be 11 times more
potent than CO2 at heating the atmosphere over a 100-year period.
The storage of CO2 through CCS also poses risks to the environment and public health.
Capturing and storing the CO2 itself is expensive and energy-intensive. CO2 is odorless and
colorless. Because CO2 is heavier than oxygen, if it leaks from pipelines or underground
storage, it could replace the oxygen in a given space and could lead to asphyxiation. High
concentrations of leaks from this infrastructure can also prevent combustion vehicles from
operating. CO2 quickly causes confusion, respiratory trouble, and can lead to death within
minutes of exposure. Stored CO2 can also acidify and leak, contaminating drinking water
supplies.