PSSA Grade 7 English Language Arts Item and Scoring Sampler—August 2023
41
PSSA ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS GRADE 7
In conclusion, the author uses Mary’s thoughts,
writing, and homesickness to help show her creativity.
The author also used makeing a new friend to help
show her creativity. The author alsouses alot of
diolog to help support her creativity.
This response inconsistently addresses some parts of the task, demonstrating partial analytic understanding of the
text. In the weak introduction, the student restates part of the task (the main character Mary Louise is creative) and
presents a controlling idea (The author reveals her creativity through the way she thinks, her witing, and her way of
thinking of her old home.) that goes beyond a literal interpretation of the text by presenting three inferential ways the
author reveals Mary’s creativity. However, the development in the body of the response is weak rather than clear. The
first body paragraph focuses on the first inference from the controlling idea (The author usesher thinking to show her
creativity.). The student presents a quote (The author says, “ ‘And I could sit here by the window in the sun—and dry
it.’”) and attempts to clarify it with a weak inference that weakly connects to the controlling idea (This shows here
creativity because she thinks of using the sun to dry her hair.). Then, the student presents a second quote (The author
also says, “‘If only,’ thought Mary Louise, bitterly, ‘there is such a thing as a back yard in this city – a back yard where
I could squat on the grass, in the sunshine and the breeze – Maybe there is.’”), which is followed by another weak
inference that attempts to connect it to the controlling idea (This shows that the author uses Mary’s thoughts to show
her creativity. These examples show that the author can use Mary’s thoughts to show her creativity.). This repetitive
development falls short of clear analysis; the student simply claims that the quotes cited show that the author uses
Mary’s thoughts to reveal her creativity without actually analyzing the connection. The same pattern continues in
the second body paragraph. The student presents the second inference from the controlling idea (Secondly; the
author uses Mary’s writing to show her creativity.) and follows it with a quote (The author says, “In vain Mary Louise
had striven to instill red blood in to his water veins.”). A weak inference (This show that the author uses Mary’s
writing to show her ceativity.) attempts to connect the quote with the controlling idea. Another quote is presented
(The author also says, “she made her heroine a creature of grace, wit, and loveliness, but fur the hero had not even
looked at her.”), followed by a similar weak inference (This shows that the author uses Mary’s writing to show her
creativity.). The paragraph’s concluding sentence reiterates the same weak inference for a third time (These show
that the author uses Mary’s writing to show her creativity.). Again, the development falls short of clear analysis. The
third body paragraph continues the trend, employing the third inference from the controlling idea (Thirdly, the author
uses Mary’s thoughts of her old home to show her creativity.). A quote is presented (The author says, “‘… this parsley
happens to be the only gardenly thing I have, so I thought I’d bring it along and sniff it once in awhile, and make it’s
the country…’”.), followed by a weak inference (This shows that the author uses Mary’s homesickness to show her
creativity.). Asecond quote is provided (The author also says, “”If you go up high enough,’ observed Mary Louise,
‘the sunshine is almost the same as it is in the country, isn’t it?’”), followed by a similar weak inference (This shows
the author uses Mary’s homesickness to show her creativity.). Again, a reiteration of the weak inference is used in
an attempt to summarize the paragraph (These quotes show that the author can use Mary’s homesickness to show
her creativity.). The weak conclusion, again, reiterates the three points made in the controlling idea (In conclusion,
the author uses Mary’s thoughts, writing, and homesickness to help show her creativity.). The essay concludes with
two new, and unsupported, ideas (The author also used making a new friend to help show her creativity. and The
author also uses a lot of diolog to help support her creativity.), neither of which qualify as clear analysis. Transitions
are standard (Secondly; Thirdly; In conclusion), and precise language is inconsistently used to convey experiences
and events. Errors present in spelling (witing; ceativity; makeing; alot; diolog), usage (here for her), and punctuation
(quotation marks misplaced), and missing words in selected quotes (but [so] fur the hero; make [believe] it’s the
country) sometimes interfere with meaning.