Volume 170, number 2
FEBS LETTERS
May 1984
Ca2+
in a very briefly rehydrated fiber in the
absence of exogenous calmodulin. This means that
in freeze-dried fibers rehydrated for only 1.5 min
in relaxing solution, the endogenous ‘free’
calmodulin available for eliciting contraction had a
concentration of about 0.3-l FM. If appropriate
corrections are made for diffusional losses during
the brief rehydration (table 1) an upper value of
about 3-4pM may be estimated for intracellular
concentration of the free calmodulin responsible
for contraction in living smooth muscle. At this
calmodulin level a Ca2+ concentration of 1.5 PM
would evoke a nearly maximal (i.e., 80%)
contraction.
4. CONCLUSIONS
The results shown in fig.1 and table 2 strongly
indicate that both the free intracellular CaM and
that part of the intracellular CaM directly involved
in contraction control are identical and are about
4 PM. This CaM is very similar to that of MLCK
if the value given in [l] is corrected for the in-
tracellular water space [9,10]. This suggests that
functionally both proteins are present in approx-
imately equimolar concentrations. In the presence
of calcium some part of the free CaM may be
bound to ‘caldesmon’ [ 111. This protein has been
identified in gizzard muscle and it has been sug-
gested that complexation of caldesmon by Ca2+
and CaM is necessary for the initiation of contrac-
tion. It is not known if intestinal smooth muscle
contains caldesmon and what function, if any, is
regulated by this protein.
Nine tenths of the total amount of smooth mus-
cle CaM is not directly involved in the control of
tension development. The function of this large
amount of CaM is unknown. It certainly
represents a compartment which binds Ca2+
without eliciting contraction. From table 2 it can
be calculated that at least 50 pmol Ca2+/kg wet wt
need to be released during contraction to saturate
the 4 Ca2+ binding sites of CaM and thereby to ac-
tivate the MLCK completely. This value is within
the range of that amount of Ca2+ which is released
from intracellular stores during contraction of
smooth muscle [12]. It is, therefore, conceivable
that the large excess of CaM represents a sink of
Ca2+ which prevents tension development by small
amounts of released Ca2+. This consideration
together with the relatively low concentration of
free CaM available for the initiation of contraction
suggests a high calcium requirement for smooth
muscle contraction.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank MS C. Zeugner for expert technical
assistance, MS I. Berger for typing the manuscript
and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for sup-
porting this work.
REFERENCES
111
PI
131
[41
151
161
[71
PI
[91
WI
1111
WI
Adelstein, R.S. and Klee, C.B. (1981) J. Biol.
Chem. 256, 7501-7509.
Blumenthal, D.K. and Stull, J.T. (1980)
Biochemistry 19, X08-5614.
Sparrow, M.P., Mrwa, U., Hofmann, F. and
Rtiegg, J.C. (1981) FEBS Lett. 125, 141-145.
Conti, M.A. and Adelstein, R.S. (1981) J. Biol.
Chem. 256, 3178-3181.
Grand, R.J.A., Perry, S.V. and Weeks, R.A.
(1979) Biochem. J. 183, 285-295.
Neering, I.R. and Morgan, K.G. (1980) Nature
288, 585-587.
Stienen, G.J.M., Gtith, K. and Rtiegg, J.C. (1983)
Pfliigers Arch. 397, 272-276.
Kakiuchi, S., Yasuda, S., Yamazaki, R., Teshima,
Y., Kauda, K., Kakiuchi, R. and Sobue, K. (1982)
J. Biochem. 92, 1041-1048.
Casteels, R. (1969) J. Physiol. 204, 193-208.
Jones, A.W., Somlyo, A.P. and Somlyo, A.V.
(1973) J. Physiol. 232, 247-273.
Sobue, K., Miramoto, Y., Fugita, M. and
Kakiuchi, S. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78,
5652-5655.
Bond, M., Somlyo, A.V.,
Shuman, H. and
Somlyo, A.P. (1983) Proc. Int. Union Physiol. Sci.
XV, 261.
386