Summer 2023
CHEMICAL INSIGHTS
Current State of Chemicals and Materials M&A
Over the past quarter, news headlines have seemed skewed even more negative than usual: recessionary concerns, supply chain
disruptions, banking liquidity, inflation, rising interest rates, geopolitical uncertainty & conflicts, debt ceiling showdowns, and more.
Much has been written about these macroeconomic events, and we can concisely summarize them with a simple, obvious statement
there is significant uncertainty in the market. That being said, buyers and sellers are successfully navigating the current
environment, and transactions are getting done. In this Summer 2023 newsletter, we share real-time insights from industry leaders
on the pricing and volume dynamics rippling through the industry. Importantly, we highlight what these dynamics mean for M&A.
Also, to preview upcoming publications from the Grace Matthews team, be on the lookout for an ‘Industry Highlights’ series, where
we will dive into various sectors across the chemical and material science value chain. Up next: a focus on composites.
Chemicals & Materials Industry Update: Volume Declines, Price Increases & the Impact on M&A
Outside of pure strategic acquisitions where products, technologies, markets, facility overlap, or other true synergistic factors are
dominant, financial trends and outlook are the primary value and buyer interest determinants. In the current environment, volume
headwinds have been at the forefront of M&A discussions. Are these driven by customers destocking material after months of
inventory building? Is it demand softness in core end markets? Is it a combination of both? What do volume trends mean for
pricing? When will the headwinds end?
In order to gain a better understanding of these trends and their impact on M&A, we did some digging. At Grace Matthews, we
track performance of ~100 public chemicals and materials companies in the Grace Matthews Index (see page 4 for 10-year EV/
EBITDA chart). We recently sampled the Q1 2023 earnings transcripts for 20 industry leaders spanning multiple sectors from
commodity chemicals to specialty materials. It is no surprise that volume trends were a key focus across nearly all of the earnings
calls we reviewed. In 16 of those transcripts, industry executives referenced significant volume declines in many cases, executives
noted double-digit percentage declines relative to last year. You’ll see excerpts from these transcripts scattered throughout this
publication. Interestingly, nearly all pointed to robust pricing largely offsetting revenue lost from volume declines. Furthermore,
companies seem to have more success maintaining price increases than in prior years given increased “stickiness” of their customer
base, reshuffling of global supply chains and higher service levels. We recognize that trends and drivers likely vary significantly
across the chemicals value chain. What we found interesting though were the similarities in both the challenges faced and the
strategies utilized to counter recent volume declines, regardless of end market or vertical. In other words, this is a universal theme in
that it spans the entire chemical value chain.
Grace Matthews Chemical Insights
1
Summer 2023
In light of these trends, the key question we are asked by clients is, “How does this impact the M&A process?” Let’s first revisit events
of the past two years:
Supply gets tight (2021-2022): Starting with COVID-19 and the subsequent Texas freeze, supply chain challenges became the norm.
This was compounded by a labor shortage, reshaping of the European energy market, and more cautious views on China, all of
which led to further squeezing of supply chains. It was commonplace for materials to be in limited supply (allocations were
common), and pricing in many cases spiked to all-time highs. Despite the increased cost, the reaction by many was to increase
inventory on hand to secure supply and attempt to pass through any price increases to customers. It was a bit of the wild west in
terms of stockpiling materials, and we often heard clients note “if we could get more inventory…we could sell it.As companies
were faced with these challenges, elevated purchasing became typical, as executives valued stable supply to customers over
working capital efficiencies. It is no surprise that this strategy was frequently referenced in transcripts by multinational public
companies:
Patrick Joseph Winterlich (Executive VP, CFO & Acting Corporate Controller of Hexcel): We deliberately allowed our
inventory to grow, recognizing some of the supply chain challenges and bringing in the materials. And we did that in order
to make sure that we didn't delay or impact our customers…
Supply chain easing (H2 2022 Current): In late 2022, as customers started transitioning away from excess stocking strategies,
suppliers began to anticipate declines in their sales volumes. Significant destocking occurred as companies found themselves
holding elevated levels of (and in many cases, high-priced) inventory. While it isn’t possible to quantify the exact impact and timing
of destocking throughout the value chain, the dynamic was very real (and in some cases, is still ongoing). This exacerbated inventory
management issues for many companies, as they had to deal with customers reducing or delaying orders to resolve their own
overstocking issues.
Macroeconomic events certainly didn’t help the outlook, raising concerns of subdued demand moving forward. While demand and
outlook vary by sector, demand softness remains a large concern among industry executives.
Matthias Zachert (CEO & Chairman of the Board of Management of Lanxess): “We get feedback from customers that they
are still living from inventories that they built up in course of 2021, 2022 when supply chains were disrupted...
Robert Patterson (CEO, Chairman & President of Avient): “From a destocking standpoint, it seems like many customers really
still feel like they've got a lot of inventory on hand. I know some of that's anecdotal. I can't tell you what percentage of
customers that is, but we certainly hear that routinely.
Luis Rojo (Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Stepan): What you saw in Q1 was, we are still depleting high-cost
raw materials that we have in the system…And we believe we're going to need at least Q2 to finish the depletion of some of
these materials…
Andrew Tometich (CEO, President & Director of Quaker):Volumes continue to be impacted by a continuation of softer end
market conditions, primarily in the steel and industrial markets…We continue to see softer end market activity across all
regions and at varying degrees.
Christian Kullmann (CEO & Chairman of the Executive Board of Evonik): “We do have a broad-based weak demand, which
is combined with continued destocking across most of our businesses...
Ilham Kadri (CEO, Chairman of the Executive Committee & Non-Independent Director of Solvay): In February, We shared
some insights on our early view of the first quarter, including our expectation that volumes would decline in a weak macro
demand environment as destocking effect from quarter 4 would linger into the first half of the year. We also said that pricing
would offset the volume decline, and we were confident in our team's ability to sustain profitability and margins. And this is
exactly what happened.
It is impossible to separate the impact of destocking and soft demand on total volume declines, but one thing is clear both would
generally be a value detractor in a sale process. However, in most instances, pricing power has remained strong and bolstered
financial performance across the industry. Inflationary pressures and corresponding margin enhancing strategies have driven price
increases over the past year; these increases generally held and currently are helping to mitigate the impact of volume declines.
Additionally, increased raw material availability is leading to lower raw material prices (for some products) and providing additional
bottom-line cushion from volume declines.
The outlook for pricing and volume trends is uncertain, and several key questions remain for the future: when will customers work
through inventory stockpiles, how will end market demand trend, and when will prices return to “normal levels”, if ever. While most
Grace Matthews Chemical Insights
2
Summer 2023
executives indicate that volume declines are ongoing, it does seem that demand softness and destocking may be starting to abate
in some markets. A review of all 20 transcripts suggests that the exact timing for destocking normalizing and/or increased end
market activity varies by sector (no surprise). While some companies saw easing in late 2022/early 2023, others are just now seeing
easing.
Albert Yuan Chao (CEO, President & Director of Westlake): “Results reflect significant improvement in volumes, margins and
earnings from the fourth quarter of 2022 as customer destocking activity moderated, end market demand improved...
James Fitterling (CEO & Chairman of DOW): While we expect near-term conditions to remain challenging through the
year, we continue to see positive underlying demand trends driving above GDP growth across our attractive market verticals
over the next few years...
Timothy Knavish (CEO, President & Director of PPG): …as availability of raw materials returns to pre-pandemic levels, we
expect our earnings to start benefiting from moderate deflation from recent historic inflation highs. As a reminder,
aggregate raw material inflation since early 2021 remains at historically high levels… the high-level statement is, we expect
to continue to see moderation as we move through the year…but hard to quantify the scale of that at this point because
there's still so many moving parts...
Let’s now revisit the question: “How is this impacting a potential M&A process right now?” M&A deal volumes are down across the
global market; however, certain sectors and deal sizes have remained resilient. In particular, deals in the lower middle market (less
than roughly $30M in EBITDA) remain active as they are less dependent on financing sources that may be restricted in the current
capital market environment. Additionally, the chemical sector is viewed as resilient long-term its products and services are critical
to the global economy and investors generally recognize that long-term success outweighs short-term volatility.
On a more granular level, we wanted to share a few noteworthy M&A takeaways in the wake of recent trends.
1. Flight to Quality: The ability to achieve continued performance in today’s environment is a differentiator for businesses. As
a result, companies that can demonstrate strong performance, particularly as it relates to volume growth, are receiving
outsized market attention, as companies with a resilient business model are coveted in the current environment. Our recent
transactions have demonstrated this flight to quality.
2. Expect Increased Scrutiny During Diligence: More than in past years, we see buyers digging in on the quality of revenue,
volume and margin trends, with an emphasis on sustainability of current performance. Given heightened scrutiny on
granular performance drivers buyers are often looking in-depth at customer and SKU-level trends pre-process
preparation is as important as ever (see point #3).
3. Upfront Work to Quantify “Sustainable” Performance is Key: Trailing 12-month EBITDA is a key variable in M&A processes,
as it is widely viewed as one of the best metrics for gauging run-rate or sustainable performance. Given current market
variability, buyers are heavily scrutinizing near-term performance for acquisition targets. Doing the work to quantify go-
forward performance and craft a defensible story to support outlook ahead of a transaction process is critical. In periods of
strong economic activity, crafting a story is less important. However, given current economic uncertainty, the upfront work
we do to position our clients is critical, and we leverage the industry experience we’ve developed over the last 25 years to
most efficiently structure an opportunity for success.
4. Timing: In many instances, sellers may benefit from waiting to launch a sale process, allowing the company to demonstrate
continued performance (e.g., adding a quarter to demonstrate that price increases have taken hold and are sustainable, or
to demonstrate that a poor quarter of volume declines are a temporary blip due to destocking). We have shared this advice
with many clients over the past year, and suggest we use the extra time to work together to prepare for a sale process and
ensure the company is ready when we click “GO”. Pre-process preparation is critical (again, see point #3) and the timing for
a launch doesn’t inhibit important work ahead of time.
Because Grace Matthews is privately held, we are not dependent on transactions closing in a given quarter or year in order
to meet internal financial forecasts. As a matter of policy, we believe that whats best for our clients is best for our firm
sometimes, that means waiting to start a process until market conditions or business fundamentals are in the “right” place.
Performance trends are at the forefront of every conversation right now. How long the current dynamics will persist is hard to say,
but we know volume declines and price increases are having a material impact on the industry. These trends are driving an
emphasis on well-performing assets and leading to increased buyer scrutiny during financial diligence. If you are considering a
transaction, pre-process preparation is as important as ever. Doing the up-front work to “prove out a story of sustainable
performance and growth is critical.
Grace Matthews Chemical Insights
3
Summer 2023
Grace Matthews Chemical Index: Enterprise Value / EBITDA (Last 10 Years)
Source: Grace Matthews and Capital IQ
The Grace Matthews Chemical Index tracks the Enterprise Value / EBITDA ratios (“EV / EBITDA multiples" or "EBITDA multiples") of
95 publicly traded chemical companies that span multiple sub-sectors and geographies. The Index aggregates the latest reported
financial data and stock prices, and tracks valuation trends and operating metrics across different industry sectors. Index averages
are equally weighted, as opposed to weighting by market capitalization.
Select Industry Transactions
Transaction values in $US millions
Closed
Date
Acquirer / Target
Enterprise
Value (EV)
EV /
Sales
EV /
EBITDA
Pending
Apollo Global Management / Univar
Solutions
$8,165
0.7x
8.7x
Pending
Exponent Private Equity / IFF (Flavor
Specialty Ingredients Division)
$220
Pending
Gemini Coatings / Rudd Company
Pending
Azelis / Gillco Ingredients
Pending
Akzo Nobel / Sherwin-Williams (China Paints
Division)
Pending
International Chemical Investors Group
(ICIG) / Evonik (Cyanuric Chloride Division)
Pending
LyondellBasell / Quality Circular Polymers
(QCP)
Pending
Arkema / Polytec PT
Pending
Fujifilm / Entegris (Electronics Chemicals
Division)
Pending
LyondellBasell / Mepol Group
Pending
Solenis / Diversey
$4,516
1.6x
14.6x
Grace Matthews Chemical Insights
4
Current (as of May 2023): 10.1x
10 Year Average (as of May 2023): 11.0x
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
Summer 2023
Pending
IMCD / CPS Oil-Tech
Pending
Univar Solutions / Kale Kimya
$143
May-23
Cinven Group / MBCC Group (Admixtures
Division)
May-23
Aimia / Bozzetto Group
$244
1.0x
7.1x
May-23
H.B. Fuller / Beardow Adams
May-23
Foremark Performance Chemicals / NexGen
Chemical Technologies
May-23
Canlak Coatings / Ceram-Traz
Apr-23
Harbour Group / Americo Chemical
Products
Apr-23
AMSOIL / Benz Oil
Apr-23
IMCD / ACM
Apr-23
Audax Private Equity / Krayden
Mar-23
Hasa / Orenda Technologies
Mar-23
Vertellus / Centauri Technologies
Mar-23
Avery Dennison / Thermopatch
$44
1.1x
Mar-23
RelaDyne / Allied Oil & Supply
Mar-23
Stahl / ICP Group (Industrial Solutions
Division)
$205
1.5x
Mar-23
RelaDyne / Sun Coast Resources
Mar-23
Corteva / The Stoller Group
$1,200
12.0x
Feb-23
Archroma / Huntsman Corporation (Textile
Effects Division)
$718
0.9x
7.6x
Feb-23
Surteco / Synthomer (Laminates, Films and
Coated Fabrics Division)
$255
1.0x
8.0x
Feb-23
ESCO Technologies / CMT Materials
$18
1.2x
Jan-23
Grafe Polymer Solutions / Color Technik
Jan-23
Shrieve Chemical Company / Chem One
Jan-23
Wind Point Partners / Hasa
Transaction values in $US millions
Closed
Date
Acquirer / Target
Enterprise
Value (EV)
EV /
Sales
EV /
EBITDA
Grace Matthews Chemical Insights
5
Note: For transactions in which a less than 100% stake is acquired, enterprise value represents the implied EV as if a 100% stake were acquired. Enterprise values also
include contingent consideration.
Summer 2023
Grace Matthews: Select Chemical and Material Science Transactions!
Grace Matthews Chemical Insights
6
has sold its Menomonee Falls,
WI-based aerosol manufacturing
facility and related business to
has been recapitalized by
has been acquired by
has been acquired by
has been acquired by
has acquired the !
Industrial Solutions Group of
has been acquired by
has been acquired by H.I.G.
Capital's portfolio company
has sold its Colorado and !
New Mexico store locations to
has been acquired by
through its subsidiary, GEO
Specialty Chemicals, has sold
its DMPA business to
has acquired the kaolin !
minerals business of
through its subsidiary, Evans
Chemetics, has sold its
Thioester Business to!
has sold certain assets to!
!
!
has been recapitalized by
has been acquired by
a portfolio company of !
Audax Private Equity has been
acquired by"
Grace Matthews Client Listed First
has been acquired by Wind Point
Partners' portfolio company
has been acquired by Renovo
Capital and its portfolio company
has been acquired by
Summer 2023
Grace Matthews Overview
Grace Matthews is recognized globally as a leader in transaction advisory services for manufacturers and distributors throughout the
chemical and material science value chain. Grace Matthews’ clients include privately held businesses, private equity funds, and
large, multinational corporations.
Grace Matthews' practice is global in scope, and focuses on several areas: sell-side transactions and divestitures for private
companies, private equity holdings, and multinational corporations; buy-side work for large public companies, major multinationals,
and sponsor-backed platforms; leveraged transactions and recapitalizations, strategic advisory analysis, and transaction fairness
opinions. Areas of expertise include:
Adhesives, Sealants, Tapes
Catalysts, Petrochemicals
Colorants, Additives
Construction Chemicals, Building Products
Contract Manufacturing, Custom Synthesis
Distribution, Equipment, Infrastructure
Environmental Services
High Purity, Electronic Chemicals
Industrial Minerals, Inorganic Chemicals
Ingredients, Nutraceuticals, Flavors, Fragrances
Intermediates, Industrial Chemicals
Life Sciences
Lubricants, Greases, Metalworking Fluids
Oilfield & Water Treatment Chemicals
Paints, Coatings, Inks
Personal Care, Soaps, Medical Materials
Plastics, Composites, Molded Materials
Tolling, Private Label Products
Additional Chemical Sectors
Grace Matthews is a privately held investment bank with successful chemical and material science industry transactions dating back
to the early 1990s. Grace Matthews principals have completed over 200 transactions involving global corporations. Our team
approach is unique in investment banking, with a combination of extensive industrial, financial and M&A experience."
"
"
Contact Our Team
John Beagle Kevin Yttre Ben Scharff
Chairman, Co-Founder President, Managing Director Managing Director
jbeagle@gracematthews.com kyttre@gracematthews.com bscharff@gracematthews.com
Andy Hinz Doug Mitman Bridget Spaulding
Managing Director Co-Founder, Senior Advisor CFO
Jon Glapa Andrew Cardona Eric Sabelhaus
Director Director Director
Tom Osborne Michelle Tveten Chris Hayes
Senior Executive Marketing Director Associate
[email protected] [email protected] chayes@gracematthews.com
Matt Stouder Kyle Tamboli Jack Chandler
Associate Associate Senior Analyst
[email protected] [email protected] jchandler@gracematthews.com
Drew Gebhardt Jordan Boswell Gabby Caranto
Analyst Analyst Analyst
dgebhardt@gracematthews.com [email protected] gcaranto@gracematthews.com
Katie Long Headquarters
Office Manager 833 East Michigan Avenue
[email protected] Suite 1420
Milwaukee, WI 53202
414.278.1120
Grace Matthews Chemical Insights
7
Summer 2023
www.gracematthews.com
Grace Matthews, Inc. (www.gracematthews.com) is an investment banking group providing merger, acquisition, and corporate finance advisory services for chemical companies both in the U.S. and
internationally. Grace Matthews is global in scope and well known for its strong track record of success dating back to the early 1990s.
The information and views contained in this report were prepared by Grace Matthews, Inc. It is not a research report, as such term is defined by applicable law and regulations, and is provided for
information purposes only. No part of this material may be copied or duplicated in any form or by any means, or redistributed, without Grace Matthews’ prior written consent.
Copyright (c) 2023 Grace Matthews, Inc. All rights reserved. Securities are offered through GM Securities, LLC, which is indirectly owned by Grace Matthews, Inc., and a registered broker dealer and
member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Check the background of this firm on FINRA's BrokerCheck.
Grace Matthews Chemical Insights
8