To see this message in a more readable format with links to the images of my examples, please check out this Reddit post I made:
https://www.reddit.com/r/minnesota/comments/18837h2/a_serious_case_for_f29_as_our_new_state_flag/
-------------------
The Starflake Design: This motif is extremely simple, versatile, symmetrical, bold, and unique - all while containing a good amount of inclusive symbolism, for being such a simple geometric image.
The two elements are essentially: 1) a 4-pointed star, overlaid with 2) an 8-pointed star of diamonds.
The four pointed star has elongated points, and is meant to evoke (but not necessarily depict) a compass. The dependable directionality of a compass goes hand-in-hand with its linkage to the
Polaris, the North Star. There is a long history of depicting Polaris as 4-pointed to distinguish it from the many other more traditionally drawn 5-pointed stars in sky, within paintings, star-charts, etc.
This is a well-established Minnesota symbol.
The 8-pointed star is made of eight diamonds and is meant to evoke (but not necessarily depict) a snowflake. The 8-pointed star has deep roots in a variety of cultures and artistic traditions of
peoples residing in Minnesota today. It's been well noted that just such an 8-pointed star is hewn into the stone floor of the capitol rotunda already. In addition, the 32 points on the eight diamonds
(four each) symbolize our place as the 32nd state in the Union;and meaningful symbolism without added visual complexity is worth its weight in gold within a design such as this, where simplicity is
at a premium. This portion of the design is also a well-established (if unofficial) motif in our state - from countless quilts made by countless Minnesota grandmothers, to a million knitted winter hats
with 8-pointed stars and snowflakes, to the aforementioned rotunda floor.
Combined as it is here, we have two elements that should scream "Minnesota" to Minnesotans and non-Minnesotans alike: a snowy North Star against a cold, dark winter's night sky... if any other
state tried to claim that imagery, we'd be upset about it. Anybody who's lived in any part of Minnesota at any point in time, should relate to looking up into the cold night's sky and seeing a star or
two - even in brightly-lit Minneapolis or St. Paul. This scene, even in symbolic form, should evoke a feeling from Minnesotans - and a feeling that transcends anything that might otherwise divide us.
I oppose the suggestion of lightening the shade of blue, because it ruins this familiar "scene" for me - a star against a daytime sky? Nope. Plus the lighter colors of the design will naturally "pop"
more against a darker field.
I love that the design feels "quilty" - I really do. We're a folksy people - just because many of our forbears were pragmatic and sensible, it never stopped them from weaving beautiful designs into
their tools and products at work and home. Quilts have always been part of how we keep warm on these cold, clear nights, which the flag evokes. I love that we have an 8-pointed "snowflake" star
element - this is a symbol, not a science class - just do an image search for snowflake knitted or quilted pattern, and you'll get at least as many 8-pointed snowflakes as you do 6-pointed ones. But
you're free to think of it in any terms you like;if it helps to think of it as a star that merely resembles a snowflake, then go ahead. I got a chuckle when talking with family on Thanksgiving about the
snowflake, and an aunt of mine said "other places may have regular old 6-sided snowflakes, but Minnesota snowflakes aren't messing around;they go up to 8!"
Kidding aside, the symbol itself is ridiculously remixable, adaptable, and versatile. The primary reason is that the silhouette is so unique that the motif is still applicable in any color scheme and can
still read as "Minnesota".
If this design is selected you're going to potentially see any/all of our sports teams use it: Vikings, Twins, Wild (2), Timberwolves, MNUFC (2), etc. could display it on their uniforms or within their
branding and marketing however they see fit. This naturally applies to each of our universities as well: the UofM, St. Cloud State, Mankato, Bemidji, etc. And let's not kid ourselves, the symbol
would belong to everybody to use for whatever cause they like: here's a couple Pride flags, but this has unlimited applicability: political, cultural, civic, recreational, and other types of groups or
organizations can put their own spin on it.
The state itself can easily use such a simple, bold motif on whatever imagery it wants. There would never be a need to pay for everyone to get new MN State Highway signs, or license plates, or
state park entrance signs, but as the old ones inevitably need replacing, they can be done so with updated symbolism. This goes for long-standing important institutions like the State Fair as well.
I was feeling cheeky, so I totally broke the US Flag Code, and made a US Flag where the 32nd star is replaced with our Starflake - use this flag to remind folks that Minnesota is unique among equals.
Also just to prove a point, and not because I support vandalism, but if I can crudely deface a public surface in 10 seconds using my phone's image editor and still get a clear message across, I think
this is a symbol with potential - try that with any of the other flag's designs!
Speaking of phones, the proportions of the image, and it's minimal colors and geometric design make for a Minnesota official digital app icon - it passes the emoji test;if developed, could fit within a
line of text - all but the most minimalistic flag imagery fails in this regard. Minnesota cities and counties would have free reign to use the motif in their potential flag or branding updates, as they
wish.
The Starflake, on its own or as part of the flag, can be used to show state pride at home or abroad. Baseball caps, earrings, MPR tote bags, barn quilts. Use your MN umbrella on your vacation to
rainy Scotland and find your fellow Minnesotans;lay out on your Starflake beach towel in Fiji so that you and the only other Minnesotan there can exchange a silent, simple upper-midwestern head
nod of acknowledgement - totally worth it. Live on the border, and want to display some amity towards our friends up north? Fly this one!
The stars on the F1953 and F2100 are simply not unique enough to represent Minnesota. We'd merely be borrowing that star design, and owning nothing, missing an opportunity to establish a real
"brand". This robs us of a uniquely iconic design, and puts us in the same camp as countless Catholic or Lutheran church altars, or paintings of the Nativity who show this exact star design. Plus, it
would be nice to avoid any imagery that, even remotely, could be interpreted as religious or identifying one religion.
------------------
The Flag Itself: The central motif's symmetry and central placement mean the flag can be flown horizontally, vertically, in pennant form, and for those who really love and need the Minnesota
shape they can fly the flag in swallowtail form - knock yourselves out!: again, this flag will belong to us all, so do whatever you want with it!
A state flag also bears a ceremonial significance. Funerals of state and municipal law enforcement and emergency personnel, national guardsmen, etc. often include the flags of their respective
cities or states. This is no small thing to the families and loved ones of those who give their lives in service to their locality. States like Texas, Maryland, California, and cities such as Chicago and
Washington feature their flags heavily, and receiving a folded flag is the height of state or civic solemnity. A central image on a flag can be folded in such a way that the essence of the flag is
maintained post-folding and displayed as such. Good luck achieving that with our other flag designs, especially the Minnesota shape of F1953. Check out videos of the Marine Corps or Indian
national flags being folded to see how this can be done.
On a lighter, but still important, note: it's impossible to fly this flag upside down. Nobody likes a very public flag faux pas. Inevitably, there will be many cases of high-profile locations flying F1154
orF1953 upside down. Or is it F1154 and F1953? Be honest: did you have to look it up?
Also, really ask yourselves if any of those flags still achieve the desired imagery when hung vertically - flags are hung vertically in all kinds of places in more occasions than you might initially think -
which flag finalist loses absolutely nothing with a 90-degree turn?... only F29. It's the only flag you don't have to turn your mind (or indeed your entire head and neck) 90 degrees to get the desired
effect. And, maybe it's just me, but I don't want to see a tipped-on-its-side, sad Minnesota shape when I see F1953 hung vertically - in fact, now we have what looks like a mountain in that one -
that can't be right!
Now, it is true that the yellow/gold and the white colors could potentially meld into one another from a distance - it's a minor point against the flag: not a deal-breaker, but a minor problem. I'd like
to see a graphic designer take a shot at some defining/separating lines to distinguish the two colors - it's worth a shot. I'd also like to see the white brightened to it's absolute maximum, while the
yellow color deepened as much as possible to distinguish it from that white. It's something to play around with;but even if nothing changes, I'm more than fine with the design, because I believe it
jumps off the fabric, even at a distance. This minor issue pales in comparison to the muddying that occurs with all of the blueish and greenish hues touching each other in both F1154 and F1953 -
having two different blues on a flag is a problem, but then to have them adjacent(!) is really troublesome if we care how the flag reads at a distance, and in motion.
Another hang-up for some people is that this flag doesn't do much to separate us from the pack of US state flags. Seen all together, I'm not sure that any of the candidates really accomplish that
from a distance. But, while there's something to be said for uniqueness of a flag amongst its peers, there is also nothing wrong with being a variation on a theme. Flag culture is full of examples of
groups of flags that share colors (Slavic flags, Arab flags, some sets of South American flags) or that share design shape patterns (tricolors, Nordic crosses). There is symbolism in similarity, and I
don't think we should hide the fact that we share a meaningful foundation with our fellow states. I respect the impulse to stand out from the crowd, but I believe we've achieved that with the
Starflake design, if not the overall silhouette of our flag. And that's okay - as long as the symbolism within is meaningful and enduring.
To see this message with links to the images of examples, please check out this Reddit post I made:
https://www.reddit.com/r/minnesota/comments/18837h2/a_serious_case_for_f29_as_our_new_state_flag/